SOLIDARITY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC ( A CASE STUDY ON THE SOCIAL ACTION OF YOGYAKARTA FOOD SOLIDARITY AND THE INTERFAITH NETWORK FOR COVID-19 RESPONSE)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jp.v2i2.12849

Keywords:

Jaringan Lintas Iman Tanggap Covid-19 (JIC), Pandemic Covid-19, Solidaritas Pangan Jogja (SPJ), Social Capital, Social Movement

Abstract

Reality pandemic Covid-19 has a significant impact on the social, economic, political, and cultures around the world. Covid-19 which hit Indonesia has brought organic collective awareness from civilians through social movements. Initiatives from citizens to help one another are based on three things; the existence of a collective identity, a sense of injustice, and solidarity. This research focuses on two social movements initiated by ‘Solidaritas Pangan Jogja’ (SPJ) and ‘Jaringan Lintas Iman Tanggap Covid-19’ (JIC). The basic principles of mutual assistance, spontaneous collective awareness, and the same social needs form a pattern of solidarity and social movement in these two organizations. Therefore, this research focuses on the process of forming social awareness patterns that are manifested through collective behavior. This research uses a qualitative approach through case studies. Social solidarity and social movements are two concepts that are used as a basis for data analysis. There are two differences between the SPJ and JIC movement patterns. This research uses a qualitative approach through case studies. Social solidarity and social movements are two concepts that are used as a basis for data analysis. There are two differences between the SPJ and JIC movement patterns. The SPJ movement can be categorized as a conventional social movement with an orientation towards creating collective and cross-class social awareness. Whereas the JIC movement is a kind of new social movement which using the basics of the collectivity to understand norms and religious values. While the similarity of the two movements is always to prioritize the distribution of human values that are sustainable. The determining factor for the formation of a collective movement depends not only on the material resources available, but rather on the strength of ideas and cultural resources. That is about the articulation and collective construction of a new relationship (or redefinition) between the person as an individual and the person (as an ulama or cleric, citizen, and family). The SPJ movement carries the value of nativism while the JIC movement is a representation of the growth of new social movements that arise because of the spread of religious values in the social, cultural, economic, and political dimensions as citizens.

Keywords: Pandemic Covid-19, Solidaritas Pangan Jogja (SPJ), Jaringan Lintas Iman           Tanggap Covid-19 (JIC), Social Capital, Social Movement

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurachman, Pandemi, Solidaritas Perkuat Imunitas dalam Menjaga Nalar Mencari Jalan Keluar. 2020. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.

Alyusi, Shiefti Dyah. 2016. Media Sosial: Interaksi, Identitas dan Modal Sosial. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Anthony Gidden, Philip W. Sutton. Essential Concepts in Sociology-Polity (2014). London: Polity.

Brysk, A. (1995) ‘“Hearts and Minds”: Bringing Symbolic Politics Back In’, Polity. doi: 10.2307/3234960.

Davis, G. F. et al. (2005) Social movements and organization theory, Social Movements and Organization Theory. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791000.

Durkheim, E. (2016) ‘The division of labor in society’, in Social Theory Re-Wired: New Connections to Classical and Contemporary Perspectives: Second Edition. doi: 10.4324/9781315775357.

Field, J. (2003) Social capital, Social Capital. doi: 10.4324/9780203634080.

Fukuyama, F. (2001) ‘Social capital, civil society and development’, Third World Quarterly. doi: 10.1080/713701144.

Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994) ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’, in Handbook of qualitative research.

Kuhn, T. S. (2013) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001.

Stolley, K. S. (2005) The Basics of Sociology, Technometrics. doi: 10.1198/tech.2003.s153.

Hidayat, Syarief. 2020. ‘Covid-19 dan Tantangan Demokrasi di Indonesia’, Jakarta. Makalah seminar.

Okruhlik, Gwenn. Membuat Perbincangan Diizinkan (Islamisme dan Reformasi di Arab Saudi) dalam Islamic Activism: A Social Movement Theory Approach -Aktivisme Islam: Pendekatan Teori Gerakan Sosial-Terjemahan). Cetakan II, Januari 2018.Yogyakarta: Gading Publishing dan Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina.

Peter Barke. History and Social Theory. 1993.New York: Cornell University Press.

Rochadi, Sigit. Gerakan Sosial di Era Transisi Kapitalisme, Pengalaman Indonesia. Jurnal Bumantara No.1 Vol.1 Tahun 2010. Jakarta: FISIP Universitas Nasional dan FSS Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

S. Perdanakusuma, David. 2020. Covid-19 Mengubah Budaya, dalam Menjaga Nalar, Mencari Jalan Keluar. Universitas Airlangga: Surabaya.

Sari, Y. I. 2020. Sisi Terang Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 89-94.

Sartono Kartodirdjo. 1984. Ratu Adil. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.

Wictorowicz, Quintan. Januari 2018. Aktivisme Islam: Pendekatan Teori Gerakan Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gading Publishing dan Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina.

Widodo, Suko. 2020. Solidaritas Warga Melawan Penularan Corona dalam ‘Menjaga Nalar, Mencari Jalan Keluar. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.

Downloads

Published

22-09-2020

How to Cite

Haryadi, D., & Malitasari, D. N. (2020). SOLIDARITY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC ( A CASE STUDY ON THE SOCIAL ACTION OF YOGYAKARTA FOOD SOLIDARITY AND THE INTERFAITH NETWORK FOR COVID-19 RESPONSE). Jurnal Partisipatoris, 2(2), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.22219/jp.v2i2.12849