Does Social Management Process Matter?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v14i1.29628Keywords:
Board Composition, Firm Performance, Indonesian Stock Exchange, Social EnvironmentAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this research is to find out whether social environment is a mediating variable in the influence of the main director's structure on management performance.
Methodology/approach: The method used in this research is a qualitative research method sourced from secondary data collected by researchers through OSIRIS data from 709 companies whose shares are publicly traded on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.
Findings: The findings show that the influence of the composition of the board of directors on company performance varies greatly among social environments.
Practical Implications: This research adds to research references on the influence of governance on performance which is moderated by the company's social environment.
Originality/value: the novelty in this research is adding a new variable, namely the social environment as a mediating variable.
Downloads
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Alipour, M., Ghanbari, M., Jamshidinavid, B., & Taherabadi, A. (2019). Does board independence moderate the relationship between environmental disclosure quality and performance? Evidence from static and dynamic panel data. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(3), 580-610. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-06-2018-0196
Andoh, J. A. N., Abugri, B. A., & Anarfo, E. B. (2022). Board Characteristics and performance of listed firms in Ghana. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(1), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-08-2020-0344
Bakar, I. S. A., Khan, A., Mather, P., & Tanewski, G. (2018). Corporate boards and performance pricing in private debt contracts. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 50, 144-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.02.007
Biswas, P. K., Mansi, M., & Pandey, R. (2018). Board composition, sustainability committee and corporate social and environmental performance in Australia. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(4), 517-540. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-12-2017-0107
Chamberlain, T. W. (2010). Board Composition and Firm Performance: Some Canadian Evidence. International Advances in Economic Research, 16(4), 421-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-010-9271-2
Chen, T. (2015). Institutions, board structure, and corporate performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.009
Doan, T., & Nguyen, N. Q. (2018). Boards of directors and firm leverage: Evidence from real estate investment trusts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 51, 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.05.007
Dobija, D., & Kravchenko, G. (2017). Supervisory Board Composition and Firm Financial Performance: A Case of Companies Listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 25(4), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.208
Fernández-Temprano, M. A., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2020). Types of director, board diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(2), 324-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-03-2019-0096
García Martín, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2018). Boards of directors: composition and effects on the performance of the firm. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 1015-1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2018.1436454
Goel, A., Dhiman, R., Rana, S., & Srivastava, V. (2022). Board composition and firm performance: empirical evidence from Indian companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(4), 771-789. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-09-2021-0483
Green, C. P., & Homroy, S. (2018). Female directors, board committees and firm performance. European Economic Review, 102, 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.12.003
Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Ratri, M. C., & Nowland, J. (2019). CEO busyness and firm performance: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 5(5), e01601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01601
Herbert, W. E., & Agwor, T. C. (2021). Board Composition and Corporate Performance: X-raying the Nexus in Nigerian Banks. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211049593
Hsu, H.-H., & Wu, C. Y.-H. (2014). Board composition, grey directors and corporate failure in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 46(3), 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.12.002
James, H. L., Borah, N., & Lirely, R. (2022). The effectiveness of board independence in high-discretion firms. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 85, 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.10.021
Jubilee, R. V. W., Khong, R. W. L., & Hung, W. T. (2018). Would diversified corporate boards add value? The case of banking institutions in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 10(2/3), 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-05-2018-0089
Khan, M. K., Zahid, R. M. A., Saleem, A., & Sági, J. (2021). Board Composition and Social & Environmental Accountability: A Dynamic Model Analysis of Chinese Firms. Sustainability, 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910662
Oldford, E., Ullah, S., & Hossain, A. T. (2020). A social capital view of women on boards and their impact on firm performance. Managerial Finance, 47(4), 570-592. https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-02-2020-0091
Prashar, A., & Gupta, P. (2020). Corporate boards and firm performance: a meta-analytic approach to examine the impact of contextual factors. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(7), 1454-1478. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-10-2019-0860
Puni, A., & Anlesinya, A. (2020). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance in a developing country. International Journal of Law and Management, 62(2), 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-03-2019-0076
Rashid, M. M. (2020). “Ownership structure and firm performance: the mediating role of board characteristics”. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(4), 719-737. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-02-2019-0056
Rodriguez-Rodriguez, J., Fernandez-Alonso, S., & Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2014). Board characteristics and firm performance in Spain. Corporate Governance, 14(4), 485-503. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-01-2013-0013
Samara, I., & Yousef, I. (2022). The impact of foreign directors and firm performance on strategic change. Review of International Business and Strategy, 33(3), 466-492. https://doi.org/10.1108/ribs-10-2021-0137
Shehata, N., Salhin, A., & El-Helaly, M. (2017). Board diversity and firm performance: evidence from the U.K. SMEs. Applied Economics, 49(48), 4817-4832. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1293796
Unite, A. A., Sullivan, M. J., & Shi, A. A. (2019). Board Diversity and Performance of Philippine Firms: Do Women Matter? International Advances in Economic Research, 25(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-018-09718-z
van Essen, M., van Oosterhout, J. H., & Carney, M. (2011). Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 873-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9269-1
Waheed, A., & Malik, Q. A. (2019). Board characteristics, ownership concentration and firms’ performance. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 8(2), 146-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/sajbs-03-2018-0031
Zhuang, Y., Chang, X., & Lee, Y. (2018). Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance: Evidence from Chinese Public Firms. Sustainability, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082752
Zubeltzu‐Jaka, E., Álvarez‐Etxeberria, I., & Ortas, E. (2020). The effect of the size of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A meta‐analytic approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1361-1374. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1889
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elok Fitriya, Bambang Tjahjadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
