Corrosion rate of anodized AA 7075-T651 on H2SO4 electrolyte and vVoltage variation

Authors

  • Moch. Syamsul Ma'arif Brawijaya University
  • Muhammad Noviandari Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Rudy Soenoko Mechanical Engineering Department, Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jemmme.v8i2.29717

Keywords:

corrosion, pore size, tavel test, voltage, sulfuric acid

Abstract

Metal materials corrode because of an electrochemical process that damages or destroys them gradually. In addition to chemical reactions, high temperatures, mechanical operations, and rainfall exposure can all lead to corrosion. It is an experimental study with variation of voltage for AA 7075-T651. The voltage variation between 4 and 5 and 6 volts is the independent variable employed in this study. The rate of corrosion and the size of the pores are the dependent variables. One amp of current, thirty millimeters between the anode and cathode, one millimeter of sulfuric acid as the electrolyte concentration, and ten minutes of anodizing time are the controlled variables in this study. Variation in voltage throughout the anodizing process can regulate how quickly corrosion occurs via the oxide layer that is created. The 7075-T651 series aluminum alloy, when subjected to action anodizing at different voltages of 4 volts, 5 volts, and 6 volts, yields pore diameters measuring 0.273 μm, 0.436 μm, and 0.522 μm, respectively, according to SEM picture data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. F. Mondolfo, “Al–Zn Aluminum–Zinc system,” in Aluminum Alloys, Elsevier, 1976, pp. 398–413.

Zhou et al., “Promoted Anodizing Reaction and Enhanced Coating Performance of Al–11Si Alloy: The Role of an Equal-Channel-Angular-Pressed Substrate,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 19, p. 3255, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3390/ma12193255.

M. S. Ma’arif, M. Y. Febriyanto, and R. Soenoko, “Pengaruh Konsentrasi Elektrolit Asam Sitrat (C6H8O7) terhadap Laju Korosi Aluminium 2024 Hasil Proses Anodizing,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teahunan Teknik Mesin XX, 2022, p. 5, [Online]. Available: http://prosiding.bkstm.org/prosiding/2022/RM-004.pdf.

I. S. Aisyah, S. Sudarman, Handrianto, and D. A. Maulana Putra, “Characterization of Copper Deposit on Electroplating of AISI 1024 Steel,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi dan Rekayasa (SENTRA) 2016, 2016, p. 16, [Online]. Available: http://research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/sentra/article/view/1785.

R. Soenoko, P. H. Setyarini, S. Hidaytullah, M. S. Ma’arif, and F. Gapsari, “Corrosion Characterization of Cu-based Alloy in Different Environment,” METALURGIJA, vol. 59, pp. 373–376, 2020, [Online]. Available: corrosion, Cu alloys, HNO3 , NaCl, NaOH.

P. H. Setyarini, “Pengaruh Tegangan pada Proses Anodisasi Terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan dan Ukuran Pori,” in Prosiding SENIATI 2018, 2018, pp. 176–180, doi: https://doi.org/10.36040/seniati.v4i2.1309.

M. P. B, M. I. A, L. S. K, and B. I. G., “Effect of Anodization on the corrosion behavior of Aluminium Alloy in HCl acid and NaOH,” Int. J. Mater. Eng., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 38–42, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.5923/j.ijme.20120204.02.

I. Fontinha and E. Eustáquio, “Influence of Exposure Conditions and Particulate Deposition on Anodized Aluminum Corrosion,” Corros. Mater. Degrad., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 770–786, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/cmd3040040.

J. L. Trompette, L. Arurault, S. Fontorbes, and L. Massot, “Influence of the anion specificity on the electrochemical corrosion of anodized aluminum substrates,” Electrochim. Acta, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 2901–2910, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.12.063.

L. F. Lin, C. Y. Chao, and D. D. Macdonald, “A Point Defect Model for Anodic Passive Films: II . Chemical Breakdown and Pit Initiation,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 1194–1198, Jun. 1981, doi: 10.1149/1.2127592.

G. . Thompson, “Porous anodic alumina: fabrication, characterization and applications,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 297, no. 1–2, pp. 192–201, Apr. 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(96)09440-0.

C. A. Melendres, S. Van Gils, and H. Terryn, “Toward a quantitative description of the anodic oxide films on aluminum,” Electrochem. commun., vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 737–741, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S1388-2481(01)00250-8.

D. Purnama, J. W. Soedarsono, Y. Sadeli, and R. Riastuti, “Pengaruh perubahan tegangan dan temperatur terhadap pembentukan pori pada aluminium foil dengan metoda anodisasi sederhana dalam larutan asam asetat 0.2 M,” Universitas Indonesia, 2009.

F. Nugroho, “PENGARUH RAPAT ARUS ANODIZING TERHADAP NILAI KEKERASAN PADA PLAT ALUMINIUM PADUAN AA SERI 2024-T3,” Angkasa J. Ilm. Bid. Teknol., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 39, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.28989/angkasa.v7i2.147.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Ma’arif, M. S., Noviandari, M., & Soenoko, R. (2023). Corrosion rate of anodized AA 7075-T651 on H2SO4 electrolyte and vVoltage variation. Journal of Energy, Mechanical, Material, and Manufacturing Engineering, 8(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.22219/jemmme.v8i2.29717

Issue

Section

Articles