Meningkatkan Ketrampilan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi (HOTS) Dan Keterlibatan Mahasiswa Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jch.v8i1.24390Keywords:
Socratic Method , HOTs , Student engagementAbstract
Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) as an essential requirement in facing the challenges of chapter 21. This research aims to increase HOTS and student involvement in the learning process. The Socratic Method (Socrated Method) prioritizes in-depth discussion or dialogue (deep dialoque), where learning (teacher/lecturer) conveys deep questions (deep quitning) encourages students to think at a higher level. The Socratic method also encourages students to be actively involved in the learning process. This classroom action research uses 3 (three) cycles of steps; 1) problem assistance, 2) action plan, 3) action evaluation. The subjects were 29 students who took Pancasila Education lectures. The results showed that after 3 (three) cycles of action, HOTS increased by 45%. While student involvement has increased by 59%. So it can be said that the Socratic method can increase HOTS and student involvement in the lecture process.
Downloads
References
Anderson and Krathwohl. (2001). A Model of Learning Objectives based on A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
Australian Council for Educational Research. (2010). Doing more for learning : enhancing engagement and outcomes : Australasian survey of student engagement : Australasian student engagement report.
Boghossian, P. (2012). Socratic Pedagogy: Perplexity, humiliation, shame and a broken egg. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(7), 710–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00773.x
B.Baowollo, R. (2022). VUCA, Disruption, Leadership, And 21’St Century Learning Skills. Eposdigi. https://www.eposdigi.com/2022/05/16/opini/vuca-disruption-leadership-and-21st-century-learning-skills/
Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V. E., Hounsell, J., & McCune, V. (2008). “A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions”: Learning to be a university student. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802373040
Cojocariu, V.-M., & Butnaru, C.-E. (2014). Asking Questions – Critical Thinking Tools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.112
Collins, R. (2014). Skills for the 21st Century: teaching higher-order thinking. Curriculum and Leadership Journa, 12(14).
Coulter, A., Parsons, S., & Askham, J. (2008). Where are the patients in decision-making about their own care? http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest
Dian NF. (2021, November 1). Taksonomi Bloom: Model Dalam Merumuskan Tujuan Pembelajaran. Curriculum and Leadership Journa.
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2005). The Miniature Guide to The Art of Asking Essential Questions Based on Critical Thinking Concepts and Socratic Principles The Foundation for Critical Thinking. www.criticalthinking.org
Elgawaty, G. (2020). (SKRIPSI) PENERAPAN METODE SOCRATES DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PPKN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS PESERTA DIDIK (Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Terhadap Kelas XI IPS 2 SMA Pasundan 8 Bandung) SKRIPSI.
Fernando M. Reimers. (2021). Implementing Deeper Learning and 21st Education Reforms (Fernando M. Reimers, Ed.; Open Access). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57039-2
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence (Vol. 74, Nomor 1).
Furlong, M. J. , A. D. W. G. St. J. J. S. A. S. and S. P. (2003). Multiple Contexts of School Engagement: Moving Toward a Unifying Framework for Educational Research and Practice. 8, 99–113. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03340899
Ghamrawi, N., Ghamrawi, N. A. R., & Shal, T. (2017). Lebanese Public Schools: 20<sup>th</sup> or 21<sup>st</sup> Century Schools? An Investigation into Teachers’ Instructional Practices. Open Journal of Leadership, 06(01), 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2017.61001
Grace, A. P., & Gouthro, P. A. (2000). Using models of feminist pedagogies to think about issues and directions in graduate education for women students. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695714
Gregory, E., Hardiman, M., Yarmolinskaya, J., Rinne, L., & Limb, C. (2013). Building creative thinking in the classroom: From research to practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.06.003
Griffiths, D. S., Winstanley, D., & Gabriel, Y. (2005). Learning shock: The trauma of return to formal learning. Dalam Management Learning (Vol. 36, Nomor 3, hlm. 275–297). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507605055347
Halpern, D. E. (1998). Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer Across Domains Dispositions, Skills, Structure Training, and Metacognitive Monitoring.
Hannel, I. (2009). Insufficient Questioning. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909100341
Hartini, H., Harmi, H., Fadila, F., Wahyudi M, E., & Warlizasusi, J. (2020). Expressing the level of curiosity of students studying in college. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 8(2), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.29210/148100
Heong, Y. Mei. dkk. (2011). The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Education Students. nternational Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 121–125.
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Kahu, E., Stephens, C., Leach, L., & Zepke, N. (2015). Linking academic emotions and student engagement: mature-aged distance students’ transition to university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.895305
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Dalam The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2010). Developing higher level thinking. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1097083.pdf
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The Psychology of Curiosity: A Review and Reinterpretation. Dalam Psychological Bulletin (Vol. 116, Nomor 1).
Mann, S. J. (2001). Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience: Alienation and engagement. Dalam Studies in Higher Education (Vol. 26, Nomor 1). Carfax Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070020030689
Nappi, J. S. (2017). The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin: International Journal for Professional Educators.
N.S. Rajendran. (2021). Teaching & Acquiring Higher-Order Thinking Skills: Theory & Practice. Penerbit UPSI (Penerbit UPSI).
Ramos, J. L., & Dolipas, B. (2019). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance in Physics of College Students: A Regression Analysis. http://education.qld.gov.au/corporate/newbasics/html/pedagogies/intellect/int1a.html
Sophia, S., Remark, A. A., & Ewing, E. M. (2015). Use of High-Level Questioning to Increase Student Achievement Use of High-Level Questioning to Increase Student Achievement in Reading in Reading. https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/127
Sorvatzioti, D. F. (2012). THE SOCRATIC METHOD OF TEACHING IN A MULTIDISCIPLINARY EDUCATIONAL
SETTING. Dalam International Journal of Arts & Sciences (Nomor 5).B.Baowollo, R. (2022). VUCA, Disruption, Leadership, And 21’St Century Learning Skills. Eposdigi. https://www.eposdigi.com/2022/05/16/opini/vuca-disruption-leadership-and-21st-century-learning-skills/
Elgawaty, G. (2020). (SKRIPSI) PENERAPAN METODE SOCRATES DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PPKN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS PESERTA DIDIK (Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Terhadap Kelas XI IPS 2 SMA Pasundan 8 Bandung) SKRIPSI.
Sasmita, W., Andyastuti, E., & Widodo, A. (2021). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran “Debat” Melalui (Spada) Mata Kuliah Ilmu Negara Untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Mahasiswa. Prosiding SEMDIKJAR …, 864–873. https://proceeding.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/semdikjar/article/view/2323%0Ahttps://proceeding.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/semdikjar/article/download/2323/1356
Ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: Teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.005
Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: The role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17(4), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930210140257
Tienken, C. H., Goldberg, S., & Dirocco, D. (2009). Questioning the Questions. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 46(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2009.10516690
Widodo, A., Nursalim, & Pristiani, Y. D. (2019). Meningkatkan Keterlibatan Siswa Dalam Proses Pembelajaran dan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Pada Mata Pelajaran PPKn Dengan Metode Seminar Socrates. Prosiding SEMDIKJAR (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran) Semdikjar 3, 3, 135–142.
Widodo, A., Suratman, & Nursalim. (2022). KORELASI KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI DENGAN PEMAHAMAN IDENTITAS NASIONAL DAN SIKAP NASIONALISME. 03, 1–7.
Zubaidah, S. (2016). Simas eric learning model View project Research-based on Herbs Exploration and Use of Animal Models : Nature Materials Towards Supporting Evidence Based Medicine View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318013627
Zulvarina, P., Saraswati, D., & Anggraeni F., N. (2022). Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan. Jurnal: Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, Volume 7(Nomor 2), hlm: 507-515. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jppk
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Agus Widodo, Zainal Afandi, Suratman Suratman, Nursalim Nursalim, Etty Andyastuti, Septiana Septiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licensethat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
