Local and international prospective teachers’ perception on collaborative learning

Authors

  • Alimin Adi Waloyo University of Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Santi Prastiyowati University of Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Ummu Artha Tsary Rumalessin University of Muhammadiyah Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/jppg.v1i2.12477

Keywords:

Perception, Prospective teachers’, International students, Collaborative learning,

Abstract

Many EFL learners show higher achievement, feel more satisfied with their learning experiences, and display higher motivation to develop their English when they are engaged in collaborative learning. However, others display lack of contribution, low commitment, bad time management, and passive membership during the collaboration with other learners. In this case, teachers’ role is paramount to provide constructive feedback and supervise the learners to eliminate these potential issues. This research was conducted by involving both local and international EFL students in Indonesian context and addressed how local and international students of English Education at University of Muhammadiyah Malang (UMM) perceived group assignment. The research involved 7 international (Thai) students and 7 local (Indonesian) students, studying at English Education of UMM, academic year 2015. The instruments were questionnaires (likert scale and open-ended questions) and interview, which were anayzed using both quantitavie and qualitative method.This mixed method helped the researchers obtain comprehensive data and required information. The classified data was analyzed by calculating each item using descriptive statistic for close ended questions and descriptive interpretation for open ended questions and interview items. The investigation found that the students completely realized the positive effects of group work advancing their academic performance and developing their personal attitudes. Therefore, applying collaborative learning as a part of teaching activity in EFL context is highly encouraged to help learners perform better both academically and individually.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. London: Cengage Learning. Retrieved from http://www.modares.ac.ir/uploads/Agr.Oth. Lib.12.pdf

Beebe, S. A., & Masterson, J. T. (2012). Chapter of Communicating in small groups: principles and practices. Communicating in Small Groups, 1–31. Retrieved from https://www.pearson. com/us/higher-education/program/Beebe-Revel-forCommunicating-in-Small-Groups-Principles-and-Practices-Access-Card-12th-Edition

Bentley, Y., & Warwick, S. (2013). An investigation into students’ perceptions of group assignments. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 23(3), 11–8. Retrieved from https://www.beds.ac.uk/jpd/volume-3-issue-3/an-investigation-into-students-perceptions-of-group-assignments

Burke, A. (2011). Group work: How to use groups effectively. Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2), 87–95. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1092109.pdf

Chen, Y. (2018). Perceptions of EFL College Students toward Collaborative Learning. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 1-4. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1164 588.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (pp. 146-166). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Daba, T. M., Ejersa, S. J., & Aliyi, S. (2017). Student perception on group work and group assignments in classroom teaching: the case of Bule Hora University second year biology students, South Ethiopia. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(17), 860–866. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.3006

Forehand, J. W., Leigh, K. H., Farrell, R. G., & Spurlock, A. Y. (2016). Social dynamics in group work. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 11(2), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2015. 12.007

Hassanien, A. (2006). Student experience of group work and group assessment in higher education. Journal of teaching in travel & tourism, 6(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/ 10.5897/ERR2016.3006

Ho, F. F., & Boo, H. K. (2007). Cooperative learning: Exploring its effectiveness in the Physics classroom. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/

Huang, X. and Hu, X. (2016). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of classroom activities commonly used in english speaking classes. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 87–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n1p87

Jacobs, G. M. (2006). Issues in implementing cooperative learning. In G. M. Jacobs, S. G. McCafferty & A. C. DaSilva Iddings (Eds.), Cooperative learning and second language teaching (pp. 30-46). New York: Cambridge University Press

James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities. Melbourne.: The University of Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education.

Jameson, T. (2013). Attitudes towards English in relation to English as a Lingua Franca in the Tanzanian Context. MA Thesis. Retrieved from http://englishagenda.britishcouncil. org/research-papers

Jeong, K. O. (2016). A study on the integration of Google Docs as a web-based collaborative learning platform in EFL writing instruction. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(39), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i39/103239

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2000). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834

Jung, I., Kudo, M., & Choi, S. K. (2012). Stress in Japanese learners engaged in online collaborative learning in English. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1016-1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01271.x

Kudek, D. (2016). Self-chosen student groups - what is the student impact if one is not part of his/her ideal team? International Journal of Teaching & Education, 4(2), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2016.4.2.004

Li, M., & Campbell, J. (2008). Asian students’ perceptions of group work and group assignments in a New Zealand tertiary institution. Intercultural Education, 19(3), 203–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980802078525

Li, M. P., & Lam, B. H. (2013). Cooperative learning. The Hong Kong Institute of Education, 1–3. Retrieved from https://www.eduhk.hk/aclass/Theories/cooperativelearningcoursewri ting_LBH%2024June.pdf

Marks, M. B., & O’Connor, A. H. (2013). Understanding students’ sttitudes about group work: What does this suggest for instructors of business? Journal of Education for Business, 88(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.664579

Moore, P., & Hampton, G. (2015). “It”s a bit of a generalisation, but …’: participant perspectives on intercultural group assessment in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.919437

Momtaz, E., & Garner, M. (2010). Does collaborative learning improve EFL students’ reading comprehension? Journal of linguistics and language teaching, 1(1), 15-36. https://linguisticsandlanguageteaching.blogspot.com/2010/05/journal-of-linguistics-and-language.html

Öntaş, Ö. C., & Tekindal, M. T. (2015). The Effect of group work on the self-efficacy of social work students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(1), 1124–1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.804

Porter, J. Y. (2006). Using learning communities to enhance counselling curriculum. Vistas 2006 Online. Retrieved from https://www.counseling.org/resources/library/VISTAS/ vistas06_online-only/Porter.pdf

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behaviour Edition 15. New Jearsey: Pearson Education.

Roskams, T. (1999). Chinese EFL students' attitudes to peer feedback and peer assessment in an extended pairwork setting. RELC Journal, 30(1), 79-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 003368829903000105

Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 52(1), 119-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179

Downloads

Published

2020-08-01

Issue

Section

Articles