Confiscation Of Assets In Economic Crime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v3i2.22185Keywords:
corruption crimes; economic analysis of law; confiscation of assetsAbstract
Corruption is an extraordinary crime so the punishment is the Primum Remedium. Economic Analysis of Law can be used to increase the efficiency of handling corruption crimes (TPK) to provide a level of efficiency and a deterrent effect. The formulation of the problem in this research is how is the economic analysis of law in maximizing the looted assets from the crime of corruption? This research is based on judicial normative. The data were collected using the search method and literature review. Conclusion Based on the economic analysis of law, the shift in the orientation of punishment in criminal acts of corruption from corporal punishment to a combination of corporal punishment, large fines, confiscation of assets, and impoverishment of perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption without diminishing the meaning of corporal punishment shows effectiveness and efficiency and will increase the deterrent effect for the perpetrator.
Downloads
References
Agustine, O. V. (2019). RUU Perampasan Aset Sebagai Peluang dan Tantangan dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Hukum Pidana Dan Pembangunan Hukum, 1(2), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.25105/hpph.v1i2.5546
Al-Fatih, S. (2018). DARUS AS AN ANTI-CORRUPTION EDUCATION. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 3(1), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.18.03.01.14
Arizon Mega Jaya. (2017). Implementation of Asset Deprivation of Criminal Act of Corruption. Cepalo, 1(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v1no1.1752
Cahyani, T. D., & Al-Fatih, S. (2020). Peran Muhammadiyah dalam pencegahan dan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di kota batu. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.18.03.01.14.Volume
Eddy O. S. Hiariej. (2020). Korupsi di Sektor Swasta dan Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(3), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.4.2020.333-344
Fernando, Z. J., Pujiyono, P., & Rochaeti, N. (2022). Perampasan Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(1), 34–45.
Handriani, A. (2018). Keabsahan Perjanjian Jual Beli Secara Tidak Tertulis Berdasarkan Hukum Perdata. Rechtsregel, 1(2), 67–87.
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (A. Yunus, ed.). Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.
Kurniyawan, A., & Hasanah, Y. N. (2020). Peran Rupbasan sebagai Lembaga Pengelolaan Barang Sitaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Reformasi Hukum, 24(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v24i1.106
Latifan, M. (2015). Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana di Indonesia. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 6(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v6i1.244
Monica, S., Mukhlisin, M., & Fatah, D. A. (2020). Enhancing Waqf Accountability: Nazhir’s Perspective towards Waqf Reporting. Al-Iqtishad Journal of Islamic Economics, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v12i2.15828
Nur Ainiyah Rahmawati. (2013). Ultimum Remedium dan Primum Remedium Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Recidive, 2(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v2i1.32002
Rahayuningsih, T. (2013). Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Perbankan Dalam Rangka Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. RechtIdee, vol.8(2). https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v8i2.693
Rahmayanti. (2018). Urgensi Civil Forfeiture Untuk Meningkatkan Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Prima Indonesia(IHP), Vol.1(No.1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihap.v1i1.70
Salam, S., Suhartono, R. M., & La Dee, M. (2021). Construction of the Concept of Building Populist Economic Law. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 2(3), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v2i3.17494
Santos, R. (2021). Prosedur Pelaksanaan Mutual Legal Assistance Tehadap Pemulihan Ases Hasil Korupsi Yang Dilarikan Ke Luar Negeri (Procedures for the Implementation of Mutual Legal Assistance to Recover Assets Resulting from Corruption that are Rushed Abroad). Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, Vol.2(No, 1), 40–56.
Saputra, R. (2017a). Nasib Malang RUU Perampasan Aset. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 3(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i1.158
Saputra, R. (2017b). Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Nonconviction Based Asset Forfeiture) Dalam Ruu Perampasan Aset Di Indonesia. Integritas, Vol. 3, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i1.158
Subiharta. (2015). MORALITAS HUKUM DALAM HUKUM PRAKSIS SEBAGAI SUATU KEUTAMAAN (Legal Morality in Practical Law as a Virtue). Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 4(3), 385–398.
Sudwijayanti, S. (2017). Economic Analysis of Law Terhadap Pemidanaan Insider Trading dalam Proses Merger Sebagai Kejahatan Korporasi. DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(25), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v13i25.2227
Sugiharto. (2012). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Dan Sekilas Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Beberapa Negara. In Jurnal Online Internasional & Nasional Vol. 7 No.1, Januari – Juni 2019 Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta (Vol. 53). Uninssula Press.
Sulistyorini, I., & Zulaekhah, S. (2018). Economic Analysis of Law Pada Perubahan Kebijakan Kontrak Karya Menjadi Ijin Usaha Pertambangan Khusus (IUPK): Studi Kasus Pt. Freeport Indonesia. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 17(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v17i2.544
Supit, A. A. (2016). Prapenuntutan dalam KUHAP dan Pengaruh Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indoneisa. Lex Crimen, V(1), 99–106.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sulvia Triana Hapsari, Abdul Madjid, Nurini Aprilianda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
