PEMANTAPAN DIMENSI ETIKA DAN ASAS SEBAGAI PENGUATAN SISTEM HUKUM LINGKUNGAN DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Himas Muhammady Imammullah El Hakim Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v2i3.18041

Keywords:

General Principles, Legal ethic, Environmental Law

Abstract

Humans as social beings who use the environment make the law an instrument of regulation and protection. Laws relating to the environment itself systemically provide both general and specific regulation. However, environmental law instruments still require further development through strengthening of the ethical dimension. Ethics as one of the norms that can be codified and processed through the judiciary can strengthen the implementation of environmental law. The study was conducted by means of a literature study and analysis in order to find ethical positions and opportunities in the environmental law system. The Job Creation Act which directly changes the politics of environmental law certainly presents its own challenges. This development requires encouragement from other systems, one of which is ethics by presenting a positive ethical system as a law of ethics, both code of ethics and court of ethics. ethical law system that specifically regulates environmental law then requires general principles so that the ethical law instrument can take shape and be applied properly. There are several general principles of environmental law ethics, including the principle of clarity of purpose, the principle of independence, the principle of justice, the principle of certainty, the principle of benefit, the principle of balance, the principle of openness and the principle of protection. The challenge of implementing the general principles of environmental law ethics is in both substantial and formal dimensions that can be encouraged by the holders of power as constitutional mandates in the context of realizing the ideals of the state through the implementation of the mandate of the MPR Decree VI/MPR/2001 concerning the Ethics of the Nation's Life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802058

Asshiddiqie, J. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid I. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Atighetchi, D. (2007). Islamic Bioethics : Problems and Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

Bondolfi, A., & Nye, J. (2000). Ethics, Law and Legislation: The Institutionalisation of Moral Reflection. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 3(1), 27–37.

Chroust, A. H., & Osborn, D. L. (1942). Aristotle’s Conception of Justice. Notre Dame Law Review, 17(2), 129–143.

Dagan, H. (2004). The Law and Ethics of Restitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Douzinas, C., & Warrington, R. (1994). Justice Miscarried : Ethics and Aesthetics in Law. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

French, F. C. (1893). The Concept of Law in Ethics. The Philosophical Review, 2(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2176068

Head, M., & Man, S. (2005). Law in Persoective : Ethics, Society and Critical Thinking. Sydney: UNSW Press.

Hudha, A. M., Husanah, & Rahardjanto, A. (2019). Etika Lingkungan : Teori dan Prakti Pembelajarannya. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Press.

Luban, D. (2007). Legal Ethics and Human Dighnity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, D. (1984). Ethics and The Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Revisi). Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Moore, G. E. (2002). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Orgard, L. (2010). The Preamble in Constitution Interpretation. I-CON, 8(4), 714–738.

Pufendorf, S. (2009). Two Books of The Elements of Universal Jurisprudence. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Quasem, M. A. (1988). Etika Al Ghazali. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka.

Ross, D., & Stratton-Lake, P. (2007). The Right and The Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252653.001.0001

Said, M. Y., & Yati, N. (2020). Paradigma Filsafat Etika Lingkungan dalam Menentukan Arah Politik Hukum Lingkungan. Al’ Adl Jurnal Hukum, 12(1), 39–60.

Santoso, A. (2012). Hukum, Moral dan Keadilan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Soper, P. (2002). The Ethics if Deference : Learning from Law’s Morals. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Syarif, L. M., & Wibisana, A. G. (2015). Hukum Lingkungan : Teori, Legislasi dan Studi Kasus. Jakarta: Kemitraan Partnerhip.

Syed, M. U. (2017). Coercion and Responsibility in Islam : A Study in Erhics and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tarlock, A. (1996). Environmental Law : Ethics or Science? Duke Environment Law and Policy Forum, 7(193), 193–223.

Ward, S. J. A. (2011). Ethics and Media : An Introduction. Madison: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977800

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Himas Muhammady Imammullah El Hakim. (2021). PEMANTAPAN DIMENSI ETIKA DAN ASAS SEBAGAI PENGUATAN SISTEM HUKUM LINGKUNGAN DI INDONESIA. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 2(3), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v2i3.18041