Akuntabilitas Penetapan Sima Kerajaan Medang Masa Pemerintahan Dyah Balitung 898-910 M

Authors

  • Maharani Wuryantoro Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Eko Ganis Sukoharsono Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Aji Dedi Mulawarman Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v7i2.32695

Keywords:

Accountability, Historical Accounting, Sima

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to explore accounting and accountability in sima policies during the Medang Kingdom era.

Methodology/approach: Accounting and accountability was viewed using Foucault's Power-Knowledge perspective

Findings: Accountability during the Medang Kingdom was rooted in eight practices in the lives of leaders known as Astabrata. Sima's policy as a reflection of Astabrata is closely related to the functions of accounting, accountability and control. Evidence shows that accounting power is manifested in many ways, including determining the size of the sima, business limits, determining pasek-pasek, the rights and obligations of sima leaders regarding reporting, and recording on inscriptions and palm leaves. This paper argues that accounting plays a role in legitimizing power through knowledge that develops in society through these eight life practices

Practical and Theoretical contribution/Originality: Accountability studies taken from the royal period are relatively rare, so that research can be carried out by using a knowledge of power perspective as a tool to reveal the accountability of sima policies

Research Limitation: The limitations of the research lie in the data source, namely the research inscription may not be able to provide a complete picture of accounting and accountability practices at that time

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnstein, R. S. (1971). Eight Rungs on the Ladder of Citizen Participation. In Citizen ParticipationL Effecting Community Change. Praeger Publishers.

Assagaf, N. A. S., Eko Ganis, & Baridwan, Z. (2020). Accounting Practices in the Golden Era of Sultan Babullah: The Sultanate of Ternate (1570-1583). Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis 7(2), 151-166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v7i2.16761

Boechari. (2018). Kerajaan Mataram Sebagaimana Terbayang dari Data Prasasti In Melacak Sejarah Kuno Lewat Prasasti (3 ed., Vol. 3, pp. 183-195). Penerbit KPG.

Budiasih, I. G. A. N. (2014). Fenomena Akuntabilitas Perpajakan pada Jaman Bali Kunno: Suatu Studi Interpretif Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 5(3), 409-420.

Budiasih, I. G. A. N., Erawati, N. M. A., & Suardikha, I. M. S. (2018). Praktik Akuntansi Betawian dalam Perspektif Kuasa dan Pengetahuan. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2018.04.9001

Budiasih, I. G. A. N., & Sukoharsono, E. G. (2012). Accounting Practices and the Use of Money in the Reign of King Udayana in Bali: An Ethnoarcheological Approach. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 15(3).

Carnegie, G. D., & Napier, C. J. (2012). Accounting's past, present and future: The Unifying Power of History. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(2), 328-369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211198782

Ezzamel, M. (1997). Accounting, Control and Accountability: Preliminary Evidence from Ancient Egypt. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8(6), 563-601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1997.0123

Ezzamel, M. (2005). Accounting For the Activities of Funerary Temples: The Interwining of the Sacred and the Profane Accounting and Business Research, 35(1), 29-51. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2005.9729661

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1-11.

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Pantheon Books.

Grossi, G., Kallio, K. M., Sargiacomo, M., & Skoog, M. (2019). Accounting, Performance Management Systems and Accountability Changes in Knowledge-Intensive Public Organizations: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(1), 256-280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2019-3869

Hopwood, A. (1987). The Archeology of Accounting Systems. Accounting Organizations and Society, 12(3), 207-234.

Jayasinghe, K., & Soobaroyen, T. (2009). Religious "Spirit" and Peoples' Perceptions of Accountability in Hindu and Buddhist Religious Organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(7), 997-1028. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910987358

Kuntowijoyo. (2003). Metodologi Sejarah (2 ed., Vol. 2). PT. Tiara Wacana Yogya

Lutfillah, N. Q. (2014). Akuntansi dalam Penetapan Sima Masa Jawa Kuno. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 5(1), 262-272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2014.08.5018

Lutfillah, N. Q. (2021). Gayatri Akuntansi Majapahit. Penerbit Peneleh.

Lutfillah, N. Q., & Sukoharsono, E. G. (2008). Accounting in the Golden Age of Singosari Kingdom: A Foucauldian Perspective Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI, Pontianak, Pontianak

Lutfillah, N. Q., & Sukoharsono, E. G. (2013). Historiografi Akuntansi Indonesia Masa Mataram Kuno (Abad VII-XI Masehi). Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 4(1), 75-84.

Lutfillah, N. Q., Sukoharsono, E. G., Mulawarman, A. D., & Prihatiningtias, Y., W. (2016). Accounting and Finance Review Revealing the Accounting Existence Through Debt-Receivable Practice at Majapahit Kingdom Era (1350). Accounting and Finance Review, 1(1), 59-65.

Miller, P., & Napier, C. J. (1993). Genealogies of Calculation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(7), 631-647.

Mudhoffir, A. M. (2013). Teori Kekuasaan Michel Foucault: Tantangan bagi Sosiologi Politik. Jurnal Sosiologi, 18(1), 75-100.

Mulawarman, A. D. (2010). Integrasi Paradigma Akuntansi: Refleksi atas Pendekatan Sosiologi dalam Ilmu Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 1(1), 155-171.

Peters, B. G. (2010). The Politics of Bureaucracy and Introduction to Comparative Public Administration (Vol. 6). Routledge.

Putra, C. G. B., & Muliati, N. K. (2020). Spirit Kearifan Lokal Bali dalam Akuntabilitas Desa Adat Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(3), 561-580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2020.11.3.32

Rosyinadia, C. D., Sukoharsono, E. G., & Djamhuri, A. (2014). Accounting and Accountability Strategies of Gajah Mada’s Government: Analysis of Power-Knowledge. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(6), 19-24.

Satrio, R., Sukoharsono, E. G., & Prihatiningtias, Y., W. (2018). The Construction of Internal Control System of Sima Village in Majapahit Empire Based on Jedong Inscription IX-X. Journal of Accounting and Business Education, 2(2), 290-309.

Sharon, S. S., & Paranoan, S. (2020). Refleksi Rumah Adat Ammatoa dalam Akuntabilitas Organisasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2020.11.1.04

Soebadio, H., Sedyawati, E., Soesanti, N., & Astuti, R. (1997). Kajian Astabrata: Pendahuluan dan Teks CV. Putra Sejati Raya.

Suarbhawa, I. G. M. (2009). Mata Uang Pada Jaman Bali Kuna. In. Denpasar: Balai Arkeologi Denpasar

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Penerbit Alfabeta.

Sukoharsono, E. G. (1995). A Power and Knowledge Analysis of Indonesian Accounting History: Social, Political, adn Economic Forces Shaping the Emergence and Development of Accounting University of Wollongong].

Yayla, H. (2011). Operating Regimes of the Government: Accounting and Accountability Changes in the Sultan Suleyman Waqf of the Ottoman Empire (The 1826 Experience). Accounting History, 16(1), 5-34.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-28