Pemharuh Belas Kasih Terhadap Perilaku Prososial Dimoderasi Oleh Kebutuhan Kognisi Pada Remaja Yang Kehilangan Orang Tua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/pjsp.v3i1.24548Keywords:
Belas Kasih, Perilaku Prososial, Kebutuhan KognisiAbstract
Prosocial behavior provides satisfaction and well-being for individuals. Prosocial behavior is related to great compassion. Individuals with high compassion have a sense of responsibility for the well-being of others to behave prosocially. The need for cognition moderates the influence. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of compassion on prosocial behavior moderated by cognition needs. Research subjects as many as 232 students aged 15-18 years. The research instrument used the Compassion Subscale of the Dispositional Positive Emotion Scale (DPES-CS), the Prosocialness Scale for Adults (PSA), the Need for Cognition Scale (NCS-6), Data was analyzed using Moderated Regression Analysis. The results showed that the positive influence and significantly decreased compassion towards prosocial behavior moderated by cognition needs (β = -0.072; p = 0.017). The contribution of compassion to prosocial behavior is moderated by the need for cognition, which was equal to 64.7
Downloads
References
Afolabi, O. A. (2014). Psychosocial predictors of prosocial behaviour among a sample of Nigerian undergraduates. European Scientific Journal, 10(2).
https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2014.v10n2p%25p.
Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55(1), 19–39.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x.
Bengtsson, H., Söderström, M., & Terjestam, Y. (2016). The structure and development of dispositional compassion in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(6), 840–873.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615594461.
Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20.
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598298.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11(4), 302–306.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00260.
Caprara, G. V., Kanacri, B. P. L., Gerbino, M., Zuffiano, A., Alessandri, G., Vecchio, G., Caprara, E., Pastorelli, C., & Bridglall, B. (2014). Positive effects of promoting prosocial behavior in early adolescence: Evidence from a school-based intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(4), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414531464.
Caprara, G. V., & Steca, P. (2005). Self–efficacy beliefs as determinants of prosocial behavior conducive to life satisfaction across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(2), 191–217.
https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.24.2.191.62271.
Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Zelli, A., & Capanna, C. (2005). A new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 77–89. https://doi.10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77.
Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440.
Carlo, G., White, R. M. B., Streit, C., Knight, G. P., & Zeiders, K. H. (2018). Longitudinal relations among parenting styles, prosocial behaviors, and academic outcomes in US Mexican adolescents. Child Development, 89(2), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12761.
Cavanaugh, L. A., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (2015). Feeling love and doing more for distant others: Specific positive emotions differentially affect prosocial consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(5), 657–673.
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0219.
Chen, E., & Matthews, K. A. (2001). Cognitive appraisal biases: An approach to understanding the relation between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular reactivity in children. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23(2), 101–111.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2302_4.
Cole, P. M., Armstrong, L. M., & Pemberton, C. K. (2010). The role of language in the development of emotion regulation. DOI:10.1037/12059-004.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
Djudiah, & Yuniardi, S. M. (2011). Model Pengembangan Konsep Diri Melalui Support Group Therapy : Upaya Meminimalkan Trauma Psikis Remaja Dari Keluarga Single Parent Self Concept Development Model Through Support Group Therapy : an Effort To Minimize Psychological Trauma for. Proyeksi, 6, 16–26.
Donald, J. N., Sahdra, B. K., Van Zanden, B., Duineveld, J. J., Atkins, P. W. B., Marshall, S. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2019). Does your mindfulness benefit others? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the link between mindfulness and prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12338.
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. 1998. (1998). Prosocial Development. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, 3, 701–778.
Eisenberg, N. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Links with self-regulation, moral judgment, and moral behavior. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-007.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2007). Prosocial development. Handbook of Child Psychology, 3.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0311.
Gerbino, M., Zuffianò, A., Eisenberg, N., Castellani, V., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Pastorelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2018). Adolescents’ prosocial behavior predicts good grades beyond intelligence and personality traits. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12309.
Gintis, H. (2000). Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111.
Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 351–374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018807.
Grube, J. A., & Piliavin, J. A. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences, and volunteer performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1108–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611007.
Guo, Q., Sun, P., Cai, M., Zhang, X., & Song, K. (2019). Why are smarter individuals more prosocial? A study on the mediating roles of empathy and moral identity. Intelligence, 75, 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.02.006.
Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & May, D. R. (2011). Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 663–685.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0128.
Hay, P. K., Gross, M. U. M., Hoekman, K., & Rogers, K. B. (2007). Prosocial reasoning and empathy in gifted children. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 16(2), 5–14.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hofmann, S. G., Grossman, P., & Hinton, D. E. (2011). Loving-kindness and compassion meditation: Potential for psychological interventions. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(7), 1126–1132.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.003.
Horcajo, J., Santos, D., Guyer, J. J., & Moreno, L. (2019). Changing attitudes and intentions related to doping: An analysis of individual differences in need for cognition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(24), 2835–2843.
doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1665876.
Hur, Y.-M. (2020). Relationships between cognitive abilities and prosocial behavior are entirely explained by shared genetic influences: A Nigerian twin study. Intelligence, 82, 101483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101483.
James, R. N. (2011). Charitable giving and cognitive ability. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(1), 70–83.
https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.402.
Jinpa, T. (2010). Compassion cultivation training (CCT): Instructor’s manual. Unpublished, Stanford, CA.
https://doi.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190464684.013.18.
Kernochan, R. A., Mccormick, D. W., & White, J. A. (2007). Spirituality and the management teacher: Reflections of three Buddhists on compassion, mindfulness, and selflessness in the classroom. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492606297545.
Kidron, Y., & Fleischman, S. (2006). Promoting Adolescents’ Prosocial Behavior. Educational Leadership, 63(7), 90–91.
Kishon‐Barash, R., Midlarsky, E., & Johnson, D. R. (1999). Altruism and the Vietnam War veteran: The relationship of helping to symptomatology. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 12(4), 655–662.
Laible, D., McGinley, M., Carlo, G., Augustine, M., & Murphy, T. (2014). Does engaging in prosocial behavior make children see the world through rose-colored glasses? Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 872–880.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033905.
Lan, X., Ma, C., & Radin, R. (2019). Parental autonomy support and psychological well-being in Tibetan and Han emerging adults: A serial multiple mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 621.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00621.
Lan, X., Marci, T., & Moscardino, U. (2019). Parental autonomy support, grit, and psychological adjustment in Chinese adolescents from divorced families. Journal of Family Psychology, 33(5), 511–520.
https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000514.
Lan, X., & Wang, W. (2020). Is early left-behind experience harmful to prosocial behavior of emerging adult? The role of parental autonomy support and mindfulness. Current Psychology, 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00706-3.
Latipun. (2017). Psikologi Konseling (Fourth Edi). UMM Press.
Latipun. (2019). Kesehatan mental (Fifth Edit). UMM Press.
Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). Kindness counts: Prompting prosocial behavior in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being. PloS One, 7(12), e51380.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051380.
Levin, I. P., Huneke, M. E., & Jasper, J. D. (2000). Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need for cognition and inclusion–exclusion effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2881.
Lichter, D. T., Shanahan, M. J., & Gardner, E. L. (2002). Helping others? The effects of childhood poverty and family instability on prosocial behavior. Youth & Society, 34(1), 89–119.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X02034001004.
Lim, D., & DeSteno, D. (2016). Suffering and compassion: The links among adverse life experiences, empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior. Emotion, 16(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000144.
Lindenberg, S. (2006). Prosocial behavior, solidarity, and framing processes. In Solidarity and prosocial behavior (pp. 23–44).
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28032-4_2.
Lins de Holanda Coelho, G., HP Hanel, P., & J. Wolf, L. (2020). The very efficient assessment of need for cognition: Developing a six-item version. Assessment, 27(8), 1870–1885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118793208.
Lovecky, D. V. (2009). Moral sensitivity in young gifted children. In Morality, ethics, and gifted minds (pp. 161–176). DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-89368-6_13.
Marbell‐Pierre, K. N., Grolnick, W. S., Stewart, A. L., & Raftery‐Helmer, J. N. (2019). Parental autonomy support in two cultures: The moderating effects of adolescents’ self‐construals. Child Development, 90(3), 825–845.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12947.
Meiklejohn, J., Phillips, C., Freedman, M. L., Griffin, M. L., Biegel, G., Roach, A., Frank, J., Burke, C., Pinger, L., & Soloway, G. (2012). Integrating mindfulness training into K-12 education: Fostering the resilience of teachers and students. Mindfulness, 3(4), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0094-5.
Miller, J. G., Kahle, S., Lopez, M., & Hastings, P. D. (2015). Compassionate love buffers stress-reactive mothers from fight-or-flight parenting. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038236.
Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. (2007). Altruistic behavior as a costly signal of general intelligence. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(2), 316–326.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.04.002.
Ngai, S. S., Xie, L., Ng, Y., & Ngai, H. (2018). The effects of parenting behavior on prosocial behavior of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 87, 154–162.
https://doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.02.030.
Osberg, T. M. (1987). The convergent and discriminant validity of the need for cognition scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51:3, 441–450.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5103_11.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nielson, M. G., & Day, R. D. (2016). The role of parental warmth and hostility on adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward multiple targets. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(3), 331–340.
https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000157.
Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Loersch, C., & McCaslin, M. J. (2009). The need for cognition. Handbook of individual differences in social behavior, 318-329.
Preckel, K., Kanske, P., & Singer, T. (2018). On the interaction of social affect and cognition: empathy, compassion and theory of mind. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.010.
Richaud, M. C., Mesurado, B., & Lemos, V. (2013). Links between perception of parental actions and prosocial behavior in early adolescence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(5), 637–646.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9617-x.
Runehov, A. (2016). Cognitive or affective? A philosophical analysis of modes of understanding compassion. In Issues in Science and Theology: Do Emotions Shape the World? (pp. 87–96). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26769-2_7.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.
Schmidt, K. M., Llewellyn, P. L., Taylor, G. J., Weber, P. G., Hong, B., Sellers, R., Wise, C., Wolak, C., McGaw, L., & Nielson, S. (2003). Cloninger’s temperament and character inventory correlates with personality characteristics of organ donation advocates. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 10(3), 173–185.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 878–891.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878.
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: the self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482.
Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2006). Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with Big Five personality and attachment style. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 61–71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760500510833.
Staub, E. (2005). The roots of goodness: the fulfillment of basic human needs and the development of caring, helping and nonaggression, inclusive caring, moral courage, active bystandership, and altruism born of suffering. Moral motivation through the life span, 33–72.
Staub, E., & Vollhardt, J. (2008). Altruism born of suffering: The roots of caring and helping after victimization and other trauma. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78(3), 267–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014223.
Stellar, J. E., Manzo, V. M., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2012). Class and compassion: socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering. Emotion, 12(3), 449–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026508.
Strobel, A., Grass, J., Pohling, R., & Strobel, A. (2017). Need for cognition as a moral capacity. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 42–51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.023.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods) (Sutopo (ed.)). Alfabeta CV.
Surin, B. (1978). Terjemah dan Tafsir Al Quran 30 Juz. Fa. Sumatra.
Thompson, R., & Haddock, G. (2012). Sometimes stories sell: When are narrative appeals most likely to work? European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.850.
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2011). Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion, 11(2), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021302.
Vollhardt, J. R., & Staub, E. (2011). Inclusive altruism born of suffering: The relationship between adversity and prosocial attitudes and behavior toward disadvantaged outgroups. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(3), 307–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01099.x.
Von Salisch, M., Haenel, M., & Freund, P. A. (2013). Emotion understanding and cognitive abilities in young children. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.001.
Wang, L., & Mesman, J. (2015). Child development in the face of rural-to-urban migration in China: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 813–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615600145.
Wen, M., & Lin, D. (2012). Child development in rural China: Children left behind by their migrant parents and children of nonmigrant families. Child Development, 83(1), 120–136.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tumpuk Indrayati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Psychological Journal: Science and Practice (PJSP) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Psychological Journal: Science and Practice (PJSP), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published wor (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
