The Concept of Legal Certainty in The Final and Binding Decision of The Election Manager Honorary Council (DKPP)

Authors

  • Rista Choirun Nisaq Master of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Catur Wido Haruni Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Surya Anoraga Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v5i1.29295

Keywords:

Final, Binding, DKPP, Certainty

Abstract

The final and binding phrase on the DKPP decision in the provisions of Article 458 paragraph (13) of the Election Law was submitted for judicial review through the Constitutional Court decision Number RI 32/PUU-XIX/2021. In the provisions of Article 458 paragraph (13), the phrase final and binding means that the DKPP's decision can’t be submitted for legal effort. However, from the case of Evi Novida Eka Ginting, the Election Organizer Ethics Council (DKPP) decision can be submitted for legal effort. This has implications for the legal certainty of the final and binding phrase in the provisions of Article 458 paragraph (13). This research aims to analyze the final and binding decisions of the Election Organizer Ethics Council in terms of the Constitutional Court Decision Number.32/PUU-XIX/2021 and Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning Elections and to analyze the Election Organizer Ethics Council decisions. which is final and binding in terms of the aspect of legal certainty. The research method used is normative juridical. Based on the results of the research and discussion, First, viewed from the Constitutional Court decision no. 32/PUU-XIX/2021 the phrase "final and binding" in Article 458 paragraph (13) can be an object in the Administrative Court. What can be submitted is a legal effort, a lawsuit to the Administrative Court (PTUN) to cancel the Presidential Decree. Reviewed according to Law No.7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, Article 458 paragraph (13), the Election Organizer Ethics Council (DKPP) decision is final and binding, this means that the decision cannot be made to legal effort and directly can be held. Second, according to the principle of legal certainty, final and binding phrases cause legal uncertainty. Because the phrase is final and binding on the DKPP decision, it is interpreted that the Election Organizer Ethics Council (DKPP) decision can’t be made due to legal effort and must be held. So the final phrase in Article 458 paragraph (13) should be removed cause the meaning has multiple interpretations.    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Siboy dan Dewi Cahyandari. (2022). Relasi Putusan DKPP dan PTUN dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik Penyelenggara Pemilu. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(3).

Al-Fatih, S. (2023). Perkembangan Metode Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia (1st ed.). Malang: UMM Press.

Al-Fatih, S., & Siboy, A. (2021). Menulis Artikel Karya Ilmiah Hukum di Jurnal Nasional dan Internasional Bereputasi. Malang: Inteligensia Media.

Ansari, T., & Negara, S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/ACLJ.V4I1.24855

Cristiya Putranti. (2019). Analisis Sifat Final dan Mengikat Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu ditinjau Dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 31/PUU-IX/2013 dan Undang – Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Erwin Moeslimin Singajuru. (2022). Menggagas Pembentukan Mahkamah Pemilu di Indonesia. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Fitria Chusna Farisa. (n.d.). MK Kabulkan Sebagian Permohonan Uji Materi UU Pemilu soal Putusan DKPP Final dan Mengikat.

Harmoko M Said. (2021). Menggagas Peradilan Etik Penyelenggara Negara di Indonesia. SASI, 27(1).

Humas MK RI. (n.d.). Pemerintah : Sifat Putusan Final dan Mengikat DKPP Berbeda dengan Lembaga Peradilan.

Ida Budhiati. (2020). Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Kepastian Hukum Pemilu: Tafsir Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap UUD NRI Tahun 1945 untuk Kepastian Hukm Pemilu. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Idul Rishan. (2017). Justifikasi Pelembagaan Peradilan Etik. Dialogia Iuridica, 9(1).

Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections.

Republic of Indonesia Constitusional Court. (n.d.). Sifat Putusan Final dan Mengikat DKPP Hapus Mekanisme Koreksi oleh PTUN.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Utang Rosidin dan A. Rusdiana. (2018). Pengantar Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Uu Nurul Huda. (2018). Hukum Partai Politik dan Pemilu Indonesia. Bandung: Fokusmedia.

Winata, M. R. (2020). JUDICIAL RESTRAINT DAN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION TERHADAP KOMPETENSI MENGADILI PELANGGARAN PEMILIHAN UMUM TERSTRUKTUR, SISTEMATIS, DAN MASIF. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i4.663

Zulkifli Aspan. (2022). Analisis Final dan Mengikat Putusan Dewan Kehormatan penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal APHTN - HAN, 1(1).

Downloads

Published

2023-12-19

How to Cite

Nisaq, R. C., Haruni, C. W., & Anoraga, S. (2023). The Concept of Legal Certainty in The Final and Binding Decision of The Election Manager Honorary Council (DKPP). Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v5i1.29295