Evaluating GRI Standards Implementation Quality and Greenwashing Practices in PT Pertamina (Persero)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v16i1.36616Keywords:
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Greenwashing, PT Pertamina (Persero), Sustainability Report, TransparencyAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the application of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards in the sustainability report of PT Pertamina (Persero) for the 2021-2023 period and analyze the potential for greenwashing practices in the report.
Methodology/approach: Utilizing the content analysis method, this study assessed the quality of the report based on GRI principles, both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Findings: PT Pertamina (Persero) consistently enhances its sustainability report disclosure quality, with general disclosures reaching 100% over three years. Material topic disclosure is expected to increase from 70% (2021) to 94% (2023). The Greenwashing Index (GI) stabilized at 0.72, indicating low greenwashing levels. Results suggest a strong commitment to transparency and accountability, but ongoing evaluation of greenwashing practices is necessary.
Practical implications: This study contributes significantly to understanding the effectiveness of GRI implementation in the Indonesian oil and gas sector and provides recommendations for other companies and regulators to enhance the quality of sustainability reports.
Originality/value: This study analyzes the quality of sustainability reports both quantitatively and qualitatively. The researcher also added an analysis of greenwashing practices.
Downloads
References
Amran, A., & Ooi, S. K. (2014). Sustainability Reporting: Meeting Stakeholder Demands. In Strategic Direction. https://doi.org/10.1108/sd-03-2014-0035
Badia, F., Bracci, E., & Tallaki, M. (2020). Quality and Diffusion of Social and Sustainability Reporting in Italian Public Utility Companies. Sustainability, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114525
Cardoni, A., Kiseleva, E., Terzani, S. (2019). Evaluating the Intra-Industry Comparability of Sustainability Reports: The Case of the Oil and Gas Industry. Sustainability, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041093
Daromes, F. E., Holly, A., & Loeferdy, M. (2023). Analisis Aspek Materialitas Dalam Pelaporan Keberlanjutan. Wacana Ekonomi (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi), 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22225/we.22.1.2023.1-17
Down to Earth, D. (2001). ACEH: Gugatan Hukum Terhadap Exxon Mobil atas keterlibatannya dalam pelanggaran HAM di Aceh. Downtoearth-Indonesia.Org. https://www.downtoearth-indonesia.org/id/story/aceh-gugatan-hukum-terhadap-exxon-mobil-atas-keterlibatannya-dalam-pelanggaran-ham-di-aceh
Farhana, S. & Adelina, Y. E. (2019). Relevansi Nilai Laporan Keberlanjutan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 10(3), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2019.10.3.36
GRI. (2021). GRI Standards. Global Reporting Initiative. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. (2014). Legitimizing Negative Aspects in GRI-Oriented Sustainability Reporting: A Qualitative Analysis of Corporate Disclosure Strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1801-4
Imandiar, Y. (2021). Sustainability Report Pertamina Raih 2 Penghargaan Internasional. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5677583/sustainability-report-pertamina-raih-2-penghargaan-internasional
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (Fourth Edi). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Martínez-Ferrero, J., García-Sánchez, I.-M., & Ruiz-Barbadillo, E. (2018). The quality of sustainability assurance reports: The expertise and experience of assurance providers as determinants. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1181–1196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2061
Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8
Netto, S. V., de F., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A.R. B., & Soares, G. R. da L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3
Orazalin, N. & Mahmood, M. (2019). Determinants of GRI-based Sustainability Reporting: Evidence From an Emerging Economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(1), 140–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-12-2018-0137
Perry, P. & Towers, N. (2013). Conceptual framework development. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(5/6), 478–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2012-0107
Pristiandaru, D. L. (2024). 57 Perusahaan Bertanggung Jawab Atas 80 Persen Emisi Global. Kompas.Com. https://lestari.kompas.com/read/2024/04/04/140000286/57-perusahaan-bertanggung-jawab-atas-80-persen-emisi-global?page=all
Priyo, A. M., & Haryanto. (2022). Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Pada Laporan Keberlanjutan Berdasarkan Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standard. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 11(4), 1–15. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting
Qian, W., Tilt, C., Dissanayake, D. M. R., & Kuruppu, S. (2020). Motivations and Impacts of Sustainability Reporting in the Indo‐Pacific Region: Normative and Instrumental Stakeholder Approaches. In Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2577
Sebrina, N., Taqwa, S., Afriyenti, M., Septiari, D. (2023). Analysis of sustainability reporting quality and corporate social responsibility on companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2157975
Stocker, F., Arruda, M. P. de, Mascena, K. M. C. de, & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2020). Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Reporting: A Classification Model. In Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1947
Su, W., Zhang, L., Ge, C., & Chen, S. (2022). Association between Internal Control and Sustainability: A Literature Review Based on the SOX Act Framework. Sustainability, 14(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159706
Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Lazzini, A. (2019). Greenwashing and Environmental Communication: Effects on Stakeholders’ Perceptions. In Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2373
Trianaputri, A. R., & Djakman, C. D. (2019). Quality of Sustainability Disclosure Among the Asean-5 Countries and the Role of Stakeholders. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 16(2), 180–205. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2019.10
Xu, W., Li, M., & Xu, S. (2023). Unveiling the “Veil” of information disclosure: Sustainability reporting “greenwashing” and “shared value.” PLoS ONE, 18(1 January), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279904
Yu, E. P., Luu, B., Van, & Chen, C. H. (2020). Greenwashing in environmental, social, and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192
Zorio, A., García-Benau, M. A., & Sierra, L. (2013). Sustainability Development and the Quality of Assurance Reports: Empirical Evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7), 484–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1764
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wiwik Mukholafatul Farida, Achmad Iqbal, Dwi Rahma Fitriani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).







