Consumer Preferences toward Goat Milk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/agriecobis.v4i2.15922Abstract
The high level of business competition in this current globalization requires companies to produce quality products. Among the efforts of product improvement is through understanding consumer preferences. This study aims to identify consumer preferences of several attribute combinations of goat milk branded Bumiku Hijau, Yogyakarta. Conjoint analysis with pairwise-comparison was employed in this study. The combination of attributes analyzed were price, flavor variant, types of milk, and packaging. Results showed that the best combination results were obtained on stimuli number 13 with a total usability value of 3.709, which was 0.356 on the product price. The chocolate flavor variant attributes to the largest total usability value of 0.166. Based on the type of milk, the total usability value of powdered milk (skim) is 0.073, and the highest usability value was obtained through carton packaging (200gr) of 0.077. Consumers favored powdered goat milk products with new flavor variants that suit teenagers and adults. They also want 100 gr product packaging as it is easier to measure and consume.
Downloads
References
Agustina, Yohana, Mulyo, Jangkung Handoyo, & Waluyati, Rahayu. (2020). Analisis Pengendalian Mutu Bahan Baku Utama Susu Kambing Bubuk di Bumiku Hijau Yogyakarta. Jurnal Teknosains, 9 (2)(Juni), 91–180.
Ahmedsham, M., Amza, N., & Tamiru, M. (2018). Review on milk and milk product safety , quality assurance and control. International Journal of Livestock Production, 9 (April), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLP2017.0403
Arief, Rusdimasnyah, Sowmen, S., Pazla, R., & Rizqan. (2020). Milk production and quality of Etawa crossbreed dairy goat that given Tithonia diversifolia, corn waste and concentrate based palm kernel cake. Jurnal Biodiversitas, 21(9), 4004–4009. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210910
Bakti, C. S., & Kartika, H. (2020). Analisa pengendalian kualitas produk ice cream dengan metode six sigma. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research (JIEMAR), 1(June), 63–69.
Bolatan, G. I. S., Gozlu, S., Alpkan, L., & Zaim, S. (2016). The Impact of Technology Transfer Performance on Total Quality Management and Quality Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(October), 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.076
Burke, N., Zacharski, K. A., Southern, M., Hogan, P., Ryan, M. P., & Adley, C. C. (2017). The Dairy Industry : Process, Monitoring, Standards, and Quality. In IntechOpen (pp. 1–25).
Cyrilla, L., Purwanto, B. P., Atabany, A., Astuti, D. A., & Sukmawati, A. (2015). Improving Milk Quality for Dairy Goat Farm Development. Media Peternakan, 38(December), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2015.38.3.204
Dabija, A., Mironeasa, S., Oroian, M., & Sion, I. (2018). Study Concerning Milk Quality – Raw Material for Dairy Industry. International Journal of Food Engineering, 4(July), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijfe.4.1.14-21
Idris, I., Sari, R. A., Wulandari, & Uthumporn. (2016). Pengendalian Kualitas Tempe Dengan Metode Seven Tools. Jurnal Teknovasi, 03(1), 66–80.
Kataneh, A. (2017). Processing and Storage stability of Skim Milk Powder Monitoring Early and Advanced Stages of the Maillard Reaction Document Version : Publisher ’ s PDF , also known as Version of record Processing and Storage Stability of Skim Milk Powder. Sweden: Media-tryck, Lund University.
Kushwah, A., & Agarwal, Y. (2017). Study of Quality Testing of Milk Powder in Sterling Agro Industries Limited - Nova. Acta Chemica Malaysia, 1(2), 8–10.
Ma, Y., Dong, W., Fan, C., & Wang, E. (2017). Identification of Cow Milk in Goat Milk by Nonlinear Chemical Fingerprint Technique. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 25(4), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2017.05.008
Montgomery, D. C. (2009). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control 6th Edition (Sixth Edit). USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Perera, P., Munasinghe, H., & Marapana, R. A. U. . (2019). Quality Assessment of Selected Dairy Products in Sri Lankan Market. Hindawi Journal of Food Quality, 1, 1–10.
Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian, K. P. R. (2015). Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Sub Sektor Peternakan Susu. Jakarta.
Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian, K. P. R. (2019). Buku Outlook Komoditas Peternakan Susu Sapi. Jakarta.
Ratnawati, E., Lestari, E. rahayu, & Suhartini, S. (2018). Peta Kendali pada Pengendalian Mutu Udang Beku. J. Tek. Pert., 5(2), 55–63.
Riani, L. P. (2016). Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas Produk Tahu Putih (Studi Kasus Pada Home Industri Tahu Kasih Di Kabupaten Trenggalek). AKADEMIKA, 14(1), 58–63.
Sari, N. K. R., & Purnawati, N. K. (2018). Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas Proses Produksi Pie Susu Pada Perusahaan Pie Susu Di Kota Denpasar. INOBIS : Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen Indonesia, 1(Juni), 290–304.
Sarim, & Ghupta, R. (2017). Usaha Susu Kambing Peranakan Etawa (PE) Produksi Tharraya Farm di Desa Paya Geli Kecamatan Sunggal Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(Juli), 1–8.
Sidartawan, R. (2014). Analisa Pengendalian Proses Produksi Snack Menggunakan Metode Statistical Process Control (SPC). Jurnal ROTOR, 7(November), 2–6.
Tamime, A. Y. (2009). Milk Processing and Quality Management. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Widodo, Rachmawati, A. V., Chulaila, R., & Budisatria, I. G. S. (2012). Produksi dan Evaluasi Kualitas Susu Bubuk Asal Kambing Peranakan etawa (PE). J. Teknol. Dan Industri Pangan, XXIII(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2012.23.2.132
Yana, S. (2015). Analisis Pengendalian Mutu Produk Roti pada Nusa Indah Bakery Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Quality Engineering & Management Journal, 4(1), 17–23.
Yuliyarto, & Yanuar, S. P. (2014). Analisis Quality Control Pada Produksi Susu Sapi di CV Cita Nasional Getasan. Jurnal Among Makarti, 2014(Desember), 79–91.
Zain, W. N. H. (2013). Kualitas Susu Kambing Segar di Peternakan Umban Sari dan Alam Raya Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Peternakan, 10(1), 24–30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 UMM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Agriecobis : Journal of Agricultural Socioeconomics and Business agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Agriecobis : Journal of Agricultural Socioeconomics and Business, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published wor (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
