This is an outdated version published on 2021-06-22. Read the most recent version.

Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics Method for Cross-flow Turbine in Pico Scale

Authors

Dendy Adanta Universitas Sriwijaya http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5701-8274
Aji Putro Prakoso Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Manufacturing Technology, Universitas Jendral Achmad Yani, Cimahi. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-7352
Dewi Puspita Sari Study Program of Mechanical Engineering Education, Universitas Sriwijaya. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-0778

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jemmme.v6i1.12813

Keywords:

Pico hydro, cross-flow turbine, CFD, RANS, RNG k-ɛ, 6-DoF approach

Abstract

Crisis electricity was a crucial issue in the rural area. Crossflow turbine (CFT) in pico in pico scale is the best option for electricity provider for rural areas. Due to its usefulness and development of computer technology, computational fluid dynamics method application for CFT study becomes increasingly frequent. This paper compiles the implementation of the computational fluid dynamic (CFD) approach for CFT on a pico scale. Based on the literature, the Renormalization Group (RNG) turbulence model is recommended to predict the flow field that occurs in CFT because its error is lower than others turbulence models, the RNG error of 3.08%, standard of 3.19%, and transitional SST of 3.10%. Furthermore, six-degrees of freedom (6-DoF) is recommended because it has an error of 3.1% than a moving mesh of 9.5% for the unsteady approach. Thus, based on the review, the RNG turbulence model and 6-DoF are recommended for the CFT on the pico scale.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adanta D, Hindami R, Budiarso, Warjito, Siswantara AI. Blade Depth Investigation on Cross-flow Turbine by Numerical Method. In: 2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST). Yogyakarta: IEEE; 2018. p. 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTC.2018.8528291

Chichkhede S, Verma V, Gaba VK, Bhowmick S. A simulation based study of flow velocities across cross flow turbine at different nozzle openings. Procedia Technology. 2016;25:974–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.190

Mockmore CA, Merryfield F. The Banki water-turbine. Vol. 25, Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin Series. Engineering Experiment Station, Oregon State System of Higher Education, Oregon State College Corvallis, Ore, USA; 1949. 1–28 p.

Kaniecki M, Steller J. Flow Analysis through a Reaction Cross-Flow Turbine. In: Proceedings of Conference on modelling fluid flow CMFF. 2003. p. 2003–6.

Siswantara AI, Budiarso, Prakoso AP, Gunadi GGR, Warjito, Adanta D. Assessment of Turbulence Model for Cross-Flow Pico Hydro Turbine Numerical Simulation. CFD Letters [Internet]. 2018;10:38–48. Available from: akademiabaru.com

Adanta D, Budiarso, Warjito, Siswantara AI, Prakoso AP. Performance Comparison of NACA 6509 and 6712 on Pico Hydro Type Cross-Flow Turbine by Numerical Method. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences. 2018;45:116–27.

Aziz NM, Desai VR. A Laboratory study to improve the efficiency of cross-flow turbines. South Caroline; 1993.

FUKUTOMI J, NAKASE Y, Watanabe T. A numerical method of free jet from a cross-flow turbine nozzle. Bulletin of JSME. 1985;28(241):1436–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.28.1436

Sammartano V, Aricò C, Carravetta A, Fecarotta O, Tucciarelli T. Banki-Michell optimal design by computational fluid dynamics testing and hydrodynamic analysis. Energies. 2013;6(5):2362–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en6052362

Acharya N, Kim C-G, Thapa B, Lee Y-H. Numerical analysis and performance enhancement of a cross-flow hydro turbine. Renewable energy. 2015;80:819–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.064

Adhikari RC, Wood DH. A new nozzle design methodology for high efficiency crossflow hydro turbines. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2017;41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.09.004

Adanta D, Budiarso, Warjito, Siswantara AI. Assessment of Turbulence Modelling for Numerical Simulations into Pico Hydro Turbine. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences. 2018;46:21–31.

Aziz NM, Totapally HGS. Design Parameter refinement for improved Cross-Flow turbine performance. Engineering Report. 1994;

Pereira NHC, Borges JE. Study of the nozzle flow in a cross-flow turbine. International journal of mechanical sciences. 1996;38(3):283–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(95)00055-0

Ansys I. ANSYS FLUENT theory guide. Canonsburg, Pa. 2011;794.

Choi Y-D, Lim J-I, Kim Y-T, Lee Y-H. Performance and internal flow characteristics of a cross-flow hydro turbine by the shapes of nozzle and runner blade. Journal of fluid science and technology. 2008;3(3):398–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1299/jfst.3.398

De Andrade J, Curiel C, Kenyery F, Aguillón O, Vásquez A, Asuaje M, Aguilln O, Vásquez A, Asuaje M, Aguillón O, Vásquez A, Asuaje M. Numerical investigation of the internal flow in a Banki turbine. International Journal of Rotating Machinery. 2011;2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/841214

Sammartano V, Morreale G, Sinagra M, Collura A, Tucciarelli T. Experimental study of cross-flow micro-turbines for aqueduct energy recovery. Procedia Engineering. 2014;89:540–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.476

Sammartano V, Morreale G, Sinagra M, Tucciarelli T. Numerical and experimental investigation of a cross-flow water turbine. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 2016;54(3):321–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2016.1147500

Adhikari RC, Wood DH. Computational analysis of part-load flow control for crossflow hydro-turbines. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2018;45:38–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.04.003

Adhikari R, Wood D. Computational Analysis of a Double-Nozzle Crossflow Hydroturbine. Energies. 2018;11(12):3380.

ANSYS FLUENT UDF Manual. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS, Inc; 2011.

Adanta D, Prakoso AP, Siswantara AI, Warjito, Budiarso. Simplification Design of Nozzle and Blade of Pico Hydro Turbine type Cross-flow. In: 17th Annual National Ceminar on Mechanical Engineering (SNTTM XVII). Kupang: BKSTM; 2018. p. 212–7.

Khosrowpanah S, Fiuzat AA, Albertson ML. Experimental study of cross-flow turbine. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1988;114(3):299–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:3(299)

Maciej Kaniecki. Modernization of the outflow system of cross-flow turbines. Task Quarterly. 2002;6(4):601–8.

Nakase Y. A study of cross-flow turbine (effects of nozzle shape on its performance). In: ASME 103rd Winter Annual Meeting. 1982.

FUKUTOMI J, SENOO Y, NAKASE Y. A numerical method of flow through a cross-flow runner. JSME international journal Ser 2, Fluids engineering, heat transfer, power, combustion, thermophysical properties. 1991;34(1):44–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeb1988.34.1_44

Adhikari R, Wood D. The Design of High Efficiency Crossflow Hydro Turbines: A Review and Extension. Energies. 2018;11(2):267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020267

Durgin WW, Fay WK. Some fluid flow characteristics of a cross-flow type hydraulic turbine. Small Hydro Power Fluid Machinery. 1984;p77-83.

Versteeg HKHK, Malalasekera W. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method. Fluid flow handbook. McGraw-Hill. Pearson Education; 2007. 267 p.

Choi YD, Lim JI, Kim CG, Kim YT, Lee YH. CFD analysis for the performance of cross-flow hydraulic turbine with the variation of blade angle. In: New Trends in Fluid Mechanics Research. Springer; 2007. p. 428–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75995-9_140

Choi Y-D, Lim J-I, Kim Y-T, Lee Y-H. Internal Flow Characteristics of Cross-Flow Hydraulic Turbine with the Variation of Nozzle Shape. In: ASME/JSME 2007 5th Joint Fluids Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection; 2007. p. 1089–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/FEDSM2007-37541

Sinagra M, Sammartano V, Aricò C, Collura A, Tucciarelli T. Cross-Flow turbine design for variable operating conditions. Procedia Engineering. 2014;70:1539–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.170

Sammartano V, Aricò C, Sinagra M, Tucciarelli T. Cross-Flow Turbine Design for Energy Production and Discharge Regulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2015;141(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000977

Fluent A. ANSYS fluent theory guide 15.0. ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA. 2013;

Prakoso AP, Warjito, Siswantara AI, Budiarso, Adanta D. Comparison Between 6-DOF UDF and Moving Mesh Approaches in CFD Methods for Predicting Cross-Flow Pico- Hydro Turbine Performance. CFD Letters. 2019;11(6):86–96.

Published

2021-06-22

Versions

2021-06-23 (2)
2021-06-22 (1)

How to Cite

Adanta, D., Prakoso, A. P., & Sari, D. P. (2021). Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics Method for Cross-flow Turbine in Pico Scale. Journal of Energy, Mechanical, Material, and Manufacturing Engineering, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/jemmme.v6i1.12813

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).