Do Government Characteristics Affect E-Government Maturity?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i1.20543Keywords:
E-Government Maturity, Government Complexity, Human Resource Competence, Width of AreaAbstract
The purpose of this research is to examine empirical evidence of the effect of human resource competence, information quality, government complexity, area, and size of government on the maturity of e-government of provincial government in Indonesia. The research applied purposive sampling method, and examined 21 provinces in Indonesia for the year of 2018-2020. This study uses secondary data from Central Bureau of Statistics, websites of provincial government, and data from Ministry of State Apparatus Empowerment and Reformation of Bureaucracy (KemenPAN RB). Since this research involved multiyear data, therefore data panel analysis using Common Effect Method was applied. The results show that human resource competence and government complexity significantly influence the maturity of e-government. However, information quality, width of area and size of government do not influence maturity of e-government. The results are important for the government in developing e-government systems. Implications of the research are further discussed in the paper.
Downloads
References
Adam, I. O. (2020). Examining E-Government development effects on corruption in Africa: The mediating effects of ICT development and institutional quality. Technology in Society, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101245
Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X05000973
Das, A., Singh, H., & Joseph, D. (2017). A longitudinal study of e-government maturity. Information and Management, 54(4), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.09.006
Dhevina, I. (2018, April 4). E- Government : Inovasi dalam Strategi Komunikasi. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/e_government_inovasi_dalam_strategi_komunikasi
Epstein, B., & Finkelstein Shapiro, A. (2019). Financial development, unemployment volatility, and sectoral dynamics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 99, 82–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2018.11.004
Farida, I., Setiawan, R., Maryatmi, A. S., & Juwita, N. (2020). The Implementation of E-Government in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 in Indonesia. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT, 22(2), 340–346. http://ijpsat.ijsht-journals.org
Iannacci, F., Seepma, A. P., de Blok, C., & Resca, A. (2019). Reappraising maturity models in e-Government research: The trajectory-turning point theory. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(3), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.02.001
Janita, M. S., & Miranda, F. J. (2018). Quality in e-Government services: A proposal of dimensions from the perspective of public sector employees. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.004
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X7690026X
Kaisara, G., & Pather, S. (2011). The e-Government evaluation challenge: A South African Batho Pele-aligned service quality approach. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.008
KemenPANRB. (2018). Hasil Evaluasi SPBE Tahun 2018.
KemenPANRB. (2019). Laporan Hasil Monitoring dan Evaluasi SPBE Tahun 2019.
KemenPANRB. (2020). Laporan Hasil Monitoring dan Evaluasi SPBE Tahun 2020.
Khalid, S. A., & Lavilles, R. Q. (2019). Maturity assessment of local E-government websites in the Philippines. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.104
Krishnan, S., Teo, T. S. H., & Lim, V. K. G. (2013). Examining the relationships among e-government maturity, corruption, economic prosperity and environmental degradation: A cross-country analysis. Information and Management, 50(8), 638–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.003
Krishnan, S., Teo, T. S. H., & Lymm, J. (2017). Determinants of electronic participation and electronic government maturity: Insights from cross-country data. International Journal of Information Management, 37(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.03.002
Kumajas, Y. N. (2021). The Effects of Human Resources Quality, Infrastructure, Leadership, and Communication on E-Government Implementation: A Case of Indonesia Local Government. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 597–612. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i1.1643
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X01000661
Lee, J., Hwang, J., & Kim, H. (2022). Different government support effects on emerging and mature ICT sectors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121253
Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102
Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e‐government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0033-3352.00196
Nurkholis, N., & Anggraini, R. Y. (2020). Determinants of E-Government Implementation Based on Technology Acceptance Model. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jdm/article/view/23853
Oktaviani, S., & Arza, F. I. (2020). Pengaruh Kompetisi Politik, Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Dana Alokasi Umum, dan Opini Audit Terhadap Implementasi E-Government. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi (JEA). http://jea.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/jea/article/view/284
Pradipta, R., & Sofyani, H. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Tingkat Pelaksanaan E-Government Di Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Kontemporer, 4(2), 185–204. http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/JAKK/article/view/7756
Sangki, J. (2018). Vision of future e-government via new e-government maturity model: Based on Korea’s e-government practices. Telecommunications Policy, 42(10), 860–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.12.002
Silaghi, F., & Sarkar, S. (2021). Agency problems in public-private partnerships investment projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 290(3), 1174–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.050
Yustikasari, Y. (2018). Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Tingkat Pengungkapan Sukarela Informasi Keuangan Pada Website Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Profita, 11(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/profita.2018.v11.01.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Arief Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
