Mapping of Leading Sectors to Optimize Regional Economic Growth in West Sumatra Province

Authors

  • Yuria Sari IPB University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jie.v8i04.35031

Keywords:

Economic Growth, Leading Sectors, Location Quotient, West Sumatra

Abstract

West Sumatra's economic growth over the previous decade showed a downward trend from year to year. Therefore, it is necessary to accelerate economic growth by determining development priorities based on the leading sectors in each city district. This research uses Location Quotient (LQ), Differential Shift (DS), Dynamic LQ, and Klassen Typology analysis by processing West Sumatra GRDP data from 2019 to 2023. The results showed three advanced and fast-growing sectors: agriculture, fisheries and forestry, trade and education services. It is called a leading sector if it has a concentration of activity (comparative advantage), is highly competitive (competitive advantage), and is prospective for development. The agriculture, fisheries, and forestry sectors can be developed in Mentawai Islands, Tanah Datar, Padang Pariaman, and Pasaman. The trade sector is prioritized for development in South Solok and Padang City, as well as education services in Sijunjung, Padang Pariaman, Agam, Solok City, and Payakumbuh City. In addition to these three sectors, other sectors can be developed in their respective priority areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahyuni, S., dan Latipah, S. L. (2023). Strategi Pengembangan Ekonomi Regional Dengan Pendekatan Sectoral Economic Analysis Di Provinsi Kepulauan Riau. Economic Military and Geographically Business Review, 1(1).

Anis, A. (1999). Analisis Potensi Sumber Daya Daerah dan Perananya Dalam Meningkatkan Kemandirian Pembangunan Daerah (Kasus Kodya Sawahlunto Propinsi Sumatera Barat). Laporan Penelitian. Universitas Negeri Padang

Arman, A. (2016). Analisis Sektor Strategis Pulau Sulawesi, Jawa Timur dan Kalimantan Timur. Sosiohumaniora, 18(2), 91-99.

Armelly, A., Rusdi, M., dan Pasaribu, E. (2021). Analisis Sektor Unggulan Perekonomian Indonesia: Model Input-Output. Sorot, 16(2), 119-134.

Arsyad, L. (1999). Pengantar Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). PDRB Provinsi-Provinsi Menurut Lapangan Usaha tahun 2019 – 2023 Volume 17. https://webapi.bps.go.id/

Boari, Y., Hosio, Y. F., Paula, D. Y., dan Biweng, M. P. (2023). Analisis Penentuan Sektor Unggulan Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Perekonomian Daerah Di Kota Jayapura. MARAS: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 1(3), 425-436.

BPS Sumatera Barat. (2024). PDRB Kabupaten/Kota Menurut Lapangan Usaha Atas dasar Harga Konstan 2010 di Provinsi Sumatera Barat. https://sumbar.bps.go.id/

Harini, R., Giyarsih, S. R., dan Budiani, S. R. (2005). Analisis Sektor Unggulan dalam Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Majalah Geografi Indonesia, 19(1), 1-20.

Indriani, L., dan Mukhyi, M. A. (2013). Sektor Unggulan Perekonomian Indonesia: Pendekatan Input-Output. Prosiding PESAT, 5.

Muta’ali, L. (2015). Teknik Analisis Regional Untuk Perencanaan Wilayah, Tata Ruang Dan Lingkungan. Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Geografi (BPFG).

Putri, M. A. G., dan Huda, S. (2023). Analisis Sektor Basis dan Non Basis terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Wilayah Malang Raya dengan Metode Location Quotient, Dynamic LQ, Shift Share, dan Tipologi Klassen. JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi), 9(5), 2086-2100.

Rustiadi, R., Saefulhakim, S., dan Panuju, Dyah R. (2009). Perencanaan dan pengembangan wilayah. Jakarta: Crespent Press dan Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Suryani, T. (2013). Analisis Peran Sektor Ekonomi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kabupaten Pemalang (Analisis Tabel Input Output Kabupaten Pemalang Tahun 2010). Economics Development Analysis Journal, 2(1).

Tarigan, R. (2005). Perencanaan Pembangunan Regional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-27

How to Cite

Sari, Y. (2024). Mapping of Leading Sectors to Optimize Regional Economic Growth in West Sumatra Province. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi JIE, 8(04), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.22219/jie.v8i04.35031