Netnografi: Perspektif Netizen Terhadap Kenaikan Tarif PPN 11%

Authors

  • Moh. Faisol Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Wiraraja, Madura, Jawa Timur
  • Norsain Norsain Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Wiraraja, Madura, Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v6i2.24536

Keywords:

Netnography, UU HPP, Value Added Tax

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine netizens' perceptions of the 11% increase in the VAT rate.

Methodology/Approach: The researcher uses a qualitative approach using the netnographic method because it is relevant to the discussion of netizen responses originating from social media. Research data collection used observation and documentation on the twitter account (#PPNNAIK) with the NCapture for Nvivo application, then analyzed using qualitative data analysis and NVivo R1 software.

Findings: The results of this study state that there are pros and cons related to the 11% VAT increase policy that must be understood broadly and fundamentally so that it is wiser to react to it and does not cause speculation in the community. Those who are against say that an 11% VAT increase along with an increase in the prices of other necessities amid the COVID-19 pandemic is inappropriate because it will burden the people in meeting their daily needs. Meanwhile, those who are pro argue that the goods/services that are subject to 11% VAT are not goods/services that are basic needs of the community, such as rice, sugar, and the like, which are consumed by the lower middle class. However, the increase in the imposition of taxes on goods consumed by the upper middle class, so that the 11% increase in VAT has proven to increase state revenues and return to the community.

Practical and Theoretical contribution/Originality: The implication of this research is that it is important for the public to understand each "PPN 11%" policy comprehensively so as not to cause uproar in the community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, Nurul, Mahardian Hersanti Paramita, and K Nurlinda. 2019. Tinjauan Pelaksanaan Ekstensifikasi Dan Intensifikasi Pajak Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Penerimaan Pajak. Jurnal Analisa Akuntansi dan Perpajakan 3(2). https://doi.org/10.25139/jaap.v3i2.2192

Agasie, Deyola, and Rahmi Zubaedah. 2022. Urgensi Kenaikan Tarif Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Berdasarkan Asas Kepentingan Nasional. Perspektif Hukum: 215–39. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v22i2.131

Ajzen, Icek. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50(2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Alfi, Azizah Nur. 2022. Ini Daftar Barang Dan Jasa Bebas Tarif PPN 11 Persen Berlaku Mulai 1 April 2022. Bisnis.com: 1. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20220401/9/1517627/ini-daftar-barang-dan-jasa-bebas-tarif-ppn-11-persen-berlaku-mulai-1-april-2022.

Alotaibi, Khaled Omair. 2021. The Impact Of Applying Value Added Tax (VAT) On Cooperate Sales. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government Vol 27(6). https://doi.org/10.47750/cibg.2021.27.06.002

Amaranggana. 2021. Kenaikan PPN 11%, Penerimaan Negara VS Daya Beli Masyarakat. Pajakku: 1. https://www.pajakku.com/read/61965d634c0e791c3760c06d/Kenaikan-PPN-11-Persen-Penerimaan-Negara-VS-Daya-Beli-Masyarakat.

Amrin, Amrin, Khairusoalihin Khairusoalihin, and Muthoifin Muthoifin. 2021. TAX MODERNIZATION IN INDONESIA: STUDY OF ABU YUSUF’S THINKING ON TAXATION IN THE BOOK OF AL-KHARAJ. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam 23(1): 30–42. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v23i1.16792

Bandur, Agustinus. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Metodologi, Desain, Dan Teknik Analisis Data Dengan NVIVO 11 Plus. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.

Bangsawan, Achdian Anggreny, and Rahayu Alkam. 2023. Implikasi Atas Kenaikan Tarif PPN Terhadap Orang Pribadi Dan Pengusaha Guna Optimalisasi Penerimaan Negara Pasca Pandemi. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business 6(1): 83–93. https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v6i1.3771

Cakranegara, Pandu Adi et al. 2022. The Impact Of Goods Product Pricing Strategies On Consumer Purchasing Power: A Review Of The Literature. Jurnal Ekonomi 11(03): 1115–20.

Christover, Arnold Putra. 2016. Pemahaman Ekstensifikasi Wajib Pajak Dan Intensifikasi Pajak Terhadap Persepsi Fiskus Tentang Penerimaan Pajak. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi 4(1). https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.4.1.2016.12294

Dann, Stephen. 2015. Twitter Data Acquisition and Analysis: Methodology and Best Practice. In Maximizing Commerce and Marketing Strategies through Micro-Blogging, IGI Global, 280–96. https://doi.org/ 10.4018/978-1-4666-8408-9.ch012

Darussalam, Danny Septriadi, and Khisi Armaya Dhora. 2020. Konsep Dan Aplikasi Pajak Penghasilan. Jakarta: DDTC.

DDTC. 2022. Tarif PPN 11 Persen Menjamin Keadilan Dan Stabilitas. DDTC: 1. https://news.ddtc.co.id/tarif-ppn-11-persen-menjamin-keadilan-dan-stabilitas-38192.

Djufri, Djufri. 2022. Dampak Pengenaan PPN 11% Terhadap Pelaku Dunia Usaha Sesuai UU No. 7 Tahun 2021 Tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan Di Indonesia. Journal Of Social Research 1(5): 391–404. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v1i5.106

Dukoski, Sasha, and Berat Aqifi. 2017. The Price and Determination of the Price in the Sales Agreement. Acta U. Danubius Jur.: 113.

Hai-Jew, Shalin. 2015. Tweet Portraiture: Understanding the Gist of Electronic Identities through Microblogged Messaging in Social Media Using NCapture and NVivo 10. In Enhancing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research with Technology, IGI Global, 308–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6493-7.ch013

Huda, Mokhamad Khoirul, and Agus Yudha Hernoko. 2017. Tax Amnesties in Indonesia and Other Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. Asian Social Science 13(7): 52–61. https://doi.ord/ 10.5539/ass.v13n7p52

Jannah, Niken Miftakhul, and Ni Luh Supadmi. 2021. The Effect of the Imposition of Value Added Tax and Sales Tax on GoodsLuxury for Consumer Purchasing Power. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR) 5.

Kamayanti, Ari. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi: Pengantar Religiositas Keilmuan. Jakarta: Yayasan Rumah Peneleh.

Keen, Michael, Mahmood Pradhan, Kenneth Kang, and Ruud de Mooij. 2011. Raising the Consumption Tax in Japan: Why, When, How? International Monetary Fund.

Kozinets, Robert V. 2015. Netnography: Redefined. Sage.

Kučerová, Vladimíra. 2017. VAT and Its Influence on Buying Behavior in the Czech Republic. Oeconomia Copernicana 8(3): 353–66. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i3.22

Kuswara, Sandy, and Dahlia Sari. 2022. Penghindaran Pajak Dan Efisiensi Investasi: Sertifikasi CFO Sebagai Pemoderasi. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan 12(2): 345–62. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i2.20265

Larasati, Ragilia, and Danny Wibowo. 2022. Implementasi Kenaikan Tarif PPN Pasca UU No 7 Tahun 2021 Pada Pengusaha Kena Pajak Di Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi (JIRA) 11(12).

Liyana, Nur Farida. 2021. Menelaah Rencana Kenaikan Tarif PPN Berdasarkan Bukti Empiris Serta Dampaknya Secara Makro Ekonomi. JURNAL PAJAK INDONESIA (Indonesian Tax Review) 5(2): 124–35. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v5i2.1394

Miles, MB, and MA Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: Sage Publications.

Pietersz, Jemmy J et al. 2021. Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung Perpajakan (Teori & Praktik). Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung.

Pike, Rob, Mark Lewis, and Daniel Turner. 2009. Impact of VAT Reduction on the Consumer Price Indices. Economic & Labour Market Review 3: 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/elmr.2009.139

Putri, Veni Gerhana, and Agus Subandoro. 2022. Analisis Pengaruh Kenaikan Tarif PPN 11% Terhadap Penjualan Pada PT X. Jurnal Revenue: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi 3(1): 54–58. https://doi.org/10.46306/rev.v3i1.95

Resmi, Siti. 2019. Perpajakan: Teori & Kasus. 10th ed. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Safonova, Margarita F et al. 2016. Taxes Harmonization Features in the European Union Countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6(8): 154–59.

Santoso, Yusuf Imam. 2022. Tarif PPN 11% Per April 2022, Lebih Tinggi Dari Malaysia Dan Singapura. DDTC: 1. https://news.ddtc.co.id/tarif-ppn-11-per-april-2022-lebih-tinggi-dari-malaysia-dan-singapura-37982.

Sapiei, Noor Sharoja, and Jeyapalan Kasipillai. 2013. Impacts of The Self-Assessment System for Corporate Taxpayers. American Journal of Economics 3(2): 75–81. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20130302.03

Singh, S N. 2019. Impact of Value Added Tax on Business Enterprises: A Case of Mettu Town.

Sugiyarsih, Susi, Endang Larasati, Sri Suwitri, and Ngatno Ngatno. 2021. Extensification to Increase the Number of Personal Tax Payer in Tax Office Pratama Cirebon. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences 4(4): 9736–51. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2996

Thomas, Alastair. 2022. Reassessing the Regressivity of the VAT. Fiscal Studies 43(1): 23–38.

Wahyuni, Endang Dwi, Annida Utami Putri, and Driana Leniwati. 2022. Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19: Ditinjau Dari Slippery Slope Framework. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan 12(2): 294–306. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i2.21884

Wildan, Muhammad. 2021. Ini Negara Dengan Tarif PPN/GST Tertinggi Di Tiap Kawasan. DDTC: 1. https://news.ddtc.co.id/ini-negara-dengan-tarif-ppn-gst-tertinggi-di-tiap-kawasan-30442.

Wulandari, Truly, Arum Prastiwi, and Sari Atmini. 2021. Penghindaran Pajak: Apakah Perusahaan Yang Bertanggung Jawab Secara Sosial Patuh Terhadap Pajak? Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan 12(3): 560–77. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i3.22361

Yin, Robert K, and Yin. 2015. Studi Kasus Desain & Metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31