Evaluating Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Capacity in Government Ministries and Agencies

Authors

  • Anas Isnaeni Master of Accounting Program, Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Viska Anggraita Master of Accounting Program, Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v15i3.40763

Keywords:

Capacity Assessment Framework, Internal Control, Internal Control over Financial Reporting, Government Financial Reporting

Abstract

Purpose: This research aims to evaluate the capacity development of Internal Control over Financial Reporting or Pengendalian Intern atas Pelaporan Keuangan (PIPK), within selected central government ministries and agencies (Kementerian/Lembaga, or K/L). The evaluation is conducted in response to recommendations from the Supreme Audit Agency (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, BPK) and findings from the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan, BPKP), both of which emphasize the need to enhance the quality and effectiveness of PIPK implementation.

Methodology/approach: Employing a qualitative case research design, the research adopts the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Capacity Assessment Framework as its analytical lens. The evaluation focuses on four critical dimensions of capacity—namely, institutional arrangements, leadership, knowledge, and accountability—across four selected ministries and agencies. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and analysis of relevant documents

Findings: The research identifies varying degrees of capacity gaps across the institutions. The most significant gap was found in the leadership dimension, while the accountability dimension exhibited the smallest gap. Key challenges include limited availability of qualified human resources, uneven knowledge management practices, and weak mechanisms for institutional documentation and evaluation.

Practical implications: The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and regulatory bodies to design more targeted capacity-building interventions. These include enhancing leadership engagement, implementing systematic knowledge management strategies, and reinforcing institutional structures to improve the overall effectiveness of PIPK in the public sector.

Originality/value: This research represents one of the initial efforts to apply the UNDP Capacity Assessment Framework to the evaluation of PIPK implementation within Indonesian government institutions. It contributes to a deeper understanding of institutional capacity gaps and offers practical recommendations to enhance the reliability and accountability of public sector financial reporting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Viska Anggraita, Master of Accounting Program, Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Indonesia

References

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. (2020). Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2019. https://www.bpk.go.id/laporan_hasil_pemeriksaan

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. (2021). Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2020. BPK. https://www.bpk.go.id/laporan_hasil_pemeriksaan

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. (2022). Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2021. BPK. https://www.bpk.go.id/laporan_hasil_pemeriksaan

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. (2023). Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2022. BPK. https://www.bpk.go.id/laporan_hasil_pemeriksaan

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. (2024). Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2023. BPK. https://www.bpk.go.id/laporan_hasil_pemeriksaan

Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan. (2024). Laporan Hasil Reviu atas Hasil Penilaian PIPK Unit Akuntansi dan Pelaporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat (UAPP) Tahun 2023. BPKP.

Bimo, I. D., Siregar, S. V., Hermawan, A. A., & Wardhani, R. (2019). Internal control over financial reporting, organizational complexity, and financial reporting quality. International Journal of Economics and Management, 13(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v7i2.20616

COSO. (2013). COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework Executive Summary. https://www.coso.org/_files/ugd/3059fc_1df7d5dd38074006bce8fdf621a942cf.pdf

Cresswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches Second Edition. SAGE Publications.

Deegan, C. (2022). Financial Accounting Theory. Cengage Learning Australia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ak2MEAAAQBAJ

Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan. (2018). Akuntansi dan Pelaporan Keuangan Pemerintah Indonesia dari Masa ke Masa. Directorate General of Treasury. https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/portal/id/akuntansi-dan-pelaporan-keuangan-dari-masa-ke-masa.html

Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan. (2022). Laporan Hasil Penilaian Pengendalian Intern atas Pelaporan Keuangan Unit Akuntansi Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2021. PPID DJPb.

Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan. (2023). Laporan Hasil Penilaian Pengendalian Intern atas Pelaporan Keuangan Unit Akuntansi Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2022. PPID DJPb.

Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan. (2024). Laporan Hasil Penilaian Pengendalian Intern atas Pelaporan Keuangan Unit Akuntansi Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2023. PPID DJPb.

Ellet, W. (2018). The Case Study Handbook: A Student’s Guide Revised Edition. Harvard Business Review Press.

Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Keuangan. (2024). Materi Rapat Koordinasi Tindak Lanjut Rekomendasi Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK RI atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2023.

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 17/PMK.09/2019 tentang Pedoman Penerapan, Penilaian, dan Reviu PIPK Pemerintah Pusat, (2019). https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/dok/17-pmk-09-2019

KPMG. (2023). Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Handbook. https://kpmg.com/kpmg-us/content/dam/kpmg/frv/pdf/2023/handbook-internal-controls-over-financial-reporting.pdf

Lin, T.-L., Liu, W.-H., Chang, Y., & Hsiao, S.-C. (2021). Capacity assessment of integrated coastal management for Taiwanese local government. Marine Policy, 134, 104769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104769

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=tvFICrgcuSIC

Pusdiklat Anggaran dan Perbendaharaan. (2024). S-532/PP.3/2024 Tanggal 23 Desember 2024 tentang Program Pembelajaran bagi Kementerian/Lembaga/Satuan Kerja/Perangkat Daerah/Institusi lainnya (KLDI) Tahun 2025.

Pusdiklatwas BPKP. (2025). Katalog Pelatihan: Penilaian Pengendalian Intern Pelaporan Keuangan. https://pusdiklatwas.bpkp.go.id/training/detail?slug=Penilaian%20Pengendalian%20Intern%20atas%20Pelaporan%20Keuangan

Pusdiklatwas BPKP. (2025). Katalog Pelatihan: Reviu Pengendalian Intern Pelaporan Keuangan. https://pusdiklatwas.bpkp.go.id/training/detail?slug=Reviu%20Pengendalian%20Intern%20Pelaporan%20Keuangan

Radu, C., & Segalin Zanella, A. (2023). The effectiveness of the auditor’s opinion on the internal controls over financial reporting. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 927–939. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2022-0103

Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=NbQgAQAAQBAJ

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Ko6bCgAAQBAJ

Shams, S. R., & Hasan, R. (2020). Capacity building for transnationalisation of higher education: Knowledge management for organisational efficacy. European Business Review, 32(3), 459–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-05-2019-0097

Sofyani, H., Abu Hasan, H., & Saleh, Z. (2023). Does internal control contribute to quality management in higher education institutions? Indonesia's adoption experience of the COSO integrated framework. The TQM Journal, 35(8), 2162–2180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2022-0201

Sarbanes – Oxley Act Section 404 (SOX 404), (2002).

The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2022). Applying the Three Lines Model in the Public Sector. https://www.theiia.org/en/content/articles/2022/applying-the-three-lines-model-in-the-public-sector/

United Nations Development Programme. (2008). Capacity Assessment Methodology User's Guide. http://content-ext.undp.org/aplaws_publications/1670209/UNDP%20Capacity%20Assessment%20Users%20Guide.pdf

United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Supporting Capacity Development the UNDP Approach. https://www.undp.org/publications/support-capacity-development-undp-approach

United Nations Development Programme. (2015). Capacity Development: A UNDP Primer. https://www.undp.org/publications/capacity-development-undp-primer

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=uX1ZDwAAQBAJ

Downloads

Published

2025-08-07