Fenomena konformitas kelompok biseksual pada mahasiswa

Authors

  • Alheysha Azalia Ihsan Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Eva Meizara Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Faradillah Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v10i1.18308

Abstract

Every social group has norms to influence its fellow members. One of the influences that occur in a social group is conformity. However, conformity can have a negative impact on a group, especially the intervention of sexual orientation deviation. This study uses a case study approach to determine the conformity process that occurs in a bisexual group. The respondents of this study were eight active student respondents at universities in Makassar City, including four students with bisexual status and each significant other. Respondents were collected by using snowball sampling method. Data analysis was carried out by coding data in the form of thematic analysis in describing the data obtained. Verification of this research data using data triangulation techniques. The results showed that the conformity process that occurs in organizations and communities can be influenced by the influence of group size and attraction that changes beliefs by dominant bisexual groups to non-bisexual groups. The implication of this research refers to students being more selective and applying awareness when joining social groups so as not to fall into the LGBT network, especially bisexuals.

 

Keywords

bisexual, conformity, students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior (2nd ed.). UK: McGraw Hill.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). DSM IV TR. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Baron, R. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2012). Social psychology (13th ed.). London: Pearson.

Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2005). Psikologi sosial jilid 2 (edisi kesepuluh). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: SAGE.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. California: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Crooks, R., & Baur, K. (2008). Our sexuality (10th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

DEPKES. RI. (2000). Pedoman penggolongan dan diagnosis gangguan jiwa III(PPDGJ-III). Direktorat Kesehatan Jiwa Depkes RI.

Gross, R. (2012). Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour (6th ed). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hadori, M. (2015). Aktualisasi diri (self-actualization): Sebuah manifestasi puncak potensi individu berkepribadian sehat, (sebuah konsep teori dinamika-holistik Abraham Maslow). Jurnal Lisan Al-Hal. 9(2), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.35316/lisanalhal.v9i2.92

Idris & Fahira. (2016). Propaganda LGBT di Indonesia: FGD bahaya LGBT bagi tatanan sosial budaya bangsa Indonesia. Jakarta: Fraksi PKS DPR RI.

Myers, D. G. (2010). Social psychology (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Nugroho, S. C., Siswati, & Sakti, H. (2010). Pengambilan keputusan menjadi homoseksual pada laki-laki usia dewasa awal: Sebuah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan fenomenologi (skripsi). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Pervin, L., A & Cervone, D. (2012). Kepribadian: Teori dan penelitian (edisi kesepuluh). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Phillips, E. (2021). From the agent’s point of view: the case against disjunctivism about rationalisation. Philosophical Explorations, 24(2), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2021.1908581

Sandfort, T. G. M & Dodge, B. (2008). And then there was the down low: Introduction to black and latino male bisexualities. National Institute of Health, 37(5), 675-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9359-4

Sarwono, W. S. (2011). Teori–teori psikologi sosial. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sears, D.O., Freedman, J.L., & Peplau, L. A. (1985). Psikologi sosial jilid 2 (edisi kelima). Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Sulistiani, S. (2016). Kejahatan dan penyimpangan seksual. Penerbit Nuansa Aulia: Bandung.

Ucu, K. R. (2020). LGBT tak Lagi persoalan individu tapi semakin terorganisasi. Republika.co.id. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/qiuobu282/lgbt-tak-lagi-persoalan-individu-tapi-semakin-terorganisasi.

Vitasandy, T. D. & Zulkaida, A. (2010). Konsep diri pria biseksual. Jurnal Psikologi, 3(2), 189-190.

Wiener, J. M. & Breslin, N. A. (1995). The behavioral science in psychiatry. New York: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-10

How to Cite

Ihsan, A. A., Dewi, E. M. P., & Faradillah, F. (2022). Fenomena konformitas kelompok biseksual pada mahasiswa . Cognicia, 10(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v10i1.18308

Issue

Section

Articles