A case study in psychology education: How student have a problem solving skills?

Uus Toharudin, Iwan Setia Kurniawan


This study aims to determine the ability of problem solving student of biology and perceptions in the subject of educational psychology, using descriptive quantitative research method. The samples in this study were 30 students for the experimental group-1 and 30 students for the experimental group-2 group. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistical. The results showed that problem solving ability biology student teachers in educational psychology courses including both categories for the experimental group and category-1 enough for the experimental group-2. It is inversely related to the acquisition of the average score of the test result is the average score of the experimental group-1 amounted to 2.92, and the average score of the experimental group-2 at 3.11. The results of the questionnaire analysis of student perceptions obtained the highest score of 3.30, or by 82.5% said the ability of the faculty in presenting the material in an interesting way. While the lowest score of 2.50 or a 62.5% state that faculty lectures begin and end on time, and the availability of lecturers in providing guidance outside the lecture. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the experimental group problem solving ability-one better than the experimental group-2.


educational psychology, instructional model, problem solving

Full Text:



Ary, D. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Eight Edition. United State: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Asrori, M. (2009). Psikologi pembelajaran. Bandung: CV. Wacana Prima.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing Among five traditions. London: SAGE Publications

Fisher, A. (2001). Critical thinking. An Introduction. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Fitari, D. A., Susetyarini, E., & Sukarsono. (2015). Penerapan pembelajaran kooperatif dengan metode problem solving meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 1(1), 99-108.

Frederiksen, N. (1984). Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving; Review of Educational Research, 54 (3), 363 – 407.

Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: effects on third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology; 95 (2), 293 – 305

Girl, T. A., Wah, L. K. M., Kang, G. Ng., & Sai, C. L. (2002). New paradigm for science education: A Perspective of teaching problem-solving, creative teaching and primary science education; Singapore: Prentice Hall.

Gagne, R. M. & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instructinal design. Second edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Given, L. M. (2008). The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Singapore: Sage Publications.

Greeno, J. G. (1978). Natures of problem solving abilities. Dalam W.K. Estes (ed) Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Volume 5. Human Information Processing; New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.

Jumadi (2012). Pemetaan kompetensi pedagogik, profesional, kepribadian dan sosial guru fisika SMA/MA di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (Makalah). Yogyakarta: LPPKM UNY.

Marzano, R. J. (1988). Dimension of thinking: a framework for curriculum and instruction. Viginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Mbulu, J. (2001). Pengajaran individual pendekatan metode dan media pedoman mengajar bagi guru dan calon guru. Malang: Yayasan Elang Emas.

Nasution, S. (2008). Berbagai pendekatan dalam proses belajar & mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Palumbo. D. B. (1990). Programming language/problem-solving research: A review of relevant issue. Review of Educational Research; 60 (1), 65 –89.

Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W. & Johnson R.T. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive effort and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 60 (2), 129 –143.

Santrock, J. W. (2004). Psikologi pendidikan. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian pendidikan. pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tan, O. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation. using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Singapore: Cengage Learning.

Varela, M. F. & Lutnesky, M. M. F. & Osgood M. P. (2005). Assessment of student skills for critiquing published primary scientific literature using a primary trait analysis scale. Journal of Microbiology Education, 6: 20-27.

Wena, M. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer Suatu Tinjauan Konseptual operasional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

White, T. K. & Whitaker, P. (2009). The use of interrupted case studies to enhance critical thinking skills in biology. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 10: 25-31.

Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research design and methods. Washington: COSMOS Corporation

Yustyan, S., Widodo, N., & Pantiwati. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan pembelajaran berbasis scientific approach siswa kelas X SMA Panjura Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 1 (2), 240-254.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v3i1.3906 | Abstract views : 622 | PDF views : 622 |


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia)

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

View JPBI Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.