PENERAPAN THRESHOLD DALAM PEMILU MENURUT PERSPEKTIF GUSTAV RADBRUCH DAN HANS KELSEN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/audito.v1i2.13973Keywords:
Threshold, Legal Objective, Gustav Radbruch, Hans KelsenAbstract
This study tries to discuss the tensions that occur between legal experts in formulating basic values that become the right legal objectives. Figures that are used as a comparison in the perspective of this legal objective are Gustav Radbruch and Hans Kelsen. Through a conceptual and case approach, this study tries to examine the concept of law based on contextual cases that occur in society, namely the application of the threshold in elections. In this study, the application of the threshold in elections is used as a measuring tool to determine legal objectives as stated by Gustav Radbruch and Hans Kelsen. The results of this study indicate that Gustav Radbruch sees and tends to the value of justice as a legal goal, like what Hans Kelsen found. The difference between Gustav Radburch's justice and Hans Kelsen lies in how to measure and realize this justice. This research is expected to be able to help academics and legal practitioners to dig deeper into the philosophical objectives of law in order to create laws that can answer the needs of society.
Downloads
References
Al-Fatih, S. (2019). Akibat Hukum Regulasi tentang Threshold dalamPemilihan Umum Legislatif dan Pemilihan Presiden: Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 52/PUU-X/2012 dan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013. Jurnal Yudisial, 12(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i1.258
Bodenheimer, E. (1981). Jurisprudence : The Philosophy and Method of Law. In Tesis Ricardo (Fourth Edi, Vol. 53). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Fatih, S. Al. (2018). Implementasi Parliamentary Threshold Dalam Pemilihan Anggota Dprd Provinsi Dan Dprd Kabupaten/Kota. Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2018.6.2.363-388
Hasibuan, R. P. P. M. (2020). Urgensitas Perppu Pilkada di Kala Wabah pandemi Covid-19. Adalah: Buletin Hukum Dan KeadilanAdalah, 4(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v4i1.15503
Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. Jurnal Crepido, 01(01), 13–22. https://doi.org/https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/crepido/article/download/6325/3197
Kelsen, H. (1949). General theory of Law and State. [Teoría general del Derecho y del Estado].
Kennedy, R., & Suhendarto, B. P. (2020). Diskursus Hukum: Alternatif Pola Pengisian Jabatan Kepala Daerah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i2.188-205
Kompas. (2019). Penetapan KPU: 9 Parpol Lolos Parlemen.
Michael, T. (2018). Pergerakan Fakultas Hukum Dalam Dimensi tri Dharma (Modernitas Dan Ortodoks). Prosiding Call For Paper Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Dalam Rangka Dies Natalis Ke-60 Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, 6.
Mukhlishin & Sarip. (2020). KEADILAN DAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM : MENYOAL KONSEP KEADILAN HUKUM HANS KELSEN PERSPEKTIF “AL-„ADL” DALAM AL-QUR’AN. Media Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31764/jmk
Muslih, M. (2013). Negara Hukum Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch. Legalitas, 4(1), 130–152.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi (Cetakan ke). Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CKZADwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Marzuki,+Peter+Mahmud,+(2014),+Penelitian+Hukum,+Cetakan+ke-9,+Jakarta:+Kencana+Media+Group.&hl=id&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiNlIjqlbTpAhXWWisKHWktCXAQ6AEIMjAB#v=onepage&q&f=false
Radbruch, G., Paulson, B. L., Paulson, S. L., Radbruch, G., & Paulson, S. L. (2014). Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy. Oxford Journals of Legal Studies, 26(1), 13–15.
Rizhan, A. (2020). KONSEP HUKUM DAN IDE KEADILAN BERDASARKAN TEORI HUKUM STATIS (NOMOSTATICS)
HANS KELSEN. KODIFIKASI, 2(1), 61–71. Retrieved from http://ejournal.uniks.ac.id/index.php/KODIFIKASI/article/view/679
Rizki, S. C., & Hilman, Y. A. (2020). Menakar Perbedaan Opini Dalam Agenda Pelaksanaan Kontestasi Pilkada Serentak Di Tengah Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 4(2), 143–155. Retrieved from http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/muqoddimah/article/view/1709/996
Sada, H. J. (2016). MANUSIA DALAM PERSPSEKTIF AGAMA ISLAM. Al-Tadzkiyyah : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Samekto, Fxa. (2012). Menggugat Relasi Filsafat Positivisme Dengan Ajaran Hukum Doktrinal. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.1.108
Saputra, A. (2020). MK Bawa Nasib Gugatan Rizal Ramli soal Presidential Threshold ke RPH.
Setiawan, A. (2017). Penalaran Hukum Yang Mampu Mewujudkan Tujuan Hukum Secara Proporsional. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 3(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v3i2.257
Shidiq, G. (2009). TEORI MAQASHID AL-SYARI’AH DALAM HUKUM ISLAM. Majalah Ilmiah Sultan Agung, 44(118). https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.58.4.677
Spaak, T. (2009). Meta-ethics and legal theory: The case of gustav radbruch. Law and Philosophy, 28(3), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-008-9036-8
Syafrida. Hartati, R. (2019). MEWUJUDKAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DAN JAMINAN KEPASTIAN HAK KONSUMEN MUSLIM TERHADAP PRODUK HALAL (SUATU KAJIAN AJARAN GUSTAV RADBRUCH). Jurnal Hukum Replik, 7(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Wardiono, K., & Dimyati, K. (2014). Basis Epistemologis Paradigma Rasional Dalam Ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Deskripsi Tentang Asumsi-Asumsi Dasar Teori Hukum Murni-Hans Kelsen. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(3), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.3.304
Worldometer. (2020). Covid-19 Pandemic (live). Retrieved from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Zubaidi, N., Pratamab, G., & Al-Fatih, S. (2020). Legal Perspective on Effectiveness of Pre-Work Cards for Indonesian People. Jurnal Bestuur, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.42722
