KETENTUAN PIDANA DENDA BAGI PELAKU ANAK DAN RELEVANSINYA DENGAN IDE INDIVIDUALISASI PIDANA (Studi Kritis Terhadap UU No. 3 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pengadilan Anak)

Abstract

(Basically, because of child is judicially viewed as law subyek having the specially character of its ability of his act he must treated proper child peculiarly also. A child in a condition any have to remain to obtain;get guarantee judicially, that he will obtain;get protection to best importance [of] him to be able to grow and expand healthyly is, well-balanced, harmony and compatible either through physical and also by psikhis
Indonesian Act Number 3 year 1997 about Justice of Child not yet given protection maximally to importance of child especially having problem with its relate to rule of crime fine to child. Rule of crime fine to child which [s arranged in Indonesian Act Number 3 year 1997 still viewed as very norm represif, considering its rule only relied on principle responsibility of crime pursuant to criminal responsibility. Usage of principle responsibility of crime pursuant to mistake in Indonesian Act Number 3 year 1997 resulting possibility inexistence transferring of crime fine to child others including old fellow or his sponsor. Hence require to be thought it over possibility adopting of principle responsibility of substitution crime in Indonesian Number 3 year 1997 about Justice of Child).