Evaluasi Manajemen Risiko Proyek Konstruksi Terhadap Biaya Operasional Proyek Menggunakan Metode AHP

Authors

  • Salsabila Aufa Syahrani Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Vera Diyanty Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v6i2.26571

Keywords:

Analytical Hierarchy Process, Construction Projects, Risk Management Assessment, Risk Management Evaluation

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the risk management of the PT X project in order to reduce the impact of project operational cost overruns. Inherent risk during project implementation at PT X has been managed by implementing risk management referring to ISO 31000:2018. However, there are changes in risks that arise during the implementation of construction projects which cause changes in the risk profile.

Methodology/Approach: The uniqueness of this research is a case study with a mixed-method approach which is analyzed using the AHP method.

Findings: The results of this study state that there are seven project risk factors consisting of quality risk, economic and financial risk, technical risk, OSH risk, social risk, non-technical risk, and human resource risk. The seven factors are divided into 21 sub-factors of project risk at PT X.

Practical and Theoretical Contribution/Originality: This article contributes to the updating of the relevant risk assessments in the project.

Research Limitation: The limitation of this research is that the scope is only the risk management of the project implementation phase.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen, S., Luo, X., Li, X., & Fu, X. (2022). Risk Management of Road Engineering Project Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Tehnički Vjesnik, 29(2), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20210410091404

Daghouri, A., Mansouri, K., & Qbadou, M. (2018). Information system evaluation based on multi-criteria decision making: A comparison of two sectors. IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(6). www.ijacsa.thesai.org

Eskander, R. F. A. (2018). Risk assessment influencing factors for Arabian construction projects using analytic hierarchy process. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 4207–4218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.10.018

Fauzi, R. R., Johari, G. J., & Hantari, A. N. (2022). Identifikasi dan Penilaian Risiko pada Proyek Pembangunan Stasiun Garut Cibatu. Jurnal Konstruksi, 20(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.33364/konstruksi/v.20-1.1014

Firmansyah, M., Dewa, I., & Yudha, K. (2021). Esensi Perbedaan Metode Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Elastisitas-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 3(2), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.29303/e-jep.v3i2.46

Gbahabo, P. T., & Ajuwon, O. S. (2017). Effects of project cost overruns and schedule delays in Sub-Saharan Africa. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 46–59.

Goyal, P., Rahman, Z., & Kazmi, A. A. (2015). Identification and prioritization of corporate sustainability practices using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Modelling in Management, 10(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-09-2012-0030

Internasional Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018). ISO 31000: Risk Management - Guidelines.

Khairun Nisa, A. A., Subiyanto, S., & Sukamta, S. (2019). Penggunaan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Untuk Pemilihan Supplier Bahan Baku. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 9(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol9iss1pp86-93

Kotb, M. H., Aly, A. S., & Muhammad, E. K. M. A. (2019). Risk Assessment of Time and Cost Overrun Factors throughout Construction Project Lifecycle. Life Science Journal, 16(9), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.7537/marslsj160919.10

Lyu, H.-M., Sun, W.-J., Shen, S.-L., & Zhou, A.-N. (2020). Risk Assessment Using a New Consulting Process in Fuzzy AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001757

Martens, F., & Rittenberg, L. (2020). Risk Appetite-Critical to Success. In The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Messah, Y. A. , Widodo, T. , & Adoe, M. L. (2013). Kajian Penyebab Keterlambatan Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstuksi Gedung Di Kota Kupang. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, II(2).

Milyardi, R. (2020). Perbandingan Karakteristik Manajemen Risiko Konstruksi Pada Kontraktor Bumn Dan Swasta. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 16, 1–133.

Mubarika, N. R., & Handayani, S. (2019). Atribut Dewan Komisaris Dan Risiko Perusahaan (Perbankan di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v9i2.59

Pijoh, D. V. D., Pratama, B. C., Pramono, H., & Hapsari, I. (2022). Does Institutional Ownership Moderate the Relationship Between the Board of Directors and Risk Disclosure?. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 5(4), 547-564. https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v5i4.23071

Rosyid, M., Saraswati, F., & Ghofar, E. (2022). Firm Value: CSR Disclosure, Risk Management And Good Corporate Governance Dimensions. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 12(1), 186–209. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v11i3.20367

Szymański, P. (2017). Risk management in construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 208, 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.036

Wahyuni, E. D. (2022). Adakah Korelasi Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), Profitabilitas Dan Leverage Keuangan Terhadap Return Saham? Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 5(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v5i2.18885

Younas, A., Pedersen, M., & Durante, A. (2020). Characteristics of Joint Displays Illustrating Data Integration in Mixed-Methods Nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(2), 676–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14264

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31