The Significance of Agricultural Extension Activities for Wetland Rice Farmers in Serang, Indonesia

Authors

  • Eka Noviyanti universitas sultan ageng tirtayasa
  • Yudi L.A Salampessy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/agriecobis.v6i02.28322

Keywords:

Assistence, Extension, Informant, Information

Abstract

In the context of Serang, Indonesia, agricultural extension activities have recently faced challenges related to reduced participation, as observed by the majority of agricultural extension officers. This reduced participation manifests through the limited attendance of farmers in meetings, the passive engagement of farmers and their respective groups in facilitating extension activities, and the generally muted response to agricultural technology content presented during these sessions. Conversely, fostering greater participation in agricultural extension activities can be achieved through coordinated efforts with supportive assistance or the provision of incentives. This study aims to assess the significance of agricultural extension activities for wetland rice farmers in Serang, Indonesia. It adopts a qualitative research approach, focusing on the phenomenology of extension activities within the realm of rice farming in Serang. Data analysis for this study employs Husserl's transcendental phenomenology data analysis method, which is incorporated within the interactive model data analysis framework. The information pertaining to the experiences of agricultural extension activities, as recounted by the informants (farmers), was extracted by identifying specific statements made by the farmer informants during interviews. A total of 133 individual verbatim statements provided by informants were systematically categorized. Three overarching themes, or units of meaning, emerged from this categorization, revealing the essence of agricultural extension activities and the informants' perceptions. These themes are as follows: Extension as a Source of Information, Extension as a Source of Technology, and Extension as a Source of Assistance. They encapsulate the texture and structure of the farmers' experiences with rice farming extension activities. The textural description highlights aspects closely linked to the transmission of information, technology, government initiatives, and assistance delivery. The structural aspect examines the meaning of extension activities within the economic, learning, and participation contexts of the participants. Subsequently, the combined meaning and essence of the rice farming extension experiences for each farmer informant are synthesized, collectively painting a comprehensive picture of their experiences. These experiences extend beyond the acquisition of agricultural knowledge and technology; they also encompass the provision of much-needed assistance for farmers to effectively adopt and implement these innovations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amanah, S. 2007. Makna Penyuluhan dan Transformasi Perilaku Manusia. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.

Batlayeri, M., Adam, F. P., & Far-Far, R. A. 2013. Tingkat Kepuasan Petani Terhadap Penyuluhan Pertanian pada Desa Waiheru Kecamatan Kota Ambon.

Budiman M. F., & Sadono D. 2016. Tingkat Partisipasi dan Kemandirian Petani Alumnsi Sekolah Lapang Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu (Kasus Desa Kebon Pedes, Kecamatan Kebon Pedes, Kabupaten Sukabumi, Provinsi Jawa Barat). Jurnal Penyuluhan. Vol 6 No. 2

Creswell, J.W. 2017. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Edisi Ketiga. Pustaka Pelajar. Jakarta.

Demmallino, E.B. Ibrahim, T. Karim, A. 2018. Petani di Tegah Tambang, Studi Fenomenologi Efek Implementasi Kebijakan Terhadap Kehidupan Petani di Morowali (Studi Kasus Pada Kawasan Lingkar Tambang Kecamatan Bahodopi, Kabupaten Morowali, Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah). Universitas Hasanudin. Makasar

Fadamiro, A. O., Lawal, H. O., & Ogunti, E. O. (2022). Development of A Web Based Agricultural Extension Services Using Knowledge Management (Km). Futa Journal of Engineering and Engineering Technology, 16(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.51459/futajeet.2022.16.1.360

Ferguson, M., Tonkin, E., Brimblecombe, J., Lee, A., Fredericks, B., Cullerton, K., Mah, C. L., Brown, C., McMahon, E., Chatfield, M. D., Miles, E., & Cadet-James, Y. (2023). Communities Setting the Direction for Their Right to Nutritious, Affordable Food: Co-Design of the Remote Food Security Project in Australian Indigenous Communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 2936. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042936

Hamyana, 2017. Motif Kerja Generasi Muda di Bidang Pertanian, Studi Fenomenologi Tentang Motif Kerja di Bidang Pertanian Pada Kelompok Pemuda Tani di Kota Batu. Malang.

Hernanto, F. 1991. Ilmu Usaha Tani. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.

Kottak, C.P. 1988. Bila Manusia yang Utama: Beberapa Hikmah Sosiologi dari ProyekProyek yang Telah Selesai dalam M.M. Cernea (eds). 1988. Mengutamakan Manusia di Dalam Pembangunan: Variabel-variabel Sosiologi di Dalam Pembangunan Pedesaan (Publikasi Bank Dunia). Penerjemah B.B. Teku. Jakarta: UI Press.

Mardikanto T, 1993. Penyuluhan Pembanguna Pertanian. Sebelas Maret University Press. Surakarta.

Miles, Mattew B dan Amichael Huberman. 2007. Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi Rohisi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Mosher, 1985. Menciptakan Struktur Pedesaan Progresif. Cv. Yasaguna. Jakarta.

Moustakas, Clark. 1994. Phenomenological Research Methods. New Delhi : Sage Publications.

Nechully, S., & Pokhriyal, S. K. (2019). Choosing Grounded Theory and Frame Work Analysis as The Appropriate Qualitative Methods for The Research. Journal Of Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.34218/JOM.6.1.2019.014

Purukan, Brigita N dkk. 2021. Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian Dalam Meningkatkan Swasembada Di Kecamatan Ranoyapo Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. 2021. Jurnal Governance. Vol.1, No. 2, 2021. ISSN: 2088-2815.

Putri, C. A. dkk, 2019. Partisipasi Petani dalam Kegiatan Penyuluhan dan Adopsi Pemupukan Padi Sawah di Kecamatan Kersamanah Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Agribisns Terpadu. Vol 12 No.1

Putri, E. dkk. 2019. Daya Saing Sektor Pertanian Tanaman Pangan di Provinsi Banten. Jurnal Agribisnis Terpadu. Untirta.

Rusli, S. 1989. Perkembangan Penduduk dan Masalah Swasembada Pangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Mimbar Sosek, Nomor 3 Desember 1989. Jurusan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, Fakultas Pertanian IPB. Bogor.

Sadono, Dwi. 2008. Pemberdayaan Petani : Paradigma Baru Penyuluhan Pertanian di Indonesia. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.

Setiawan, I Gede. 2005. Masalah-Masalah Penyuluhan Pertanian. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.

Tamsah, H., & Yusriadi, Y. (2022). Quality of agricultural extension on productivity of farmers: Human capital perspective. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.11.003

Tjitropranoto, P. 2003. Penyuluhan Pertanian: Masa Kini dan Masa Depan dalam I. Yustina dan A. Sudradjat (eds). Membentuk Pola Perilaku Manusia Pembangunan: Didedikasikan kepada Prof. Dr. H.R. Margono Slamet. Bogor: IPB Press.

Uphoff, N. 1988. Menyesuaikan Proyek pada Manusia. dalam M.M. Cernea (eds). 1988. Mengutamakan Manusia di Dalam Pembangunan: Variabel-variabel Sosiologi di Dalam Pembangunan Pedesaan (Publikasi Bank Dunia). Penerjemah B.B. Teku. Jakarta: UI Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

Noviyanti, E., & Salampessy, Y. L. (2023). The Significance of Agricultural Extension Activities for Wetland Rice Farmers in Serang, Indonesia. Agriecobis : Journal of Agricultural Socioeconomics and Business, 6(02), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.22219/agriecobis.v6i02.28322

Issue

Section

Articles