Prenuptial Agreements and Power Relations of Husbands and Wives among Javanese Society
Keywords:
prenuptial agreement, power relations, marriage, gender equalityAbstract
Javanese still adheres to a patriarchal culture and has the concept of family harmony so that prenuptial agreements are considered as a form of unethical openness that demonstrates a lack of trust in their partners. This study focuses on the meaning of prenuptial agreements and the power relations between husband and wife who enter into prenuptial agreements. This study employed a qualitative research method by conducting in-depth interviews with men and women who made prenuptial agreements. The theory used was phenomenology. This study revealed that prenuptial agreement was defined by various experiences, situations, and personalities of the couple. A prenuptial agreement is not intended to be used to plan a divorce. Pre-nuptial agreement users want a marriage that has protection and freedom. The upper class interprets a prenuptial agreement as a means of protecting property and assets owned, avoiding losses caused by a spouse, and making it easier to run a business. Meanwhile, the middle class interprets prenuptial agreements as a means of self-protection that leads to a guarantee of personal safety over shared assets and other obligations to children fairly in the event of a household conflict. The power relations between husband and wife who enter into prenuptial agreements demonstrate various forms, including: 1) sexist power, 2) female domination, and 3) an equal relationship. This study concludes that Javanese who enters into prenuptial agreements uphold the concept of living in harmony but reject the concept of “surrendering”. Prenuptial agreements are used as: 1) a means of self-protection with security guarantees; the anticipation of the uncertainty of what will happen in the future or the unpredictable in the marriage; and 3) freedom that comes from experience and awareness.
Keywords: prenuptial agreement, power relations, marriage, gender equality
Downloads
References
Akbar, A. D. (2008). Perjanjian Pra Nikah: Solusi Bagi Wanita. Yinyang, 3(1), 140-151.
Anggraini, N. F. (2015). Kajian Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan di Kalangan WNI Islam (Studi di Kota Medan). Thesis, Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Blair, S. L., & Lichter, D. T. (1991). Measuring the division of household labor. Journal of Family Issues, 12(1), 91–113.
Fajar, Muhamad Irsan. (2021). Perjanjian kawin yang di buat setelah berlangsungnya perkawinan menurut perspektif hukum positif dan hukum Islam. Thesis, UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
Geertz, H. (1961). The Javanese Family. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Hariati, Sri, & Salat, Musakir. (2013). The injustice of distributing marital property (harga gini gono) in divorce cases. Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 1(3), 448-463.
Ida, R. (2001). The construction of gender identity in indonesia: between cultural norms, economic implications, and state formation. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik.
Ifemeje. (2010). A case for global enforceable prenuptial agreements. Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, 1, 151-157.
Israel, Laurie. (2007). The Art of the Prenup-Use Sparingly. Retrieved from Israel Van Kooy Law, LLC: https://ivkdlaw.com/the-firm/our-articles/prenuptial-agreements-and-lawyering/the-art-of-the-prenup-—-use-sparingly/.
Karolina. (2012). Makna Perjanjian Perkawinan Menurut Adat Dayak Ngaju, Kalimantan Tengah. Thesis, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
Kualaria, Sulikah. (2015). Perjanjian perkawinan sebagai sarana perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak dalam perkawinan. Thesis, Universitas Brawijaya.
Koentjaraningrat. (1985). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.
Marston, Allison A. (1997). Planning for love the politics of prenuptial agreements. Stanford Law Review, 49(4), 887-916.
Maslow, Abaraham. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
Mas'udah, S. (2021). Power Relations of Husbands and Wives Experiencing Domestic Violence in Dual-Career Families in Indonesia. Millennial Asia. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996211039730.
Muchsin. 2008. Perjanjian Perkawinan Dalam Persfektif Hukum Nasional. Penerbit Varia Peradilan.
Ningrum, W. T. P. & Mas’udah, S. (2021). Family conflicts and the violence of unemployed husbands against their wives acting as the main breadwinner. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika 16 (1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v16i1.2021.76-85.
Resu, Silsia. (2016). Akibat hukum perjanjian kawin terhadap harta perkawinan. Thesis, Universitas Andalas.
Rustina. (2014). Keluarga dalam kajian sosiologi. Musawa, 6(2), 287-322.
Scanzoni, Letha D & Scanzoni, Jhon. (1981). Men, Women, and Change: A Sociology of Marriage and Family. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Schutz, Alfred. (1972). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Heinemann Educational Books, London.
Sella, Pramei FA. (2020). Makna sosial pernikahan di kalangan perempuan pekerja profesional yang bercerai. Thesis, Universitas Airlangga.
Soetojo, Prawirohamidjojo. (1988). Pluralisme Dalam Perundang-undangan Perkawinan di Indonesia. Airlangga University Press, Surabaya.
Syarifah, Khanna. (2019). Perjanjian pra nikah di Indonesia perspektif maqasid syariah jasser auda. Thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Thagaard, Tove (1997). Gender, Power, and Love: A Study of Interaction between Spouses. Acta Sociologica, 40(4), 357–376.
Taormina, &. G. (2013). Maslow and the motivation hierarchy; measuring satisfaction of the needs. The American Journal of Psychology, 126(2), 155-177.
Wattie, A. M. (2010). Relasi kuasa dalam rumah tangga poligami: Studi kasus pada sebuah rumah tangga, di Banguntapan Bantul, Yogyakarta. Thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Zahavi, S. O. (2009). Phenomenological Sociology. Encountering the everyday: An introduction to the sociologies of the unnoticed, 93-115.
Zeitlin, Marian F. (1995). Strengthening the family - Implications for international development. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 15(4).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Partisipatoris agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in the Jurnal partisipatoris, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the automatic transfer of non-exclusive publishing rights to the publisher.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
