THE ACCEPTABILITY OF RHETORICAL QUESTION TRANSLATION IN FIVE ON A TREASURE ISLAND BY ENID BLYTON
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v4i2.5957Abstract
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi fungsi pertanyaan retoris dan mendeskripsikan kualitas terjemahan, khususnya pada tingkat keberterimaan dalam novel Five On A Treasure Island karya Enid Blyton dan terjemahannya dalam bahasa Indonesia Lima Sekawan Di Pulau Harta yang diterjemahkan oleh Agus Setiadi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu kualitatif deskriptif melalui analisis konten dan focus group discussion (FGD). Hasil temuan pada penelitian ini terdapat 14 fungsi pertanyaan retoris dari 177 data yang ditemukan, yaitu memastikan (71 data), menunjukkan rasa heran/kaget (36 data), menekankan fakta yang sudah diketahui (12 data), menyarankan (11 data), mengajak (10 data), menunjukkan keragu-raguan/ketidakpastian (8 data), menunjukkan kekaguman (8 data), memerintah (6 data), meminta (4 data), menunjukkan rasa marah (3 data), menunjukkan kebingungan (3 data), mengeluh (2 data), memperkenalkan topik baru (2 data), dan mengingatkan (1 data). Terdapat 9 fungsi baru pertanyaan retoris yang ditemukan dalam penelitian ini yang sebelumnya belum disebutkan oleh Larson (1998) dan hasil FGD menunjukkan bahwa kualitas terjemahan pertanyaan retoris, khususnya tingkat keberterimaan, menghasilkan terjemahan dengan kualitas yang cukup baik atau berterima. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pertanyaan retoris merepresentasikan banyak fungsi dalam sebuah percakapan dan untuk penerjemah, dalam menerjemahkan pertanyaan retoris sebaiknya memahami maksud pertanyaan retoris pada teks bahasa sumber dengan baik.
Kata kunci: pertanyaan retoris, penerjemahan, kualitas terjemahan, keberterimaan
Abstract
This study aims to identify the function of rhetorical questions and to describe the quality of the translation in terms of acceptability on the novel of Five On A Treasure Island by Enid Blyton and its Indonesian translation Lima Sekawan Di Pulau Harta translated by Agus Setiadi. The research method used in this study is a descriptive qualitative with content analysis and focus group discussion (FGD). The findings are: there are 14 functions of rhetorical questions from 177 data identified, namely: to confirm (71 data), to show surprise (36 data), emphasize a known fact (12 data), to suggest (11 data), to persuade (10 data), to show uncertainty (8 data), to show amazement (8 data), to command (6 data), to request (4 data), to show angry (3 data), to show confusion (3 data), to complain (2 data), to introduce a new topic (2 data), and to admonish (1 data). There are 9 new functions of rhetorical questions that have not been identified from Larson’s concept (1998) and from FGD shows the quality of rhetorical questions translation in terms of acceptability of the novel is high quality translation. The results of this study is rhetorical question represents many functions in conversation and the translator should be wisely in understanding the intention of rhetorical questions in the source text.
Keywords: rhetorical question, translation, quality of translation, acceptability
Downloads
References
References
Al-Fadda, N.A. (2010). The Translation of Rhetorical Question in Hadith from Arabic into English: A Functionalist Perspective. Thesis. King Saud University: Saudi Arabia.
Arfani, S. (2016). Analisis kalimat tanya pada percakapan dalam novel Pride and Prejudice karya Jane Austen. Wanastra, Vol. VIII. No. 2, September 2016. 1-9.
Ellingworth, P. (2013). “When did we see you…?” Translating Rhetorical Question. The Bible Transator, 64(1), 64-74. Doi: 10.1177/0260093513481149.
Larson, M. L. (1998). Meaning –based translation: a guide to cross-language equivalent (2nd edition). New York: University Press of America.
Moleong, L. J. (2005). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Karya: Jakarta.
Nababan, M. R. (2008). Teori menerjemah bahasa Inggris. Kanisius: Yogyakarta.
Nababan, M. R., Ardiana Nuraeni, Sumardiono. (2012). Pengembangan model penilaian kualitas terjemahan. Kajian linguistic dan sastra, Vol. 24. No. 1, Juni 2012. 39-57.
Sutopo, H. B. (2006). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with The KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY 3.0).
Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal).
Authors grant KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
_.png)
