KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP UU NO.12 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PERUBAHAN KEDUA ATAS UU NO.32 TAHUN 2008 MENGENAI TERBUKANYA CALON PERSEORANGAN DALAM PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH SECARA LANGSUNG

Abstract

As follow-up of Decision Of Lawcourt Constitution of No.5/Puu-V/2007 about repeal to rule
of section 59 article 1 UU No.32 year 2004tersebut, hence invited UU N0. 12 Year 2008 about
second Change of UU No.32 Year 2004, in section 56 sentence ( 2) “ Candidate couple as referred
to [at] sentence ( 1) proposed by political party, aliance of paratai political, or civil fulfilling conditions
as provisions in this Code” and section 59 sentence ( 1)” Participant of election of regional leader
and regional leader proxy [is]: candidate a.pasangan proposed by political party or political party
aliance b. civil candidate couple supported by a number of people.
Pursuant to result of research that arrangement of civil candidate in stock election of regional
leader directly in No.12 Year 2008 About second Change of UU No.32 Year 2004, there are some
problemss, like in rule of Section 59 Code of No. 12 Year 2008 requiring the existence of support 3-
6,5 pursuant to amount of resident in every area., this condition enough weigh against, because
percentage overrated the., the rule exactly become barrier to civil candidate to go forward in election
of regional leader ( Pilkada). Verification Evidence civil candidate support have to carefully dilakukakan
and require old time, therefore require adequate energy and also the expense of which by dozens.
[At] Regional Leader [relation/link] side of civil candidate ( if is chosen ) with DPRD, hence Regional
leader of civil candidate will get strong resistensi of DPRD, is so that needed by many political
compromise and accomodation. Thereby, civil candidate do not fully guarantee governance clean in
culture governance of us. In is in perpective of society of[is existence of civil candidate will add
alternative to leader candidate choice. Apparition of civil candidate of course