Requirements for Application for Cancellation of Peace and Analysis of Decision Concerning Cancellation of Peace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i3.28838Keywords:
Debt Payment, Peace, Terms of CancellationAbstract
This writing intends to examine the judge’s ruling on the terms of the peace annulment application. The key focus and main objective of the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations revolves around the Settlement process, aiming to achieve a peace proposal in accordance with Article 281 of the Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Law, commonly referred to as Law Number 37 of 2004. This occurs within the framework of the Commercial Court's management of the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations case. If the debtor fails to keep their promise or fulfill the terms of the peace agreement, there is a legal solution to request the annulment of the peace. This research employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach to comprehensively and deeply describe the circumstances or symptoms studied in relation to the conditions for peace annulment applications and the application of these conditions to Decision Number 2/Pdt.Sus-Cancellation of Peace/2023/PN.Niaga Sby Jo. Number 69/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN.Niaga Sby. It can be analyzed from the research that the regulations for requesting the annulment of a peace agreement are already established in Law Number 37 of The Year 2004. Article 170, along with Article 171 and Article 291 of the same law, forms the legal basis for the request, specifically addressing issues related to bankruptcy and the postponement of debt payment obligations.
Downloads
References
Aditya Fauzi Indarto, Siti Mahmudah, H. S. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Permohonan Pembatalan Putusan Perdamaian (Homologasi) Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Intidana (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 14/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN Smg Jo. Nomor 10/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2015/PN.Niaga.Smg Jo. Nomor 1292 K/Pdt.Sus- Pailit/2020). Diponegoro Law Journal, 11(2).
Agitha, A. P. A. H., & Afriana, A. (2021). Penundaan Pengesahan Perdamaian Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Oleh Hakim Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 3(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v3i1.564
Casanova, F. Y. (2017). Analisis Putusan Homologasi Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Pkpu) Sebagai Upaya Pencegah Terjadinya Kepailitan (Studi Putusan No. 59/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2014/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst). In Lampung University. https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf
Christiawan, R. (2020). Hukum Kepailitan & Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Indonesian Civil Code, (1848).
Surabaya District Court Decision Number 2/Pdt.Sus-Pembatalan Perdamaian/2018/PN Niaga Sby, (2018).
Supreme Court Decision Number 963 K/Pdt.Sus-Bankrupt/2020, (2020). https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/e8da2ce10914c30ab1f93520e8049d8e.html
F, A. Z. & M. A. T. (2021). Konsekuensi Hukum Pembatalan Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) pada Kasus PT. Mopoli Raya. Banua Law Review, 3(2), 152–161.
Fuady, M. (2017). Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktek. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Gede Nira Wicitra Yudha, Budiartha, I. N. P., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2022). Akibat Hukum Penolakan Rencana Perdamaian Debitur oleh Kreditur dalam Proses Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 3(1), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.3.1.4447.196-200
Ginting, E. R. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan Buku Kedua Rapat-Rapat Kreditor. Sinar Grafika.
Ibrahim, J. (2008). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayu Media Publishing.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, Republic of Indonesia (2004). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/40784
Iqbal Tamrin, Ermanto Fahamsyah, A. C. S. (2021). Akta Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Dalam Hukum Kepailitan. Journal of Economic and Business Law Review, 1(2), 43–59.
Jacinda, I., & Atalim, S. (2019). Analisis Putusan Pembatalan Perjanjian Perdamaian Homologasi Pada Kasus Kepailitan Pt Njonja Meneer (Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Semarang Nomor 11/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/Pn Niaga Smg. Jo. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1397 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 2(1), 692. https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5257
Nurbaiti, T. R. & S. (2019). Homologasi Sebagai dasar Pembatalan Permohonan Pailit PT. Nusantara Sentosa Raya Dan PT. Alam Abadi Perkasa (Studi Terhadap Putusan Nommor 150 PK/PDT. SUS/Pailit/2018). Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 1(2).
Safitri, N. A., & Bintoro, R. W. (2020). Upaya Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Kepailitan Tentang Pembatalan Homologasi (Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Nomor 1 / Pdt . Sus . Pembatalan Perdamaian / 2018 / PN Niaga Sby Jo Putusan Nomor 43 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019)). Soedirman Law Review, 2(2).
Sastrawidjaja, M. S. (2006). Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Alumni.
Silalahi, U., & Tanjung, B. (2021). Perjanjian Perdamaian pada Proses Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berulang: Kedudukan dan Implikasi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 371–401. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.2.371-401
Sinaga, S. M. (2012). Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia. PT. Tatanusa.
Sjahdeni, S. R. (2002). Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Faillisementsverordening Juncto Undang-undang No. 4 Tahun 1998. PT. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Soekanto, S., & Mamuji, S. (2004). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Cetakan ke). PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suyatno, R. A. (2012). Pemanfaatan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Sebagai Upaya Mencegah Kepailitan. Kencana.
Yunari, L. G. C. P. & S. B. (2022). Kriteria Proposal Perdamaian PKPU Yang Cukup Terjamin Dalam Kasus KSP Indosurya Cipta. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 4(3), 607–616.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gilbert Firdaus, Dewi Sulistianingsih, Pujiono Pujiono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
