Frequency of Audit Committee Meetings and Firm Value: Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure (ESG) Roles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v15i2.30189Keywords:
Environmental Social and Governance (ESG), Frequency of Audit Committee Meetings, Firm valueAbstract
Purpose: This research aims to determine the mediating role of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures on the frequency of audit committee meetings and the value of energy companies in Indonesia from a scientific perspective.
Methodology/approach: The data analysis method employed to test the hypotheses is structural equation modeling with partial least squares (SEM-PLS). The research sample comprises 80 companies in the energy sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2020–2022.
Findings: This study successfully demonstrated that ESG disclosure acts as a mediator between the frequency of audit committee meetings and a company's value. Furthermore, the direct influence of audit committee meeting frequency and ESG disclosure significantly affects the company's value.
Practical implications: The implications of this research can be that increasing the role of audit committees in overseeing and monitoring ESG issues is expected to have a positive impact on effective and strong ESG disclosures when the ideal frequency of audit committee meetings can be maintained.
Originality/value: This research is providing evidence that the disclosure of ESG is one of the contributing factors in driving the increase in the value of companies in the energy sector in Indonesia, particularly with the presence of an adequate frequency of audit committee meetings.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, S. (2012). Pengaruh karakteristik komite audit terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan kualitas laba sebagai pemoderasi pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Skripsi Mahasiswa Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Afza, T., & Nazir, M. S. (2014). Audit quality and firm value: A case of Pakistan. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7, 1803– 1810.
Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., McNamara, R., & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting & finance, 52(4), 971-1000.
Al-Mamun, A., Yasser, Q. R., Rahman, M. A., Wickramasinghe, A., & Nathan, T. M. (2014). Relationship between audit committee characteristics, external auditors and economic value added (EVA) of public listed firms in Malaysia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(1CONT9), 899–910.
Al-matari, Y., Al-Swidi, A. K., Fadzil, & Hanim, F. (2012). Board of Directors, Audit Committee Characteristics and Performance of Saudi Arabia Listed Companies. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2(4), 241–251.
Alodat, A. Y., Al Amosh, H., Khatib, S. F. A., & Mansour, M. (2023). Audit committee chair effectiveness and firm performance: The mediating role of sustainability disclosure. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1).
Appuhami, R., & Tashakor, S. (2017). The impact of audit committee characteristics on CSR disclosure: An analysis of Australian firms. Australian Accounting Review, 27(4), 400-420.
Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M., & Joyo, A. S. (2021). The impact of audit committee attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 497-514.
Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., Qasem, A., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Thomran, M., Al-Duais, S. D., Shukeri, S. N., & Khojally, H. M. A. (2022). Corporate governance mechanisms and ESG Reporting: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market. Sustainability, 14(10), 1–20.
Bhuiyan, M. B. U., & D’Costa, M. (2020). Audit committee ownership and audit report lag: evidence from Australia. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(1), 96-125.
Buallay, A., & Al-Ajmi, J. (2020). The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 249–264.
Campbell, M. A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 567-590.
Caporale, Maria., G., Gil-Alana., L., Plastun., A., Makarenko., I. (2022). Persistence in ESG and Conventional Stock Market Indices. Journal of Economics and Finance 46: 678–703.
Carcello, J. V., dan T. L. Neal. (2002). Disclosure in audit committee characteristics report. Accounting Horizon 16 (4): 291-304.
Cecilia, L. J., & Sjarief, J. (2021). Analisis pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, jumlah rapat komite audit, profitabilitas, dan kualitas audit terhadap nilai perusahaan (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. BALANCE: Jurnal Akuntansi, Auditing dan Keuangan, 18(2), 179-199.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Edirisinghe, I. C. J., & Abeygunasekera, A. W. J. C. (2022). Impact of audit committee attributes on ESG disclosures: evidence from firms listed in The Colombo Stock Exchange.
Fariha, R., Hossain, M. M., & Ghosh, R. (2022). Board characteristics, audit committee attributes and firm performance: empirical evidence from emerging economy. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(1), 84–96.
Fuadah, L. L., Mukhtaruddin, M., Andriana, I., & Arisman, A. (2022). The ownership structure, and the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) Disclosure, firm value and firm performance: the audit committee as moderating variable. Economies, 10 (12).
Galal, H. M., Soliman, M. M., & Bekheit, M. B. (2022). The Relation between Audit Committee Characteristics and Earnings Management: Evidence from Firms Listed on the Egyptian Stock Market. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12(09), 1439–1467.
Gantyowati, Evi. & Nugraheni, Rosa Lenna. 2014. The impact of financial distress status and corporate governance structures on the level of voluntary disclosure within annual reports of firms. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 10 (4), 389-403.
Garas, S., & ElMassah, S. (2018). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: The case of GCC countries. Critical perspectives on international business, 14(1), 2-26.
Geovanno, R., Djajadikerta, H., Setiawan, A., & Wirawan, S. (2023). Pengaruh leverage, kualitas audit, dan frekuensi rapat komite audit terhadap nilai perusahaan pada Sektor Restaurant, Hotel, dan Tourism. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 21412-21420.
Ghozali, I. (2006). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial least squares konsep, teknik dan aplikasi menggunakan program smartpls 3.0 untuk penelitian empiris. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Gupita, D. (2020). Pengaruh proporsi dewan komisaris, frekuensi rapat dewan komisaris, ukuran komite audit, dan frekuensi rapat komite audit terhadap nilai perusahaan (Studi empiris perusahaan tambang. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Bakrie).
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Investor.id. Indonesia Tertinggal di Bidang ESG. https://investor.id/market-and-corporate/242891/indonesia-tertinggal-di-bidang-esg
KataData (2021). Isu ESG yang Menarik Minat Investor, Perubahan Iklim Teratas https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/11/08/isu-esg-yang-menarik-minat-investor-perubahan-iklim-teratas. Upload 18 Oktober 2023
Jamali, D., Karam, C., Yin, J., Soundararajan, V., 2017. CSR logics in developing countries: translation, adaptation and stalled development. J. World Bus. 52 (3), 343–359.
Jeanice, J., & Kim, S. S. (2023). Pengaruh penerapan ESG terhadap nilai perusahaan di Indonesia. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(April), 1646–1653. http://owner.polgan.ac.id/index.php/owner/article/view/1338
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader, Third Edition, 283–303.
Karamanou, I., & Vafeas, N. (2005). The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting research, 43(3), 453-486.
Kumar, P.C., 2020. ESG compliant companies provide superior returns. https://www.th estar.com.my/business/business-news/2020/02/29/esg-compliant-companies-provi de-superior-returns. (Accessed 13 March 2020).
Lendengtariang, Y., & Bimo, I. D. (2022). Peran komite audit pada sustainability disclosur. Journal of Business and Banking, 12(1), 97-108.
Lisic, L. L., Neal, T. L., Zhang, I. X., & Zhang, Y. (2016). CEO power, internal control quality, and audit committee effectiveness in substance versus in form. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(3), 1199-1237.
Qeshta, D. M. H. (2021). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from the Insurance Sector in Bahrain. Revista Gestão Inovação e Tecnologias, 11(2), 1666–1680.
Qeshtaa, M., & Ali, B. J. (2020). The moderating effect of the effectiveness of the audit committee between ownership concentration and intellectual capital disclosures among companies in gulf co-operation council. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 5979-5986.
Cebula, R., Rossi, F., & Clark, J. (2016). The impact of higher quality government regulation of business and greater economic freedom on living standards: Evidence from OECD nations. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 5(1), 82-94.
Ruan, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–16.
Sadiq, M., Singh, J., Raza, M., & Mohamad, S. (2020). The impact of environmental, social and governance index on firm value: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(5), 555–562.
Samaha, K., Khlif, H., & Hussainey, K. (2015). The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24, 13-28.
Saygili, E., Arslan, S., & Birkan, A. O. (2022). ESG practices and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 525–533.
Septiani, E., Holiawati, H., & Ruhiyat, E. (2019). Environmental performance, intellectual capital, praktik penghindaran pajak dan nilai perusahaan. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 21(1), 61–70.
Sharma, V., Naiker, V., & Lee, B. (2009). Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons, 23(3), 245–263.
Shatnawi, S. A., Eldaia, M., Marei, A., & Aaraj, S. AL. (2021). The Relationship between Audit Committee Characteristics on Accounting-based Performance (ROA and ROE) as a Measure of Performance Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Business and Digital Economy, 2(2), 15–27.
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of management journal, 40(3), 658-672.
Wiseman, R. M., Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Towards a social theory of agency. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 202–222.
Zábojníková, G., Miguel Araújo Cardoso Valente Co-Supervisor, R., & Manuel dos Santos Martins, J. (2016). The Audit Committee Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from the UK Dissertation Master in Finance. 1–52.
Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, M., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Kang, J. (2018). ESG and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8), 1–18.
Zraiq, M., & Fadzil, F. (2018). The impact of audit committee characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from Jordan. Scholar Journal of Applied Sciences and Research, 1(5), 39-42.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fivi Anggraini, Silvira Helmi, Meihendri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).







