Penerapan model pembelajaran mind mapping untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA kelas 5
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jppg.v1i3.14299Keywords:
Model Pembelajaran Mind mapping, IPA, Hasil BelajarAbstract
Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui proses penerapan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping pada mata pelajaran IPA tentang ekosistem di kelas V SDN 2 Basuhan dan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA tentang ekosistem pada siswa kelas V SDN 2 Basuhan melalui penerapan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK). Subjek penelitian ini adalah peneliti dan siswa kelas V SDN 2 Basuhan sebanyak 7 orang yang terdiri dari 2 laki-laki dan 5 perempuan. Data diperoleh melalui teknik tes, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis data deskriptif kualitatif dengan cara membandingkan hasil pree test dan post test. Tindakan ini dilakukan hanya dalam 1 siklus dengan 1 kali kegiatan pembelajaran. Dari tindakan perbaikan pada siklus I hasil belajar siswa telah mencapai indikator keberhasilan dengan kategori baik. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian yaitu terjadi peningkatan hasil belajar IPA melalui penerapan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping pada siswa Kelas V SDN 2 Basuhan.
Application of the Mind Mapping Learning Model to Improve Science Learning Outcomes for Grade 5. The purpose of this study is to determine the application of learning models Mind Mapping in natural sciences studies about the ekosistem in class V SDN 2 Basuhan and to improve learning outcomes IPA about ekosistem fourth grade students of SDN 2 Basuhan through the application of learning models Mind Mapping. The approach used in this study is a qualitative approach using classroom action research (CAR). The subjects were researchers and fourth grade students of SDN 2 Basuhan, as many as 7 people consisting of 2 men and 5 women. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative data analysis by comparing the results of the pre-test and post-test. This action is carried out only in 1 cycle with 1 learning activity. From the corrective action in cycle I, student learning outcomes have reached the indicators of success with good categories. The conclusion of the research results is that there is an increase in science learning outcomes through the application of the Mind Mapping learning model in Class V SDN 2 Basuhan students
Downloads
References
Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of Medical Library Association, 103(3), 152–153. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010
Afrianto Daud. (2018). Being a professional teacher in the era of industrial revolution 4.0: opportunities, challenges and strategies for innovative classroom practices. English Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 1–14. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/eltar/article/view/102675
Aldarmono, A. (2015). Pendekatan Edutainment Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Sd. Al-Mabsut: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 9(2), 61–75. http://iaingawi.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/almabsut/article/view/73
As’ari, A. (2016). Using Mind Maps as a Teaching and Learning Tool to Promote Student Engagement. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32678/loquen.v10i01.25
Dewantara, D. (2019). Improving Students’ Learning Outcome: Implementaton Mind Mapping Method With Goconqr. Jurnal Pena Sains, 6(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.21107/jps.v6i2.6017
Gleason, N. W. (2018). Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0
Hogue, M. . (2016). Three domains of learning: Cognitive, affective and psychomotor. The Journal of EFL Education and Research, 2(2), 45–52.
Hutauruk, B. S. (2015). Levels of Cognition in Reading Text National Examination Year 2005-2011 Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of English Language and Culture, 5(2), 107–122.
Karo, R. K., Perangin-Angin, R. B. B., & Murad, A. (2020). The Effect of STAD Cooperative Learning Model and Critical Thinking Ability on Learning Outcomes PPKn Grade V Students of SD Negeri 060934 Medan Johor. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.959
Khoerunnisa, P., & Aqwal, S. M. (2020). Analisis Model-model Pembelajaran. Fondatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v4i1.441
Naomee, I., & Tithi, U. M. (2013). Reflection of Blooms Taxonomy in the Learning Outcomes of Secondary Social Science Curriculum of Bangladesh. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2(2), 550–559. https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v2i2/IJSRON2013364.pdf
Permana, A. R. Y., Wulansari, H., & Kelana, J. B. (2018). Effortts To Improve Science Learning Outcomes Using Demonstration Methods. Journal of Elementary Education, 01(05), 298–305.
Purwanto, H., Hamka, D., Ramadhani, W., Mulya, D., Suri, F., & Novaliza, M. (2020). Problematics study of natural sciences (IPA) online at junior high school in the time of the pandemic Covid-19. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 21(2), 188–195.
Rafiei, N., & Davari, F. (2015). The role of human resources management on enhancing the teaching skills of faculty members. Materia Socio-Medica, 27(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.27.35-38
Rizal, A. S., & Syaifulloh, A. (2021). Student corner learning construction at MTs-Ma al-Qur’an La Raiba Hanifida Jombang. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 2(4), 330–346.
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-10-2016-0007
Sulthon, S. (2017). Pembelajaran IPA yang Efektif dan Menyenangkan bagi Siswa MI. ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal, 4(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v4i1.1969
Suyanto, A. (2015). The Effectiveness of Mindmapping in Improving Students’ Writing Skill Viewed from Their IQ. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 2(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v2i2.3089
Syauki, A. Y., Wardana, B., & Maulina, S. (2021). The implementation of mind mapping strategy on students’ speaking ability (literature study). TULIP (Tulisan Ilmiah Pendidikan), 10(2), 101–109.
Wibowo, W. S. (2019). The Natural Environment As a Learning Source for Science: Implementation Strategy. Journal of Science Education Research, 3(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v3i1.27629
Zipp, G. P. (2011). Using Mind Maps as a Teaching and Learning Tool to Promote Student Engagement - Faculty Focus | Higher Ed Teaching & Learning. Faculty Focus | Higher Ed Teaching & Learning. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-and-learning/using-mind-maps-as-a-teaching-and-learning-tool-to-promote-student-engagement/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nurhayati Nurhayati, Ima Wahyu Putri Utami, Elia Rovi Luddi Anoffa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
