Diversion Of Recidivist Children According To Utilitarianism Aspects

Authors

  • Arifah Uswatun Kossah Magister Ilmu Hukum, Direktorat Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Sidik Sunaryo Magister Ilmu Hukum, Direktorat Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v3i3.21681

Keywords:

Child, Recidivist, Diversi, Utilitarianism

Abstract

In an act against legal norms, especially criminal law, children must be treated differently from adults. This is because children are a group of naturally weak people children who commit crimes should be lighter than those adults through what is known as restorative justice and Diversion (Indonesian law says it “Diversi”). However, then, Article 7 paragraph (2) of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law (Indonesian: UU SPPA), basically states that Diversi is only carried out if the criminal penalty for the act is less than 7 (seven) years and is not a repetition of a crime. Utilitarianism or Utilism puts benefit as the main goal of Benefit here is defined as happiness. So, good or bad or fair or not a law depends on whether the law gives happiness to humans or not. Through a normative juridical study that emphasizes the review of laws and literature studies, the authors find that a utilitarian review of Diversi to recidivist children is very likely to produce broad benefits for many people and has the potential to close the possibility of recidivist children committing criminal acts again. This is because, in Diversi, the benefits of overcoming the consequences of children's actions can be felt by the perpetrator's child, the victim, and their respective families through mutual agreement. In line with that, the principles of implementing the SPPA Law confirm that children must be addressed especially for the protection of their growth and development and to eliminate discrimination that differentiates the process between one child and another. It is hoped that with this literature review, legal products regarding juvenile justice can participate in guaranteeing the rights of recidivism children in Diversi as a method of overcoming crime by children.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abeth, H. J. (2017). Restorative Justice Sebagai Langkah Menuju Penegakan Hukum Pidana Modern Dan Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum “THE JURIS,” 1(2), 129.

Aji, W. S. (2019). The Implementation of Diversion and Restorative Justice in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 4(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v4i01.23339

Ali, A. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Jakarta: Kencana.

Aulia, F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2017). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law dan Islamic Law dalam Perspektif Sejarah dan Karakteristik Berpikir . Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25(1), 98–113. Retrieved from http://202.52.52.22/index.php/legality/article/view/5993

Bentham, J. (1984). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.

Buchanan, A., & Mathieu, D. (1986). Philosophy and Justice BT - Justice: Views from the Social Sciences (R. L. Cohen, ed.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3511-3_2

BURNS, J. H. (2005). Happiness and Utility: Jeremy Bentham’s Equation. Utilitas, 17(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0953820804001396

Christians, C. G. (2007). Utilitarianism in Media Ethics and Its Discontents. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(2–3), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520701315640

Cragg, W. (2003). The practice of punishment: Towards a theory of restorative justice. The Practice of Punishment: Towards a Theory of Restorative Justice, 1–214. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203406823/PRACTICE-PUNISHMENT-WESLEY-CRAGG

Darmodiharjo. (1995). Produk-produk Filsafat Hukum: Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramdida Pustaka Utama.

DIPA RUDIANA, I. N., & RAI SETIABUDHI, I. K. (2021). Reconstruction of the Diversion Concept in a Child Criminal Jurisdiction System Based on Dignified Justice. PRIZREN SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 5(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v5i1.210

Dwijayanti, M. (2017). Diversi Terhadap Recidive Anak. Rechtidee, 12(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v12i2.3244

Erdianti, R. N., & Al-Fatih, S. (2019a). Fostering as an Alternative Sanction for Juveniles in the Perspective of Child Protection in Indonesia. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 4(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.15294/JILS.V4I01.29315

Erdianti, R. N., & Al-Fatih, S. (2019b). Mewujudkan Desa Layak Anak Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Di Indonesia. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 305–318. Retrieved from http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/Justitia/article/view/3648/2361

Hariyanto, E. (2019). INTERRELASI PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM DAN POLITIK MENUJU TATANAN KEHIDUPAN MASYARAKAT MODERN DAN DEMOKRATIS. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 1(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v1i1.2555

Hernawarman, K., & Santiago, F. (2022). Regulation of Child Criminal Action Through Diversion in the Child Criminal System. Proceedings of the First Multidiscipline International Conference, MIC 2021, October 30 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315736

Jatnika, D. C., Mulyana, N., & Raharjo, S. T. (2016). RESIDIVIS ANAK SEBAGAI AKIBAT DARI RENDAHNYA KESIAPAN ANAK DIDIK LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DALAM MENGHADAPI PROSES INTEGRASI KE DALAM MASYARAKAT. Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/jppm.v3i2.13691

Komariah, K., & Cahyani, T. (2016). EFEKTIFITAS KONSEP DIVERSI DALAM PROSES PERADILAN ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MENURUT UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 24(2).

Lubis, M. R., & Putra, P. S. (2021). PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 4(1), 226. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i1.3354

May, J., Osmond, K., & Billick, S. (2014). Juvenile Delinquency Treatment and Prevention: A Literature Review. Psychiatric Quarterly, 85(3), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-014-9296-4

Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Muchsin. (2011). Perlindungan Anak Dalam Prespektif Hukum Positif (Tinjauan Hukum Administrasi Negara, Hukum Perdata, dan Hukum Pidana). In Varia Peradilan Tahun XXVI No. 308 Juli 2011 (p. 23). Jakarta: IKAHI.

Muhadar, A. . S. and M. (2013). Filsafat Hukum (Teori dan Praktif). Jakarta: Kencana.

Rismanto, R. (2021). The Process Of Settlement Of Criminal Actions With Children Through Approach Restorative Justice. Veteran Justice Journal, 2(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.33005/vjj.v2i2.43

Rosidah, N. (2012). Pembaharuan Ide Diversi Dalam Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Anak Di Indonesia. Undip: Masalah-Masalah Hukum Journal, 41(2), 182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.41.2.2012.179-188

Satria, H. (2018). RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: PARADIGMA BARU PERADILAN PIDANA. Jurnal Media Hukum, 25(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2018.0107.111-123

Seiter, R. P., & Kadela, K. R. (2003). Prisoner Reentry: What Works, What Does Not, and What Is Promising. Crime & Delinquency, 49(3), 360–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128703049003002

Setyowati, D. (2020). Diversion in the Child Criminal Justice System as an Effort to Implement Restorative Justice. Unram Law Review, 4(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v4i1.108

Soetojode, W. (2007). Hukum Pidana Anak. Bandung: Refka Aditama.

Usman, A. H. (2015). Kesadaran hukum masyarakat dan pemerintah sebagai faktor tegaknya negara hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 30(1), 26–53.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-05

How to Cite

Kossah, A. U., & Sunaryo, S. (2022). Diversion Of Recidivist Children According To Utilitarianism Aspects. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 3(3), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v3i3.21681