Modalitas sebagai fitur lingual praktik kuasa dalam komunitas pedofilia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v7i2.17682Keywords:
Analisis wacana kritis, Komunitas pedofilia, Modalitas, Praktik kuasaAbstract
Kemunculan modalitas sebagai fitur lingual yang menunjukkan praktik kuasa pelaku kejahatan dalam komunitas pedofilia terhadap proposisi yang mereka tuturkan atau sikap terhadap pendengar. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengungkapkan praktik kuasa pelaku kejahatan dalam komunitas pedofilia melalui modalitas. Sesuai dengan tujuan tersebut, penelitian ini adalah analisis wacana kritis. Data penelitian ini berupa kata yang diperoleh selama observasi netnografi online partisipan di komunitas pedofilia. Data yang diperoleh selama observasi netnografi online didokumentasikan dalam bentuk pengarsipan digital dan dicatat dalam bentuk field note untuk dianalisis. Analisis modalitas dalam penelitian ini menggunakan model dimensi analisis wacana kritis (AWK) Fairclough berupa deksripsi, interpretasi, dan eksplanasi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dalam komunitas pedofilia terdapat praktik kuasa yang dilakukan oleh pelaku kejahatan dengan menggunakan kata kerja modal linguistik. Temuan dari penelitian ini adanya modalitas sebagai fitur lingual praktik kuasa yang meliputi (1) nilai relasional modalitas yang ditandai dengan menggunakan modal mungkin, akan, dan bisa, dan (2) nilai ekspresif modalitas diungkapkan dengan menggunakan modal harus. Simpulan penelitian ini dari analisis kritis terhadap nilai relasional modalitas dan nilai ekspresif modalitas terdapat praktik kuasa sebagai konstruksi realitas sosial dari komunitas pedofilia.
Downloads
References
Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Akdeniz, Y. (1997). Regulation of child pornography on the internet: Cases and Material. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/law/pgs/yaman/child.htm
Alwi, H. (1992). Modalitas dalam bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Azar, B. S. (2002). Understanding and using english grammar. 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Pearson Education Limited.
Dajem, Z.A.S dan Hesham, S. A. (2020). An analysis of mood and modality in workplace discourse and the impact of power differentials: Ramsay’s kitchen nightmares. Advances in Language and LiteraryStudies, 11(4), 46–61. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.4p.48
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (2020). Markers of epistemic modality and their origins: Evidence from two unrelated sign languages. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19065.eng
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity. Press.
Fairclough, Norman. (1989). Language and power. Edinburgh: Longman Group UK Limited.
Fedoroff, J.P. (2020). The Pedophilia and orientation debate and its implications for forensic psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 48(2), 146–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.200011-20
Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2 nd Ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Hendrawan, W., Eva, T.S.S., Ekaning, K., dan Nani, D. (2020). Interpersonal Meaning in RAs: Some Traces of Modality. Teknosastik. 18(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v18i2.734
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (2002). The cambridge grammar of the english language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Jannatussholihah, S & Sulis, T. (2020). Power in Indonesian presidential speeches: An analysis of linguistic modality. Lingua, 15(2), 2442–3823. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v15i2.8471
Khaofia, S. (2018). Modalitas sebagai realisasi makna interpesonal dalam Mata Najwa on stage “Semua Karena Ahok”. Prasasti: Iournal of Linguistics, 3(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/prasasti.v3i2.12490
KPAI. (2018). FBI sebut angka pedofilia Indonesia tertinggi di Asia, KPAI Protes. Diambil 8 Agustus 2021, dari KPPAI website. Retrieved from https://www.kpai.go.id/publikasi/fbi-sebut-angka-pedofilia-indonesia-tertinggi-di-asia-kpai-protes
Lillian, D. L. (2008). Modality, persuasion and manipulation in canadian conservative discourse. Critical Approaches to. Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 2(1), 1–16. Retrieved from http://cadaad.org/ejournal
Malášková, M. (2015). Hedging in academic discourse: A comparative analysis of applied linguistics and literary criticism research articles. Dissertation: Masaryk University in Brno. Retrieved from https://is.muni.cz/th/sip2p/Disertacni_prace_Malaskova_final_.pdf
Meyers, H. P. (1997). Introductory Solid state physics, second edition. London: Taylor and Francis.
Nikolovska, M. (2020). The Internet as a creator of a criminal mind and child vulnerabilities in the cyber grooming of children. Dissertation: University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved from https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/67584
Nugraha, D. N. S. (2018). The universal language phenomena in the translation of english modality into Indonesian. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 228. International Conference on Language Phenomena in Multimodal Communication (KLUA 2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/klua-18.2018.46
Olaniyan, K.K., Adeolu, & Adeniji. (2015). Modality in statement of objectives in arts-based research article abstracts. British Journal of English Linguistics, 3(1), 42–51. Retrieved from https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Modality-in-Statement-of-Objectives-in-Arts-Based-Research-Article-Abstracts.pdf
Palmer, F. R. (1979). Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.
Perkins, M. R. (1983). Modal expressions in English. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Ruffo, R. A. (2012). Sexual Predators amongst us. London: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Salles, R. (2020). Epictetus on what is in our power: modal versus epistemic conceptions. Fate, Providence and Free Will: Philosophy and Religion in Dialogue in the Early Imperial Age,. 4, 49–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004436381_005
Santoso, A. (2012). Studi bahasa kritis: Menguak bahasa membongkar kuasa. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Schuler, M., Mohnke, S., Amelung, T., Dziobek, I., Lemme, B., Borchardt, V., Gerwinn, H., Kärgel, C., Kneer, J., Massau, C., Pohl, A., Tenbergen, G., Weiß, S., Wittfoth, M., Waller, L., Beier, K. M., Walter, M., Ponseti, J., Schiffer, B., . . . Walter, H. (2019). Schuler, M., Mohnke, S., Amelung, T., Dziobek, I., Lemme, B., Borchardt, V., Gerwinn, H., Kärgel, C., Kneer, J., Massau, C., Pohl, A., Tenbergen, G., Weiß, S., Wittfoth, M., Waller, L., Beier, K. M., Walter, M., Ponseti, J., Schiffer, B., . . . Walter, H. Empathy Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(5), 453–464. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000412
Seto, M. C. (2017). The puzzle of male chronophilias. Arch Sex Behav, 46(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0799-y
Skrede, J. (2018). Kritisk diskursanalyse. Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Damm AS.
Van der Voet, J. (2020). Trust me-power in the language of sexual predators. Thesis: Vrije. Universiteit Amsterdam.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vartalla, T. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tampere, Finland.
White, P. R. (2001). An introductory tour through appraisal theory. Retrived from. https://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/appraisaloutline/framed/frame.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with The KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY 3.0).
Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal).
Authors grant KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
_.png)
