REVOCATION OF BUSINESS COMPETITION SUPERVISORY COMMISSION DECISIONS OVER CARTEL-RELATED CASES IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Herwastoeti Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v2i3.18167

Keywords:

revocation of decision, Cartel, KPPU

Abstract

Business Competition Supervisory Commission (henceforth KPPU), a law enforcement body in Indonesia, was established based on Antimonopoly Law. This commission is a quasi-judicial body holding executorial authority over business competition-related cases. The crucial issue is apparent when business people submit petitions to the District Court since, from this point, different approaches and treatments between the KPPU and the District Court are revealed. This weak legal procedure, especially regarding the efforts made for petitions, is often seen as an opportunity by business people to stand against the decisions of the KPPU by submitting petitions to District Court, and several cartel-related cases have been reinforced by Supreme Court. This research employed normative-juridical methods involving secondary data that were further analyzed by emphasizing juridical aspects for the analysis of the qualitative analysis method to present a description, from which a conclusion and recommendations were drawn. With it, decisions of the KPPU would not be labeled weak in law enforcement concerning business competition. Moreover, this approach is intended to deter business people regarding the violations of Law concerning Antimonopoly especially those regarding cartels which not only harm business people, but also the members of public in general.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afrizal Mukti Wibowo. (2021). PERBANDINGAN HUKUM ARBITRASE DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ARBITRASE ONLINE INDONESIA DAN CINA. Audito Comparative Law Journal, 2(2), 110–118. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/audito/article/view/16372/9349

Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2020.102168

Jusmadi, R. (2014). Konsep Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Sejarah, Perdangan Bebas, dan Pengaturan Merger – Akuisis. Setara Press.

Ningrum, R. P., Arief, S., & Herwastoeti. (2021). ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO.2871K/PDT/2017 DALAM KASUS PENGINGKARAN AKTA PERJANJIAN PERDAMAIAN NO.04/PDT.G/2000/PN.PROB. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 1(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.22219/ILREJ.V1I1.16126

Nugroho, S. A. (2012). Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia Dalam Teori dan Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Rokan, M. K. (2010). Hukum Persaingan Usaha. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007

Sirait, N. N. (2003). Asosiasi dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Pustaka Bangsa Press.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2018). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. In Rajawali Press. Rajawali Press.

Sonata, D. L. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283

Yuliana Wahyuningtyas, S. (2019). Competition and Regulation in Network Industries. 20(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591719834864

Zaid, Z., Dawaki, F. A., & Ololade, S. K. (2021). Should the State Control Tariffs? Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 8(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.18196/JGPP.811340

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Herwastoeti. (2021). REVOCATION OF BUSINESS COMPETITION SUPERVISORY COMMISSION DECISIONS OVER CARTEL-RELATED CASES IN INDONESIA. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 2(3), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v2i3.18167