Applicability audit committee on detecting financial statement fraud using diamond theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v7i4.36599Keywords:
Audit Committee, Financial Statement Fraud, Fraud DiamondAbstract
Purpose: This study investigates the application of fraud diamond theory in the detection of financial statement fraud, utilizing financial targets, industry characteristics, auditor changes, and director changes as independent variables.
Methodology/approach: This research focusing on healthcare companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2016 until 2023, the study analyzes data from 32 firms, resulting in 185 analytical units. Employing panel data regression analysis through Eviews 12.
Findings: The findings reveal that only financial targets show a positive and significant influence on financial statement fraud. In contrast, the other variables—industry characteristics, auditor changes, and director changes—show no significant impact. Additionally, while the audit committee moderates the relationship between industry characteristics and financial statement fraud, it does not influence the relationships involving financial targets, auditor changes, or director changes.
Practical and Theoretical contribution/Originality: The novelty of this research is using the audit committee as a moderating variable to minimize the occurrence of financial statement fraud.
Research Limitation: Future research is expected to use new theories, other proxies, and use different sector samples because this research is only limited to healthcare companies.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, W. N., & Said, R. (2019). Audit and risk committee in financial crime prevention. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2017-0116
Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013
Achmad, T., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2019). Fraudulent Financial Reporting Based of Fraud Diamond Theory: A Study of the Banking Sector in Indonesia. JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi), 4(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.34204/jiafe.v4i2.1112
AICPA. (2002). Statement on Auditing Standard (SAS) No. 99. Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit.
Akbar, R. N., Zakaria, A., & Prihatni, R. (2022). Financial Statement Analysis of Fraud With Hexagon Model. Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan Dan Auditing, 3(1), 137–161.
Albrecht, C., Holland, D., Malague, R., Dolan, S., & Tzafrir, S. (2015). The Role of Power in Financial Statement Fraud Schemes. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(4), 803–813.
Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. JDA Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v9i2.4036
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2024). Occupational Fraud 2024 : A Report To The Nations. 1–106.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia. (2019). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019.
Bader, A. A., Abu Hajar, Y. A., Weshah, S. R. S., & Almasri, B. K. (2024). Predicting Risk of and Motives behind Fraud in Financial Statements of Jordanian Industrial Firms Using Hexagon Theory. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(3), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17030120
Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M., & Christina Daat, S. (2018). Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015). Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah, 13(1), 114–134.
Beasley, M. S., Hermanson, D. R., Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2010). Fraudulent Financial Reporting:1998-2007: An Analysis of U.S Public Companies. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of The Treadway Commission (COSO).
Biduri, S., & Tjahjadi, B. (2024). Determinants of financial statement fraud: the perspective of pentagon fraud theory (evidence on Islamic banking companies in Indonesia). Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2022-0213
Cressey, D. (1953). The Fraud Triangle Theory. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences.
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x
Dung, N. N. K., & Tuan, D. A. (2019). The study of audit expectation gap: The auditor’s responsibilities in a financial statement audit in Vietnam. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(11), 1227–1254. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.911.1227.1254
Fathmaningrum, E. S., & Anggarani, G. (2021). Fraud Pentagon and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 22(3), 625–646. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v22i3.12538
Fitriana, Saepudin, D., & Santoso, R. A. (2021). Fraud Diamond Theory Detect Financial Statement Fraud in Manufacturing Companies on The Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 5(2), 93–105.
Handoko, B. L., & Natasya. (2019). Fraud diamond model for fraudulent financial statement detection. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 6865–6872. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5838.098319
Hidayah, E., & Saptarini, G. D. (2020). Pentagon fraud analysis in detecting potential financial statement fraud of banking companies in Indonesia. Uii-Icabe 2019, 1(1), 89–102.
Jaunanda, M., & Silaban, D. P. (2020). Pengujian Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Resiko Financial Fraudulent Reporting. Ultima Management : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 12(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.31937/manajemen.v12i2.1581
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader, Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410.023
Kaituko, L. E., Githaiga, P. N., & Chelogoi, S. K. (2023). Board structure and the likelihood of financial statement fraud. Does audit fee matter? Evidence from manufacturing firms in the East Africa community. Cogent Business and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2218175
Kayoi, S. A. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement Fraud Ditinjau Dari Fraud Triangle Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015-2017. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 8(4), 1–13.
Khamainy, A. H., Ali, M., & Setiawan, M. A. (2022). Detecting financial statement fraud through new fraud diamond model: the case of Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 925–941. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2021-0118
Lastanti, H. S. (2020). Role of Audit Committee in the Fraud Pentagon and Financial Statement Fraud. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 2(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.25105/ijca.v2i1.7163
Muara Rizqulloh Noble. (2019). Fraud Diamond Analysis in Detecting FInancial Stetment Fraud. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 9(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v9i2.1632
Naldo, R. R., & Widuri, R. (2023). Fraudulent Financial Reporting and Fraud Hexagon: Evidence from Infrastructure Companies in ASEAN. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 68(3), 1455–1468. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.3.2023.14
Octaviana, N. (2022). Analisis Elemen-Elemen Fraud Hexagon Theory Sebagai Determinan Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v11i2.895
Omukaga, K. O. (2020). Is The Fraud Diamond Perspective Valid In Kenya? Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 810–840. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2019-0141
PWC. (2022). Protecting the perimeter: The rise of external fraud.
Santoso, N. T., & Surenggono. (2018). Predicting Financial Statement Fraud with Fraud Diamond Model of Manufacturing Companies Listed in Indonesia. State-of-the-Art Theories and Empirical Evidence, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6926-0_9
Sari, M. P., Mahardika, E., Suryandari, D., & Raharja, S. (2022). The audit committee as moderating the effect of hexagon’s fraud on fraudulent financial statements in mining companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2150118
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2008). Detecting And Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness Of The Fraud Traingle And Sas No. 99. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494Electroniccopyavailableat:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494
Tiffani, L. dan M. (2015). Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Analisis Fraud Triangel pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(2), 112–125.
Wijerathna, A. G. H. S. K., & Perera, H. A. P. L. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review on Forensic Accounting. The Conference Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Business & Information ICBI, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka., 105–119. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3844260
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004a). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud.
Yusrianti, H., Ghozali, I., Yuyetta, E., Aryanto, & Meirawati, E. (2020). Financial statement fraud risk factors of fraud triangle: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(4), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n4p36
Zainudin, E. F., & Hashim, H. A. (2016). Detecting fraudulent financial reporting using financial ratio. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 14(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-05-2015-0053
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zea Riza Sinensis, Fuad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi dilisensikan di bawah lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Penulis yang menerbitkan artikel di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Penulis mempertahankan hak cipta dan memberikan hak jurnal atas publikasi pertama dengan karya yang secara serentak dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi Pengaitan Creative Commons yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya dengan pengakuan atas karya penulis dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini.
- Penulis dapat masuk ke dalam pengaturan kontrak tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif versi karya jurnal yang diterbitkan (misalnya, mempostingnya ke repositori institusional atau mempublikasikannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan publikasi awalnya di jurnal ini.
- Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk memposting pekerjaan mereka secara online (misalnya, di repositori institusional atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses pengajuan, karena dapat mengarah pada pertukaran produktif, serta kutipan pekerjaan sebelumnya dan yang lebih besar (Lihat Pengaruh Akses Terbuka).
