ANALISIS PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN PERADILAN AGAMA TERHADAP NAFKAH PERCERAIAN DALAM PRESPEKTIF HUKUM NASIONAL DAN HUKUM ISLAM BAGI PNS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v2i2.16492Keywords:
Divorce, Income, JudgmentAbstract
Decisions can be executed if, a court decision contains an order for one of the parties to pay a sum of money or vacate a permanent object. Usually, divorce cases that occur will punish the husband to make a payment of some money as a living for the divorced wife after the Religious Court Judge decides. The penalty is in the form of giving 1/3 (one third) of the salary given to the ex-wife and 1/3 (one third) of the others assigned to his child. Based on Government Regulation No. 10 of 1983 jo Government Regulation No. 45 of 1990, the penalty applies to husbands who work as Civil Servants (PNS). In some case adoption of decisions, often not going well even not implemented. Therefore, many respondents demanded the Petitioner to provide several divorce wages, such as mut' ah payments for livelihoods, iddah income, and Ahmadiyah livelihoods, which were carried out before the promise of divorce was pronounced and had to make a living. For sacrifice after the execution of the divorce agreement is canceled. The Panel of Judges will grant such a request, but this request is not for civil servants. So, the authors conducted research using the juridical-normative method to examine the source of law in the Regulations stated in the Religious Court decision. The results obtained that the panel of judges in their decision view that the regulation is only an administrative requirement in each government agency.
Downloads
References
Al-Baihaqi, A. bin al-H. bin ’Ali bin M. A. B. (1994). Sunan al-Baihaqi al-Kubra. Makkah al-Mukarramah: Maktabah Dâr al-Baz.
Al-Daruquthni, ’Ali bin ’Umar Abu al-Hasan. (1966). Sunan al-Daruquthniy. Beirut: Dâr al-Ma’rifah.
Al-Malikiy, A. bin G. bin S. al-N. (n.d.). al-Fawakih al-Diwaniy. Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr.
Al-Nasa`i, A. bin S. A. ’Abd al-R. (1986). Sunan al-Nasa`iy-al-Mujtabi. Halab: Maktab al-Mathbu’at al-Islamiyyah.
Al-Thofina, M. I. N. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perceraian Pegawai Negeri Sipil Tanpa Izin Atasan (Studi Putusan Nomor: 3957/PDT.G/2016/PA.SDA). Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel.
Al-Zuhaili, W. (1998). Fiqh al-Islâmi wa Adillatuh. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Anas, M. bin. (1994). Al – Mudawwamat al – Kubra. Beirut: Dar al – Fikr al – Arabi.
Annas, S. (2017). Masa Pembayaran Beban Nafkah Iddah dan Mut’ah dalam Perkara Cerai Talak (Sebuah Implementasi Hukum Acara di Pengadilan Agama). Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2017.10101
As’adi, E. (2012). Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Perspektif Mediasi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
BKN. (2019). Statistik PNS.
Dahlan, A. A. (2009). Ensiklopedia Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Ictiar Baru Van Hoeven.
Disemadi, H., Al-Fatih, S., & Yusro, M. (2020). Indonesian Children Protection against Commercial Sexual Exploitation through Siri Marriage Practices in Maqashid Al-Shariah Perspective. Brawijaya Law Journal, 7(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2020.007.02.04
Fadri, K., Mukhlis, & Yusrizal. (2020). Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Pembebanan Nafkah Anak Akibat Perceraian Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Suloh, 8(1), 48–69.
Fauzan, & Noerfuady, E. (1997). Problemtika Penerapan Hak Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian. Jakarta: Al-Hikmah & DITBINBAPERA Islam.
Ghazaly, A. R. (2003). Fiqih Munakahat. Jakarta: Prenanda Media.
Hartini. (2009). Pengecualian terhadap Penerapan Asas Ultra Petitum Partium. Jakarta: Mimbar Hukum.
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (A. Yunus, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.
Kasany, A. B. bin M. al –. (2010). Al – badai al – Shana’i. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah.
Mantili, R., & Lubis, S. A. (2017). Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri terhadap Gugatan Perceraian yang tidak dapat Diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) dalam Praktik. ADHAPER, Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 3(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v3i1.47
Mardani. (2012). Hadist Ahkam. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Matondang, A. (2014). Faktor-Faktor yang Mengakibatkan Percerian dalam Perkawinan. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Sosial Politik UMA, 2(2), 141–150.
Nelli, J. (2017). Analisis Tentang Kewajiban Nafkah Keluarga dalam Pemberlakuan Harta Bersama. Al Istinbath, 2(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v2i1.195
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi (Cetakan ke). Jakarta: Kencana.
Purwadarminta, W. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Puspa, Y. P. (1977). Kamus Hukum. Semarang: Aneka.
Qudamah, M. al – D. I. (1997). al- Mughny. Kuwait: Dar Alim al-Kutu.
Sabiq, S. (1998). Fiqh al – Sunnah. Kairo: al – Fath li al – A’lam al – Arabiy.
Saebani, B. A. (2001). Fikih Munakahat (Buku II). Bandung: Pustaka Amani.
Soeroso. (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Subekti. (1983). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Subekti, & Tjitrosoedibjo, R. (1979). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Syaifuddin, M. (2013). Hukum Perceraian. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Syuhada. (2013). Analisis Tentang Konsekuensi Yuridis Harta Bersama Terhadap Kewajiban Suami Memberi Nafkah dalam KHI. Jurnal Tafaqquh, 1(1), 43–64.
Zuhaili, W. al –. (2008). Tafsir al – Munir. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Zuriah, N. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Rendra Widyakso, Fifik Wiryani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
