Effects of leading-edge defects of the NACA 0015 airfoil on aerodynamic performance with various Reynolds number

Authors

  • Ulfa Hanifah Nurhaliza Universitas Pembanguan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • James Julian Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Fitri Wahyuni Universitas Pembanguan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Waridho Iskandar Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jemmme.v8i2.29400

Keywords:

NACA 0015, CFD simulation, Reynold numbers, defect airfoil, aerodynamic forces

Abstract

This study investigates and identifies the effects produced by defect on an airfoil when compared to a smooth airfoil. The defect used in this research is of the surface concaved defect (SDD) type, with a deep defect characterized by a smooth sunken deformation. The opening size used is t*=12%, and the equivalent depth of the defect is h*=3%. Computational methods are being used in this research to analyzing flow of the fluid through the NACA 0015 airfoil, both in smooth and defective airfoil, with various Reynolds Number which are 1.6×106, 2×106, and 2.5×106. Standard k-epsilon model is being used in this research as turbulence model. For the smooth airfoil, stall conditions occur at an AoA of 11º, while for the defective airfoil, they occur at an AoA of 9^° for each Re variation. The average decrease in the Cl/Cd ratio from smooth airfoil to defective airfoil at each AoA for all Re variations is 33%. There is an increase in pressure on the upperside leading edge of defective airfoil for all Re values. Based on the velocity streamlines, vortices can be found at the defect cavity, and the vortex at the defective airfoil seems larger than the smooth airfoil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kumar Y, Ringenberg J, Depuru SS, Devabhaktuni VK, Lee JW, Nikolaidis E, et al. Wind energy: Trends and enabling technologies. Vol. 53, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier Ltd; 2016. p. 209–24.

Zhang S, Dam-Johansen K, Nørkjær S, Bernad PL, Kiil S. Erosion of wind turbine blade coatings - Design and analysis of jet-based laboratory equipment for performance evaluation. Prog Org Coat. 2015 Jan 1;78:103–15.

Conan B, van Beeck J, Aubrun S. Sand erosion technique applied to wind resource assessment. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2012;104–106:322–9.

Wang Y, Hu R, Zheng X. Aerodynamic Analysis of an Airfoil With Leading Edge Pitting Erosion. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Transactions of the ASME. 2017 Dec 1;139(6).

Ge M, Zhang H, Wu Y, Li Y. Effects of leading edge defects on aerodynamic performance of the S809 airfoil. Energy Convers Manag. 2019 Sep 1;195:466–79.

Wang Y, Zheng X, Hu R, Wang P. Effects of leading edge defect on the aerodynamic and flow characteristics of an s809 Airfoil. PLoS One. 2016 Sep 1;11(9).

Sareen A, Sapre CA, Selig MS. Effects of leading edge erosion on wind turbine blade performance. Wind Energy. 2014;17(10):1531–42.

Gad-El-Hak M. Reynolds number effects in wall-bounded turbulent flows [Internet]. 1994. Available from: http://appliedmechanicsreviews.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/

Lissaman PBS. LOW-REYNOLDS-NUMBER AIRFOILS [Internet]. Vol. 15, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1983. Available from: www.annualreviews.org

Islam Rubel R, Uddin K, Islam Z. Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Aerodynamics Characteristics of NACA 0015 Aerofoil. Vol. 2, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES Robiul Islam Rubel et al. 2016.

Julian J, Iskandar W, Wahyuni F. COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSIS BASED ON THE FLUID FLOW SEPARATION POINT ON THE UPPER SIDE OF THE NACA 0015 AIRFOIL WITH THE COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION. Jurnal Media Mesin. 23(2).

Seeni AS, Rajendran P. Numerical validation of NACA 0009 airfoil in ultra-low reynolds number flows. International Review of Aerospace Engineering. 2019;12(2):83–92.

Iskandar W, Julian J, Wahyuni F, Ferdyanto, Prabu HK, Yulia F. Study of Airfoil Characteristics on NACA 4415 with Reynolds Number Variations. International Review on Modelling and Simulations. 2022;15(3):162–71.

Megawanto FC, Harinaldi, Budiarso, Julian J. Numerical analysis of plasma actuator for drag reduction and lift enhancement on NACA 4415 airfoil. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics Inc.; 2018.

Minh Triet N, Ngoc Viet N, Manh Thang P. Aerodynamic Analysis of Aircraft Wing. Vol. 31, VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics-Physics. 2015.

Gharali K, Johnson DA. Numerical modeling of an S809 airfoil under dynamic stall, erosion and high reduced frequencies. Appl Energy. 2012;93:45–52.

Kekina P, Suvanjumrat C. A Comparative Study on Turbulence Models for Simulation of Flow Past NACA 0015 Airfoil Using OpenFOAM.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Nurhaliza, U. H., Julian, J., Wahyuni, F., & Iskandar, W. (2023). Effects of leading-edge defects of the NACA 0015 airfoil on aerodynamic performance with various Reynolds number. Journal of Energy, Mechanical, Material, and Manufacturing Engineering, 8(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.22219/jemmme.v8i2.29400

Issue

Section

Articles