Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Intermediasi focused on the research (Empirical Study) or conceptual articles in economic science which consists of:

  • Finance and Banking
  • Islamic Finance and banking
  • Financial and Technology
  • Moneytary Policy
  • Digital Economic


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Enter the URL where this information can be found. To be able to see furthermore to know it can be read in the Journal of Economic Development. Any manuscript received by the review should be treated as a confidential document where it is not allowed to discuss other than the board editor. The results submitted by the reviewer must be clear and supported with good arguments


Publication Frequency

Journal Intermediasi is published regularly every two times a year (Maret and Oktober)


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license:

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)


Peer review process

Determination of articles to be published in an intermediation journal is carried out through a single blind peer review by considering the main aspects of relevance and contribution of articles to the development of banking and finance. The editor and reviewer provide constructive feedback on the evaluation results to the authors.



The papers published in the Intermediasi will be consider to retract in the publication if :

They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error) the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication) it constitutes plagiarism, it reports unethical research.

The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at : 



Screening for plagiarsm

Screening plagiarsm by Turnitin with similiarity maks 20 %