Can Religious and Machiavellian Influence Tax Evasion? Research Based on Gender and Age Perspective

Alfriadi Dwi Atmoko

doi:10.22219/jrak.v12i1.20803

Authors

Alfriadi Dwi Atmoko Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i1.20803

Keywords:

Age, Extrinsic Religiosity, Gender, Intrinsic Religiosity, Machiavellian, Tax Evasion

Abstract

This study aims to empirically examine the effect of religiosity and Machiavellian on tax evasion and to examine the differences in each variable based on gender and age perspectives. The population and sample in this study are taxpayers in the Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) who have reported their tax obligations with a total sample of 140 respondents. This research method is quantitative with multiple regression analysis to test the effect of independent variables on the dependent variable and independent sample t-test to test differences in perspectives based on gender and age. The sampling technique uses simple random sampling technique. Questionnaires were distributed using personally administered questionnaires and electronically using a google form. The results of this study indicate that intrinsic religiosity has no effect on tax evasion, extrinsic religiosity has a positive effect on tax evasion and maciavellian has a positive effect on tax evasion. There are differences in the level of intrinsic religiosity, extrinsic religiosity, machiavellian and tax evasion based on gender. There is no difference in the level of intrinsic religiosity, extrinsic religiosity and machiavellian based on the age perspective, but there are differences in the level of tax evasion based on the age perspective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations (Revised Ja).

Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6051769

Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2004). Estimating the Determinant of Tax Morale. National Tax Association - Tax Institute of America. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (pp. 269–274).

Asih, N. P. S. M., & Dwiyanti, K. T. (2019). Pengaruh Love Of Money , Machiavellian , dan Equity Sensitivity Terhadap Persepsi Etika Penggelapan Pajak ( Tax Evasion ). E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 26(2), 1412–1435.

Atmoko, A. D. (2018). Efek Interaksi Religiusitas Intrinsik dan Gender pada Hubungan Money Ethics dengan Tax Evasion. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(3), 391–404.

Atmoko, A. D. (2021). Does Intrinsic Religiosity Moderate Between the Self-Assessment System and Tax Evasion? a Research-Based on Gender. Assets: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pendidikan, 10(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.25273/jap.v10i2.5105

Aziz, T. I., & Taman, A. (2015). Pengaruh Love of Money dan Machaivellian terhadap Persepsi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Nominal, 4(2), 31–44.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2019). Rasio Penerimaan Pajak Terhadap PDB (Persen). Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/indikator/indikator/view_data/0000/data/1529/sdgs_17/1

Basri, Y. M. (2014). Efek moderasi religuisitas dan gender terhadap hubungan etika uang. Sna 17, 1–23.

Basri, Y. M. (2015). Pengaruh Gender , Religiusitas Dan Sikap Love Of Money Pada Persepsi Etika Penggelapan Pajak. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 10(1), 45–54.

Budiarto, D. S., Yennisa, & Nurmalisa, F. (2017). Hubungan Antara Religiusitas dan Machiavellian dengan Tax Evasion: Riset Berdasarkan Perspektif Gender. Telaah Bisnis, 18(1), 19–32.

Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

Dewanta, M. A., & Machmuddah, Z. (2019). Gender , Religiosity , Love of Money , and Ethical Perception of Tax Evasion. Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 6(1), 71–84.

Dharma, L., Agusti, R., & Kurnia, P. (2016). Pengaruh Gender, Pemahaman Perpajakan dan Religiusitas terhadap Persepsi Penggelapan Pajak. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau, 3(1), 1565–1578.

finance.detik.com. (2020). Sri Mulyani Ungkap Penerimaan Negara Turun, Ini Datanya. Finance.Detik.Con. Retrieved from https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-4944102/sri-mulyani-ungkap-penerimaan-negara-turun-ini-datanya

Fiorio, C., & Zanardi, A. (2007). It’s a Lot But Let It Stay" How Tax Evasion is Perceived Across Italy. Research Paper in Economics, Business and Statistics.

Ghozali, I. (2006). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS (4th ed.). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 19 (5th ed.). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Glock, & Stark. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Harimurti, F., & Dewi. (2019). Persepsi Etis Dan Tax Evasion Berdasarkan Karekteristik Demografi: Studi Empiris Di Solo. Seminar Nasional Dan The 6th Call for Syariah Paper, 953–964.

Harms, E. (1944). The Development of Religious Experience in Children. American Journal of Sociology, 50(2), 112–122.

Jackson, B. R., & Milliron, V. C. (1986). Tax Compliance Research: Findings, Problems, and Prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5, 125–165.

Kholberg, L. (1963). Kohlberg’s Study Helped Researcher’s Understand How and Why Childern Behave and Act in Certain Ways When Dealt With Social Dilemmas. The Development of Childern’s Orientation Toward a Moral: I Sequence in the Development of Moral Thought. Vita Humana, 6, 11–33.

Kurnianingsih, W., & Atmoko, A. D. (2022). Does Religiosity Reduce Tax Evasion? Empirical Research Based on Gender and Education, 13(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v13n2.p214-226

Li-Pang Tang, T., Chen, Y. J., & Sutarso, T. (2008). Bad Apples in Bad (Business) Barrels: The Love of Money, Machiavellianism, Risk Tolerance, and Unethical Behavior. Managemen Decision, 46(2), 243–263.

Longenecker, J. G., McKinney, J. A., & Moore, S. W. (2004). Religious Intensity, Evangelical Christianity, and Business Ethics: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4), 371–384.

Mardiasmo. (2011). Perpajakan Edisi Revisi 2011. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Mauboy, B. E., & Pesudo, D. A. A. (2019). Sifat Machiavillan , Komitmen Profesional Mahasiswa Terhadap Intensi Kecurangan Dengan Jenis Kelamin Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Accounting and Financial Review, 2(2), 119–125.

McDaniel, S. W., & Burnett, J. J. (1990). Consumer Religiousity and Retail Store Evaluative Criteria. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

McGee, R. W., & Tyler, M. (2007). Tax Evasion and Ethics: A Demographic Study of 33 Countries. In International Academy of Business and Public Administration Discipliner (IABPAD) Winter Conference, Orlando, Florida (pp. 4–7).

Musbah, A., Cowton, C. J., & Tyfa, D. (2016). The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Libyan Management Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 335–358.

nasional.kontan.co.id. (2020). Ekstensifikasi penerimaan pajak dinilai bakal sulit terealisasi. Nasional.Kontan.Co.Id. Retrieved from https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/ekstensifikasi-penerimaan-pajak-dinilai-bakal-sulit-terealisasi

Pratama, P. A. S., Musmini, L. S., & Wahyuni, M. A. (2020). Pengaruh Money Ethics, Etika Wajib Pajak, Religiusitas Intrinsik Dan Ekstrinsik Dan Tax Morale Terhadap Persepsi Wajib Pajak Mengenai Tax Evasion (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Kota Singaraja). JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi), 11(1), 44–55.

Putra, I. N. K. A. M., Anggraini, N. P. N., Rustiarini, & Sudiartana, I. M. (2017). Tax Evasion Dalam Persepsi Etis Dan Demografi Wajib Pajak. In Proceeding TEAM (Vol. 2, pp. 176–183). https://doi.org/10.23887/team.Vol2.2017.169

Ramadhani, T. S. (2015). Pengaruh Sifat Machiavellian, Locus Of Control, Dan Equity Sensitivity Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak Dengan Keputusan Etis Sebagai Variabel Intervening. JOM. Fekon, 2.

Rindayanti, & Budiarto, D. S. (2017). Hubungan antara Love of Money, Machiavellian dengan Persepsi Etis: Analisis Berdasarkan Perspektif Gender. Akuntabilitas Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 10(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v10i2.6137

Santrock, J. W. (2004). Child Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sekaran, U. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Bisnis, (4th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. J. (2016). Research Method for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley & Son.

Stark, R. (2002). Physiology and Faith: Addressing the “Universal” Gender Difference in Religious Commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(3), 495–507.

Sutiono, M. A., & Mangoting, Y. (2014). Pengaruh Pandangan Sosial , Usia , dan Kepercayaan Kepada Pemerintah Terhadap Praktik Penggelapan Pajak di Surabaya. Tax & Accounting Review, 4(1).

Tang, T. L. P., & Tang, T. L. N. (2010). Finding the Lost Sheep: A Panel Study of Business Students’ Intrinsic Religiosity, Machiavellianism, and Unethical Behavior Intentions. Ethics and Behavior, 20(5), 352–379.

Tittle, C. (1980). Sanction and social deviance: The question of deterrence. Instittute for Emirical Research in Economics.

Toriq, I. A. (2015). Pengaruh Love of Money Dan Machiavellian Terhadap Peesepsi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi (Studi Empiris Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi UNY Angkatan 2013-2014). Skripsi. UNY.

Walker, A. G., Smither, J. W., & DeBode, J. (2012). The Effects Of Religiosity On Ethical Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 437–452.

Wati, M., & Sudibyo, B. (2016). Pengaruh Pendidikan Etika Bisnis dan Religiusitas terhadap Persepsi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Economia, 12(2), 183–201.

Yelshinta, R., & Fuad, F. (2013). 2013. Love of Money, Ethical Reasoning, Machiavellian, Questionable Actions: The Impact on Accounting Students’ Ethical Decision Making by Gender Moderation. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2(3), 731–723.

Yuliana, & Cahyonowati, N. (2012). Analisis Pengaruh Persepsi Pentingnya Etika Dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial , Sifat Berpartisipasi Dalam Penghindaran Pajak ( Studi Empiris pada Konsultan Pajak di Semarang ). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 1(1), 1–13.