Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The Economic Innovation Causal Study (SKIE) is a periodical journal published twice a year (March and September). The editor received a public service manuscript that focused on 1) empowering the community economy; 2) development and empowerment of the creative economy; 3) digital-based economic development; 4) development and empowerment of small, micro and medium enterprises (SMEs); and 5) economic empowerment of rural communities.

Studi Kasus Inovasi Ekonomi (SKIE) adalah jurnal pengabdian berkala yang diterbitkan dua kali setahun (Maret dan September). Editor menerima naskah layanan publik yang berfokus pada 1) memberdayakan ekonomi masyarakat; 2) pengembangan dan pemberdayaan ekonomi kreatif; 3) pembangunan ekonomi berbasis digital; 4) pengembangan dan pemberdayaan usaha kecil, mikro dan menengah (UKM); dan 5) pemberdayaan ekonomi masyarakat pedesaan.



Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Studi Kasus Inovasi Ekonomi (SKIE) uses a peer blind review. This process is our attempt to present quality and readable community service journals so that it truly deliver benefits.

Studi Kasus Inovasi Ekonomi (SKIE) menggunakan a peer blind review. Proses ini adalah upaya kami untuk menyajikan jurnal layanan masyarakat yang berkualitas dan dapat dibaca sehingga benar-benar memberikan manfaat kepada masyarakat.


Publication Frequency


Studi Kasus Inovasi Ekonomi (SKIE) is published twice a year in March and September. Each number has five articles.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.


Article processing charge

No article processing fees start the submission until published. We're committed to make all process is transparent and free.

Tidak ada biaya pemrosesan artikel mulai proses submit hingga terbit. Kami berkomitmen untuk membuat semua proses transparan dan gratis.


Review Process and Plagiarism Screening

1. The initial review will focus on the suitability of focus and scope and templates.

2. When it has passed the first stage, the article will be forwarded to the reviewer.

3. After the review process the manuscript will be checked for plagiarism using Turnitin


1. Tinjauan awal akan difokuskan pada kesesuaian focus and scope dan template.

2. Ketika telah lolos pada tahap satu maka artikel akan diteruskan kepada reviewer.

3. Setelah prosesreview manuskrip akan di cek palgiasi menggunakan Turniti


Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

The publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for our journal "Studi Kasus Inovasi Ekonomi (SKIE)". It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher.

Publication decisions
The editor of JIBE is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors
Reporting Standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.