Apakah Kualitas Audit Memediasi Ukuran Perusahaan dan Audit Fee terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern ?

Authors

  • Eliza Virginia Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Rosidi Rosidi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Zaki Baridwan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v7i3.33544

Keywords:

Audit Fee, Audit Quality, Company Size, Going Concern

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to determine the effect of company size and audit fees on going concern with audit quality as a mediating variable.

Methodology/approach: The data used in this study came from questionnaires distributed at KAP Big Ten. The test used in this study is PLS.

Findings: The results showed that (1) company size has a negative effect on going concern; (2) audit fee has a positive effect on going concern; (3) audit quality has a positiveffect on going concern; (4) company size has no effect on audit quality; (5) audit fee has a positive effect on audit quality; (6) company size has a negative effect on going concern opinion mediated by audit quality; (7) audit fee has a positive effect on going concern opinion mediated by audit quality.

Practical and Theoretical contribution/Originality:

This research can provide practical guidance for management in obtaining and providing additional information that needs to be disclosed when a company is at risk of facing issues regarding the continuity of its operations. For auditors, this research can offer guidance in evaluating policies or performance to maintain and improve the quality of services provided. Furthermore, this research can explain existing theories within the research phenomenon, namely decision-making theory (Simon, 1993) and DeAngelo's quality theory (1981), and provide empirical evidence regarding several factors that affect going concern.

Research Limitation:

The limitation of this research lies in the low participation rate of respondents in filling out the questionnaires sent. The level of busyness, especially among auditors, is the main obstacle that causes the low response rate to the questionnaires.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andriani, N., & Nursiam, N. (2018). Pengaruh Fee Audit, Audit Tenure, Rotasi Audit, dan Reputasi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2013-2015). Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v3i1.5559

Averio, T. (2020). The analysis of influencing factors on the going concern audit opinion – a study in manufacturing firms in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-09-2020-0078

Azzahra, Z., & Susanto, B. (2015). Ukuran Perusahaan, Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi dan Manajemen Lingkungan Terhadap Pelaksanaan Akuntansi Lingkungan. Jurnal Analisis Bisnis Ekonomi, 13(1).

Ballesta, J. P. S., & García-Meca, E. (2005). Audit qualifications and corporate governance in Spanish listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510611258

Boone, J. P., Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2010). Do the Big 4 and the Second-tier firms provide audits of similar quality? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.06.007

Buchori, A., & Budiantoro, H. (2019). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan Klien, Audit Tenure, dan Spesialisasi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Pajak, Akuntansi, Sistem Informasi, Dan Auditing (PAKSI), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33476/jpaksi.v1i1.965

Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. Accounting Review, 75(4). https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.4.453

Chrisdinawidanty, Z. N. (2016). Pengaruh Etika Auditor dan Fee Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Wilayah Bandung). E-Proceeding of Management, 3(3).

Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free : The Art of Making Quality Certain. New York : New American Library.

De Janasz, S. C. (2002). Interpersonal Skill in Organizations. Boston : McGraw-Hill.

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

Erieska, L. A. (2019). Pengaruh Size KAP dan Fee Audit terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Rotasi Audit sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia 2014-2017). Jurnal Mahasiswa Magister Akuntansi, 4(1).

Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. Accounting Review, 84(5). https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521

Geiger, M. A., & Raghunandan, K. (2002). Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.67

Haalisa, S. N., & Inayati, N. I. (2021). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Audit Tenure, Kualitas Audit, dan Audit Report Lag Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Review of Applied Accounting Research (RAAR), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.30595/raar.v1i1.11721

Harahap, R. U., & Munthe, N. H. (2021). Pengaruh Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi mengenai Lingkungan Kerja Auditor, Fee Auditor terhadap Pilihan Karir sebagai Akuntan Publik. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 3(1).

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (IAI). (2014). Standar Akuntansi Keuangan: Pelaporan Keuangan Organisasi Nirlaba (PSAK 45) (Jakarta: Salemba Empat., Ed.). Salemba Empat.

Indriani, N. (2021). Pengaruh Audit Tenure dan Fee Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Ukuran KAP Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952.

Indriyani, M., & Meini, Z. (2021). Pengaruh Ukuran KAP, Audit Fee, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Sektor Industri Barang Konsumsi Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015–2019). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.36080/jak.v10i2.1556

Jennings, D. F., & Seaman, S. L. (1990). Aggressiveness of response to new business opportunities following deregulation: An empirical study of established financial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90031-N

Jurana. (2011). Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Opini Audit Going concern Melalui Kualitas Audit. Tesis, Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya.

Kesumojati, S. C. I., Widyastuti, T., & Darmansyah. (2017). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Financial Distress, Debt Default Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.34204/jiafe.v3i1.434

Krissindiastuti, M., & Rasmini, K. N. (2018). FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana , Vol. 14(2303–1018).

Latifhah, S., Oktaroza, M. L., & Sukarmanto, E. (2019). Pengaruh Fee Audit dan Audit Tenur Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Kota Bandung). Prosiding Akuntansi.

Minerva, L., Sumeisey, V. S., Stefani, S., Wijaya, S., & Lim, C. A. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Debt Ratio, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Audit Lag terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Owner, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v4i1.180

Murtin, A., & Anam, C. (2008). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Debt Default Dan Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going Concern. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi , Vol. 9 No. 2.

Pramaswaradana, I., & Astika, I. (2017). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Audit fee, Rotasi Auditor, Spesialisasi Auditor, dan Umur Publikasi Pada Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 19(1). 168-194.

Rahmadia, W. V. (2019). Pengaruh Rasio Leverage, Rasio Arus Kas, Opini Audit, Audit Lag, Dan Financial Distress Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern.

Rizky, M. Y., & Triyanto, D. N. (2021). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Financial Distress Dan Debt Default Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern (studi Empiris Perusahaan Industri Jasa Sub Sektor …. EProceedings ….

Sari, M. M. E. (2014). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Ukuran KAP, dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Kualitas Audit pada Perusahaan Manufaktur sektor Barang Konsumsi yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2011-2013. Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri.

Simon, H. A. (1993). Decision Making: Rational, Nonrational, and Irrational. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X93029003009

Suma, N. A., & Muid, D. (2019). Pengaruh Formal Competence, Audit Fee, Audit Firm Size dan Financial Distress Terhadap Opini Going Concern. DIPONEGORO JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, 8(4).

Syarif, R. M., Saebani, A., & Julianto, W. (2021). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, dan Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 2(2).

Tandungan, D., & Mertha, I. M. (2016). Pengaruh Komite Audit, Ukuran Perusahaan, Audit Tenure, dan Reputasi KAP terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 16(1).

Tika, F. (2013). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit,Kondisi Keuangan,Opini Audit ,Dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going concern (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Tesis, Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Unversitas Brawijaya.

www.tribunnews.com. (2023). Rhenald Kasali Paparkan Modus Penipuan Adani Group Milik Orang Terkaya Nomor Tiga di Dunia. https://www.tribunnews.com/bisnis/2023/02/09/rhenald-kasali-paparkan-modus-penipuan-adani-group-milik-orang-terkaya-nomor-tiga-di-dunia?page=2.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-08