Mengungkap Potensi Fraud Dan Upaya Pencegahannya Di Perusahaan X

Authors

  • Priyo Budi Prakoso Magister Akuntansi, Universitas Gajayana Malang, Malang, Jawa Timur
  • Bambang Haryadi Magister Akuntansi, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Madura, Jawa Timur
  • Oyong Lisa Magister Akuntansi, Universitas Gajayana Malang, Malang, Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v5i3.21101

Keywords:

Control Systems, Financial Statement, Fraud

Abstract

Any weakness of a control in the company will have the potential for fraud. Those who have more ability to take advantage of this gap will benefit from their actions.  Weaknesses of a control, error of recording to incomplete supporting evidence can be the cause of potential fraud. The object of the study is Unit S in Company X. This study provides results that there is still weak control in Unit S, and there are still many recording errors that are not based on fundamental evidence in presenting figures on financial statements. That is, it has the potential to cause fraud in Unit S. fraud which is most worried is the existence of fraud in terms of profit management. Some prevention that can be done is to change or improve the existing control system and complete the supporting evidence in the next period. This research is expected to be a suggestion for companies to be more careful and immediately correct the weaknesses that occur, so that this does not become the cause of potential fraud in the company in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullahi, R. U. (2015). Fraud Triangle Theory, and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent, and Divergent for Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences: 5(4), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v5-i4/1823

ACFE (2012). Report to the Nations: Occupational Fraud and Abuse.

ACFE (2014). Report to the Nations: Occupational Fraud and Abuse.

ACFE (2016). Report to the Nations: Occupational Fraud and Abuse.

Albrecht, W. S., et al. (2012). Fraud Examination, 5E. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Artati, A. K. and S. Noviyanti (2020). Fraud Risk Assessment: Experimental Study On The Alternative Fraud Model And Auditor Risk Preferences. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan 10 (1), 21 - 37. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v10i1.11430

Asya'ri, M. A., et al. (2013). "Peran dan Fungsi Satuan Pengawasan Intern dalam Pencegahan Fraud pada Perguruan TInggi X " Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting, 1(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.21107/jaffa.v1i2.4005

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other's People Money : A Study of The Social Psychology of Embezzlement . Mountclair, New Jersey : Glenceo III, Free Pass.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Tradition London: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Damayanti, R. and A. N. S. Hapsari (2021). Three Lines Of Defense Sebagai Respon Atas Fraud Dan Upaya Pencapaian Sustainable Development Goals Desa. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi 5 (1), 102-120. https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v5i1.18844

Haryadi, B. (2018). Mengungkap Rahasia Dibalik Angka Pendapatan (Metode Studi Kritis). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan , 2(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2018.v2.i2.3937

Kasmir (2013). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kuswarno, E. (2009). Metodelogi Penelitian Komunikasi Fenomenologi: Konsepsi Pedoman dan Contoh Penelitian. Bandung: Widya Padjajaran.

Marks, J. (2012). The Mind Behind The Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral And Environmental Elements.

Martias, A. (2018). Analisa Dampak Lemahnya Pengendalian Internal Sentra Kas PT.ALKHA atas Pilot Project Pengelolaan CDM Potensi Fraud. Seminar Nasional Inovasi dan Tren (SNIT), 2108, 1-8.

Miles, M. B., et al. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tentang Metode Metode Baru. Jakarta: UI Press.

Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodolgi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Rosdakarya.

Prawira, et al. (2014). Pengaruh Moralitas Individu, Asimetri Informasi dan Efektivitas Pengendalian Internal terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan (Fraud) Akuntansi (Studi Empiris pada Badan Usaha Milik Daerah Kabupaten Buleleng). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi Undiksha, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jimat.v2i1.3434

Skousen, J. C., et al. (2009). Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of the Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99. Advances in Financial Economics, 13, 53-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005

Sugiyono (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat: eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif, dan konstruktif. Bandung : Alfabeta

Downloads

Published

2022-10-18