Governance Quality, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors on Tax Compliance: Evidence from Expert Individual Taxpayers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v15i2.31383Keywords:
Governance Quality, Tax Compliance, Tax Knowledge, Tax MoraleAbstract
Purpose: This research aims to examine factors that can increase the level of taxpayer compliance both from an intrinsic and extrinsic perspective and the role of governance quality in this relationship. The intrinsic factor is tax morale and the extrinsic factor is tax knowledge.
Methodology/approach: This research using existing data in the field in the form of surveys allows a broader exploration of the effects of social norms on tax compliance behavior, especially for expert individual taxpayers, who are professionals who have a high level of education on the motivation of reasonable levels of taxpayer compliance, which are intrinsic (tax morals) and extrinsic (tax knowledge). Data processing uses smart PLS 4.0 with Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) equations.
Findings: The research results in the first model, namely without moderation, show that tax morale, tax knowledge, and governance quality significantly positively affect increasing tax compliance. However, the second model, namely moderating governance quality with tax morale and tax knowledge, shows that the results have a significant negative effect on tax compliance, which means that the role of governance quality can weaken the influence of tax morale and tax knowledge on the level of taxpayer compliance.
Practical implications: This research can analyze various factors of taxpayer behavior, incredibly expert individual taxpayers, regarding taxpayer compliance.
Originality/value: Novelty from this research shows that the behavior of individual taxpayers, especially experts who are professionals with a high level of education, shows that various factors of taxpayer behavior can influence the level of taxpayer compliance, especially in the condition of governance quality.
Downloads
References
Alijoyo, A., dan Subartono, Z., (2004), Komisaris Independen: Penggerak Praktik GCG di Perusahaan, PT. Indeks, Jakarta.
Bhargava, S. and D. Manoli (2015). Psychological frictions and the incomplete take-up of social benefitss: Evidence from an irs field experiment. American Economic Review 105 (11), 3489 - 3529.
Benzarti, Y. (2017). How taxing is tax _ling? using revealed preferences to estimate compliance costs. Working Paper 23903, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bergman, M. 2009. Tax Evasion and The Rule of Law in Latin America: The Political Culture of Cheating and Compliance in Argentina and Chile. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania University Press.
Bobek, D.D., Hageman, A.M. & Kelliher, Charles, F. 2013. Analyzing the role of social norms in tax compliance behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 115(3): 451–468.
Chong, K.R. & Arunachalam, M. 2018. Determinants of enforced tax compliance: empirical evidence from Malaysia. Advances in Taxation 25: 147–172.
Christian, R.C. & Alm, J. 2014. Empathy, sympathy, and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology 40: 62–82.
Everest-Phillip, M. & Sandall, R. 2009. Linking Business Tax Reform with Governance: How to Measure Success. Investment Climate in Practice Vol. 2. Washington DC: World Bank.
Gunadi, Prof. Dr. 2012. Keberhasilan Pajak Tergantung Partisipasi Masyarakatnya, dalam Perspektif Baru. http://www.perpsektif.net/articles/view.asp?id=431
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior , Agency Costs and Ownership Structure Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior , Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.
Kemitraan. (2013). Indonesia Governance Index 2012 : “Towards A Well-Informed Society and Responsive Government .” Retrieved from www.kemitraan.or.id/igi.
Mardiasmo. (2005). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Nkundabanyanga, S.K., Mvura, P., Nyamuyonjo, D., Opiso, J. & Nakabuye, Z. 2017. Tax compliance in a developing country: understanding taxpayers’ compliance decision by their perceptions. Journal of Economic Studies 44(6): 931–957.
Ortega, D., Ronconi, L. & Sanguinetti, P. 2016. Reciprocity and willingness to pay taxes: evidence from a survey experiment in Latin America. Economía 16(2): 55–87.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 101 Tahun 2000.
Rahman, A., (2009), Hubungan Sistem Administrasi Perpajakan Modern Dengan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, Vol VI. No 1.
Rodriguez-Justicia, D. & Theilen, B. 2018. Education and tax morale. Journal of Economic Psychology 64: 18–48.
Salam, R. (2021). Perubahan dan Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Di Era New Normal Pandemi Covid-19 Changes and Innovations in Public Services in the New Normal. Journal of Public Administration and Government, 3(1 April), 28–36.
Taing, H.B. & Chang, Y. 2020. Determinants of tax compliance intention: focus on the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Public Administration: 1–12.
Torgler, Benno 2003. Tax Morale and Institutions, Center for Research in Economics, Management and The Arts, September 2003, hal.4.
Torgler, B., Schaffner, M. & Macintyre, A. 2007. Tax compliance, tax morale, and governance quality. Working Paper No. 07-27 Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
Torgler, B. & Schneider, F. 2009. The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology 30(2): 228–245.
Hoopes, J. L., D. H. Reck, & J. Slemrod (2015). Taxpayer search for information: Implications for rational attention. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 7 (3),177- 208.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indah Masri, Tryas Chasbiandani, Diandra Kamila Rasyid, Nur’Aini

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).







