The Determinants of Tax Volunteer Performance


  • Rosalita Rachma Agusti Universitas Brawijaya
  • Hanifa Maulani Ramadhan Universitas Brawijaya



Task performance, Adaptive performance, Contextual performance, Counterproductive work behavior, tax volunteer


Taxes have a vital role in Indonesian revenues. The contribution of tax revenues in the 2019 State Budget structure was 82.5 percent of Indonesia's total revenue. The tax authorities in Indonesia strive to support the achievement of tax revenue targets, among others, through the tax volunteer program. Based on the individual performance theory applied to the tax sector, this study measured adaptive performance, contextual performance, task performance, and counterproductive work behavior. A quantitative method was used in this research. It was conducted on tax volunteers who assisted in tax reporting by individual income taxpayers which were analysed by using PLS. The result was that task performance has become the dominant factor of tax volunteer’s performance. By using tax performance, it can evaluate tax volunteer performance and make designs to upgrade their quality.


Download data is not yet available.


Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt N, Borman WC, eds. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 71–98.

Calabrese, R. L. and Schumer, H. 1986. The effects of service activities on adolescent alienation. Adolescence, Vol. 21, pp.675-687

Campbell JP. 1990. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In: Dunnette MD, Hough LM, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 687–732.

Freeman, R.B. 1997. Working for nothing: the supply of volunteer labor. Journal of Labor Economics. Vol. 15 Nos 1/2, pp. S140-S66.

Griffin MA, Neal A, Parker SK. 2007. A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad Manag J. 50:327–347.

Kemppila S, Lonnqvist A. 2003. Subjective productivity measurement. J Am Acad Business. Vol. 2:531–537.

Koopmans, Linda, et. al. 2011. Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance. JOEM. Vol. 5 No. 8, August 2011

Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. 2018. Pembelajaran Kesadaran Pajak pada Sistim Pendidikan Nasional.

Murphy KR. Dimensions of job performance. I1989. n: Dillon RF, Pellegrino JW, eds. Testing: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives. New York: Praeger; 218–247.

President’s Task Force on Private Sector Initiatives. 1982. Building Partnerships.

Pulakos, E.D., Arad, S., Donovan, M.A., Plamondon, K.E., 2000. Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 85 (4), 612–624.

Rotundo M, Sackett PR. 2002. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of performance: a policy- capturing approach. J Appl Psychol. 87:66–80.

Viswesvaran C, Ones DS. 2000. Perspectives on models of job performance. Int J Select Assessm. 8:216–226.

Wilson, J. 2000. “Volunteering”. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 26, pp. 215-40