Fraud Risk Assessment: Effects of Bias, Skepticism, and Complexity with Whistleblowing Climate as Moderator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v16i1.42748Keywords:
Audit Complexity, Professional Skepticism, Quality of Fraud Risk Assessment, Unconscious Bias, Whistleblowing ClimateAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to examine the effects of unconscious bias, professional skepticism, and audit complexity on fraud risk assessment quality, and to evaluate the moderating role of whistleblowing climate within organizational audit settings.
Methodology/approach: A quantitative approach using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to data collected from 70 internal auditors working in manufacturing firms in Gresik, Indonesia. The analysis included assessment of the measurement model and hypothesis testing for both direct and moderating effects.
Findings: Results show that professional skepticism significantly improves the quality of fraud risk assessment. Conversely, unconscious bias and audit complexity have negative but statistically insignificant effects. Whistleblowing climate significantly moderates and enhances the influence of professional skepticism but does not moderate the effects of unconscious bias or audit complexity.
Practical implications: Organizations should reinforce professional skepticism through structured training and strengthen ethical infrastructures, particularly whistleblowing systems, to support auditor judgment in fraud detection.
Originality/value: This study integrates behavioral auditor factors with ethical organizational context, offering new empirical evidence on how whistleblowing climate interacts with auditor characteristics in shaping fraud risk assessment quality.
Downloads
References
Achmad, F., Rahman, A., & Bandang, A. (2025). The Influence of Work Experience, Auditor Expertise, and Time Pressure on Audit Quality with Ethics as an Intervening Variable. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(2), 1065–1078-1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i2.6420
Aida, N. (2021). Work experience, obedience pressure and task complexity on audit judgment. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 1(2), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v1i2.51
Anderson, P. D. (2022). On moderate and radical government whistleblowing: Edward Snowden and Julian Assange as theorists of whistleblowing ethics. Journal of media ethics, 37(1), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2021.2014847
Beasley, R., & Lahey, J. (2024). Correspondence Audit Studies in Public Administration: A systematic review with commentary. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 7. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.71.345
Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological inquiry, 34(2).
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x
Cassell, C. A., Dearden, S. M., Rosser, D. M., & Shipman, J. E. (2022). Confirmation bias and auditor risk assessments: Archival evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 41(3), 67-93. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2020-035
Christensen, B., Schmardebeck, R., & Seidel, T. (2022). Do auditors’ incentives affect materiality assessments of prior-period misstatements? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101, 101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101332
Chui, L., Curtis, M. B., & Pike, B. J. (2022). How does an audit or a forensic perspective influence auditors' fraud-risk assessment and subsequent risk response? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 41(4), 57-83. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-19-125
Drogalas, G., Nerantzidis, M., Samaras, M., & Pazarskis, M. (2020). Audit committee and factors that affect its characteristics: the case of Greece. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 17(4), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00081-2
Dyer, J., Hartley, S., & Thompson, A. (2017). Does regional audit improve practice in the management of urological cancers? Journal of Clinical Urology, 10(1), 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415816664265
Eksandy, A. (2024). The Influence of the Whistleblowing System, Internal Audit, and Organizational Culture on the Prevention of Financial Fraud. Paper presented at the Proceeding International Economic Conference of Business and Accounting. https://proceeding.unesa.ac.id/index.php/iecba/article/view/3536
Elder, R. J., & Yebba, A. A. (2023). Auditing nonprofit entities Research Handbook on Nonprofit Accounting (pp. 174-191): Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800888289.00018
Fakhirah, S., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2025). Auditor Behavior Analysis: The Effect of Self-Efficacy, Audit Risk and Audit Experience on Audit Judgment. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v15i2.40645
García‐Sánchez, I. M., Frias‐Aceituno, J. V., & Garcia‐Rubio, R. (2012). Determining factors of audit committee attributes: Evidence from Spain. International Journal of Auditing, 16(2), 184-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2012.00451.x
Glover, S. M., Hansen, J. C., & Seidel, T. A. (2022). How has the change in the way auditors determine the audit report date changed the meaning of the audit report date? Implications for academic research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 41(1), 143-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2561713
Gunawan, K., Riyanal, M. F., & Handoko, B. L. (2022). The effect of auditor competence, professional skepticism, red flag, and internal control system on fraud detection. Journal of Applied Finance and Accounting, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.21512/jafa.v9i2.8972
Hair, J. F., Astrachan, C. B., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100392
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
Jacobson, C. M. (2019). The effect of racial confirmation biases on whistleblowing intent. https://dc.ewu.edu/theses/561
Jensen, R. C., Bird, R. L., & Nichols, B. W. (2022). Risk assessment matrices for workplace hazards: Design for usability. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(5), 2763. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052763
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of management review, 16(2), 366-395. https://doi.org/10.2307/258867
Kamalaruban, P., Pi, Y., Burrell, S., Drage, E., Skalski, P., Wong, J., & Sutton, D. (2024). Evaluating Fairness in Transaction Fraud Models: Fairness Metrics, Bias Audits, and Challenges. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on AI in Finance. https://doi.org/10.1145/3677052.3698666
Kelly, M., & Larres, P. (2025). Enhancing the auditor's mindset: a framework for nurturing professional skepticism. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(1), 222-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-07-2023-0122
Kerler III, W. A., Fleming, A. S., & Allport, C. D. (2021). The Effect of Whistleblower Source and Tip Frame on Internal Auditors' Judgments and Actions. Journal of Forensic Accounting Research, 6(1), 149-175. https://doi.org/10.2308/JFAR-2020-007
Lisa, O., Muawanah, U., Heriyadi, H., & Dahlan, A. (2023). Internal Control As A Mediator Of Audit Quality. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 13(3), 570-587. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v13i3.29188
Liu, J., & Xia, Q. (2024). The impact of industry technology complexity on audit quality. Technology in Society, 79, 102737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102737
Matusiak, B., Sarey Khanie, M., Moscoso, C., Pálsdóttir, A. M., Appelt, S., Hemauer, C., . . . Ysbæk-Nielsen, A. T. (2025). View Quality Assessments: A Pilot Study of Field Methods. Leukos, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2024.2443188
Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Mroueh, H. A. (2024). The Role of Financial Audit in the Corporate Governance Process: An In-depth Analysis. Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati: Fascicle: I, Economics & Applied Informatics, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409385
Ogunsola, K. O., Balogun, E. D., & Ogunmokun, A. S. (2021). Enhancing financial integrity through an advanced internal audit risk assessment and governance model. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(1), 781-790. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2021.2.1.781-790
Perdana, H. D., Mohamed, N., Joseph, C., & Utami, I. (2020). Fraud, Whistleblowing System, and Behavioral Aspect in Public Sector. https://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-8-2019.2294251
Rautiainen, A., Saastamoinen, J., & Pajunen, K. (2024). Auditors’ perceptions of alternative performance measures–alternative truths and professional skepticism. Accounting in Europe, 21(2), 134-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2244509
Robinson, R. S. (2024). Purposive sampling Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 5645-5647): Springer. https//doi.org/10.1007/9789400707535
Safitri, A. E., & Rani, P. (2022). Peran Komisaris Independen, Komite Audit Dan Kualitas Audit Terhadap Integritas Laporan Keuangan Dimoderasi Oleh Whistleblowing System. AkunNas, 19(1), 58-72. https://doi.org/15531149
Saleh, S., Diab, A., & Abouelela, O. (2025). Firm Complexity and the Accuracy of Auditors’ Going Concern Opinions in Emerging Markets: Does Auditor Work Stress Matter? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(3), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18030108
Santoso, A. (2023). Rumus slovin: panacea masalah ukuran sampel? Suksma: Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma, 4(2), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.24071/suksma.v4i2.6434
Shaub, M. K., & Lawrence, J. E. (1996). Ethics, Experience and Professional Skepticism: A Situational Analysis. Behavioral research in Accounting, 8. https://doi.org/ 10007134349
Shonhadji, N., & Maulidi, A. (2021). The roles of whistleblowing system and fraud awareness as financial statement fraud deterrent. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(3), 370-389. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-09-2020-0140
Sigit, H. (2021). Can Retaliation Moderate The Influence Of Personal Cost, Professional Commitment And Ethical Environment On Pns Interest In Whistleblowing? Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v11i2.16902
Smith, J. M. (2021). Whistleblowing as Historical Artifact: Administrative Corruption Meets Truth-Telling in Prerevolutionary France. The Journal of Modern History, 93(3), 533-565. https://doi.org/10.1215/00161071-9746643
Stairs, L. S. (2023). The Relationship Between Fraud Risk Assessment Performance and Internal Auditors’ Functions: A Comparative Case Study Analysis: Delaware State University. https://doi/org/451461318609
Stein, E., & Cunha, P. R. d. (2024). Professional skepticism of internal auditors and perception of risks in internal controls. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 35(96), e1922. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20241922.en
Stubben, S. R., & Welch, K. T. (2020). Evidence on the use and efficacy of internal whistleblowing systems. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(2), 473-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12303
Tümmler, M., & Quick, R. (2025). How to detect fraud in an audit: a systematic review of experimental literature. Management Review Quarterly, 1-46. https/doi.org/10.1007/s11301024004807
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1738360
Urumsah, D., Rahmida, M., Hamdani, R., & Aji, S. S. B. (2023). The impact of whistle-blowing on the effectiveness of forensic audits and investigative audits in fraud detection: A multigroup analysis of gender and experience. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 163-179. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol5.iss3.art4
Utami, N. M. M. A., Irianto, G., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2020). Analyzing the effect of financial reward, personal cost and reporting channel on whistleblowing intentions utilizing an experimental study. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 9(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.614
Vessey, I., & Galletta, D. (1991). Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Information systems research, 2(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.1.63
Vijayalakshmi, D., & Jeevan, J. (2024). Forensic Accounting: Uncovering Fraud with Advanced Analytics. Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.48165/bapas.2024.44.2.1
Virani, A., & Khairani, S. (2023). Peran Frekuensi Rapat Komite Audit dimoderasi Whistleblowing System Terhadap Pengungkapan Fraud. Paper presented at the MDP Student Conference. https://doi.org/ 14621-1-10-20230411
Williams, D. L. (2025). Can Professional Judgment Be Taught to Auditors? An Experimental Investigation of Abilities and Implicit Beliefs. The University of Memphis. https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/etd/3777
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gusti Muhammad Rizal, Dewi Diah Fakhriyyah, Afifudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
