Competency achievement indicators in Indonesian high school electronic school books: Overview of the development of creative-innovative thinking aspects

Imam Safi'i; Wini Tarmini; Ade Hikmat; Prima Gusti Yanti

doi:10.22219/kembara.v8i2.21304

Authors

Imam Safi'i Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka Jakarta
Wini Tarmini Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka Jakarta
Ade Hikmat Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka Jakarta
Prima Gusti Yanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i2.21304

Keywords:

Competency achievement indicators, Creative-innovative, Electronic school books

Abstract

Creative-innovative thinking is an important competency to be developed in students so that they can be equipped in solving various challenges they face. One of the efforts to increase student competence can be done through the provision of textbooks. The purpose of writing this article is to explain the results of research on creative-innovative aspects which are indicators of competency development in high school electronic school books. The method used is content analysis, namely through excavation and in-depth meaning of various data on creative-innovative aspects in indicators of achievement of Indonesian high school electronic schoolbook competencies. The source of the data in this study was the Indonesian language electronic school book for SMA class X, XI, and XII published by the Ministry of Education and Culture. Based on the research that has been done, data is obtained, that in general the development of indicators of competency achievement has been associated with various creative-innovative aspects. However, there are still some creative-innovative aspects that have not been developed optimally, namely expressing creative ideas conceptually and practically, using failure as learning, and adapting and contributing to new situations. Each of these aspects is only 2.5%, 1.0%, and 0.5% of the total competency development indicators in the Indonesian high school electronic school book. The results of this study can be used as a basis for further development of creative-innovative aspects in Indonesian language textbooks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almutairi, A., Naeem, M. A., & Weber, G. (2021). Understanding enterprise systems adaptability: An exploratory survey. Procedia Computer Science, 197(2021), 743–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.196

Álvarez-Huerta, P., Muela, A., & Larrea, I. (2022). The disposition toward critical thinking and creative confidence beliefs in higher education students: The mediating role of openness to diversity and challenge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43(December 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101003

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995

Astuti, P. (2018). Kemampuan literasi matematika dan kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 263–268. https://doi.org/https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/19599

Ayyildiz, P., & Yilmaz, A. (2021). ‘Moving the Kaleidoscope’ to see the effect of creative personality traits on creative thinking dispositions of preservice teachers: The mediating effect of creative learning environments and teachers’ creativity fostering behavior. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(May), 100879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100879

Bašić, M. (2021). Organizational learning antecedents and open innovation: Differences in internationalization level. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 5(4), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2021.12.001

Baxter, J. (2020). Content analysis. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Second Edition) (pp. 391–396). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10805-4

Berestova, A., Ermakov, D., Aitbayeva, A., Gromov, E., & Vanina, E. (2021). Social networks to improve the creative thinking of students: How does it work? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(July), 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100912

Cheng, V. M. Y. (2019). Developing individual creativity for environmental sustainability: Using an everyday theme in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33(September 100567). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.05.001

Diana, N. (2018). Mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan berpikir logis mahasiswa dengan adversity quotient dalam pemecahan masalah. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (SNMPM), 2(1), 101–112.

Dinni, H. N. (2018). HOTS (high order thinking skills) dan kaitannya dengan kemampuan literasi matematika. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 170–176.

Dou, X., Li, H., & Jia, L. (2021). The linkage cultivation of creative thinking and innovative thinking in dance choreography. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(100896), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100896

Farhanah, N., & Safi’i, I. (2021). Analisis nilai keteladanan dalam teks biografi pada BSE bahasa Indonesia kelas X SMA tahun pelajaran 2020/2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 11(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpbs.v11i4.37154

Gibson, H. (2005). What creativity isn't: The presumptions of instrumental and individual justifications for creativity in education. British journal of educational studies, 53(2), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00288.x

Gie, T. (2003). Teknik berpikir kreatif. Yogyakarta: Sabda Persada.

Guan, M. (2021). The role of classical music in the creative thinking of university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(July), 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100925

Hadar, L. L., & Tirosh, M. (2019). Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33(September 100585). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100585

Himawan, R., & Nurgiyantoro, B. . (2022). Analisis butir soal latihan penilaian akhir semester ganjil mata pelajaran bahasa Indonesia kelas VIII SMPN 1 Bambanglipuro Bantul menggunakan program ITEMAN. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-journal), 8(1), 160-180. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i1.20530 https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i1.20530

Huang, N. tang, Chang, Y. shan, & Chou, C. hui. (2020). Effects of creative thinking, psychomotor skills, and creative self-efficacy on engineering design creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(July), 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100695

Hübel, C., Weissbrod, I., & Schaltegger, S. (2022). Strategic alliances for corporate sustainability innovation: The ‘how’ and ‘when’ of learning processes. Long Range Planning, May 2020, 102200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102200

Laila, N. A., & Ibrahim, N. (2021). Struktur dan kaidah kebahasaan cerita rakyat dalam BSE bahasa Indonesia kelas X SMA tahun pelajaran 2020/2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 11(4), 395–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpbs.v11i4.37179

Lau, K. H., Lam, T., Kam, B. H., Nkhoma, M., Richardson, J., & Thomas, S. (2018). The role of textbook learning resources in e-learning: A taxonomic study. Computers and Education, 118, 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.005

Li, L., Wang, Z., Li, Y., & Liao, A. (2021). Consumer innovativeness and organic food adoption: The mediation effects of consumer knowledge and attitudes. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1465–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.08.022

Madyani, I., Yamtinah, S., Utomo, S. B., Saputro, S., & Mahardiani, L. (2020). Profile of Students’ Creative Thinking Skills in Science Learning. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019) (pp. 957-964). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.119

Mardliyah, A. A. (2019). Budaya literasi sebagai upaya peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis di era industri revolusi 4.0. Prosiding SNP2M (Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat) UNIM, 0(1), 171–176. http://snp2m.unim.ac.id/index.php/snp2m/article/view/334

Mauliandri, R., Maimunah, M., & Roza, Y. (2021). Kesesuaian alat evaluasi dengan indikator pencapaian kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar pada RPP matematika. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 803–811. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.436.

Meilani, D., Dantes, N., & Tika, I. N. (2020). Pengaruh implementasi pembelajaran saintifik berbasis keterampilan belajar dan berinovasi 4c terhadap hasil belajar ipa dengan kovariabel sikap ilmiah pada peserta didik kelas V SD Gugus 15 Kecamatan Buleleng. Jurnal Elementary: Kajian Teori dan Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.31764/elementary.v3i1.1412

Navarro Ramón, L., & Chacón-López, H. (2021). The impact of musical improvisation on children’s creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100839

Nikander, J., Tolvanen, A., Aunola, K., & Ryba, T. V. (2022). The role of individual and parental expectations in student-athletes career adaptability profiles. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 59(November 2021), 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102127

OECD. (2021). PISA 2021 Creative Thinking Framework (Third Draft). Oecd(53), 1689–1699.

Ohme, M., & Zacher, H. (2015). Job performance ratings: The relative importance of mental ability, conscientiousness, and career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 87(April), 161–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.01.003

Purwasih, R. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari adversity quotient tipe climber. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i2.2118

Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, G., Hadisaputra, S., & Zulkifli, L. (2019). Pengembangan alat evaluasi pembelajaran IPA yang mendukung keterampilan abad-21. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.221

Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Self-efficacy and performance feedback: Impacts on cognitive load during creative thinking. Learning and Instruction, 71(June 2020), 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395

Roth, T., Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2022). The relevance of school self-concept and creativity for CLIL outreach learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73(January), 101153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101153

Safi’i, I., Rufaidah, I., Anggara, U. E., & Sobri. (2021). Instrumen evaluasi teks berita dalam buku teks BSE bahasa Indonesia. MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 7(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202172.179

Safi’i, I., Tarmini, W., & Wahdini, L. . (2021). Critical thinking in evaluation instruments at BSE Indonesian language. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-journal), 7(2), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v7i2.17300

Saragih, E., Sinulingga, S., Bukit, B., & Wiranata, V. (2022). Reconstructing cognitive levels of test items in Indonesian Textbook for vocational school. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-journal), 8(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i1.19759

Sayi, A. K., & Akgul, S. (2021). Psychometric properties of guiding creative thinking competency scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40(100811), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100811

Seo, R., & Park, J.-H. (2022). When is interorganizational learning beneficial for inbound open innovation of ventures? A contingent role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 116(August 102514). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102514

Shirish, A., Chandra, S., & Srivastava, S. C. (2021). Switching to online learning during COVID-19: Theorizing the role of IT mindfulness and techno eustress for facilitating productivity and creativity in student learning. International Journal of Information Management, 61(December 102394). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102394

Sridana, I. N., Arjudin, A., Amrullah, A., Turmuzi, M., & Junaidi, J. (2021). Sosialisasi dan implementasi perangkat pembelajaran matematika dalam mendukung keterampilan abad 21. Rengganis: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.29303/rengganis.v1i1.1

Stockinger, K., Rinas, R., & Daumiller, M. (2021). Student adaptability, emotions, and achievement: Navigating new academic terrains in a global crisis. Learning and Individual Differences, 90(August 102046). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102046

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44(June101019), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019

Sutanto, P. (2017). Panduan Implementasi Kecakapan Abad 21 Kurikulum 2013 di SMA. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Tang, C., Mao, S., Naumann, S. E., & Xing, Z. (2022). Improving student creativity through digital technology products: A literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44(June 101032). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101032

Usher, M., Barak, M., & Haick, H. (2021). Online vs. on-campus higher education: Exploring innovation in students’ self-reports and students’ learning products. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42(December 100965). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100965

Verkijika, S. F. (2019). Digital textbooks are useful but not everyone wants them: The role of technostress. Computers and Education, 140(February), 103591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.017

Wang, X., Zhuang, K., Li, Z., & Qiu, J. (2022). The functional connectivity basis of creative achievement is linked with openness to experience and divergent thinking. Biological Psychology, 168(February). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108260

Widiawati, L., Joyoatmojo, S., & Sudiyanto, S. (2018). Higher order thinking skills as effect of problem based learning in the 21st century learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 96-105. Retrieved from https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/223

Yang, J., & Zhao, X. (2021). The effect of creative thinking on academic performance: Mechanisms, heterogeneity, and implication. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(June 100831), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100831

Yildiz, C., & Guler Yildiz, T. (2021). Exploring the relationship between creative thinking and scientific process skills of preschool children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39(February), 100795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100795

Zehui, L., Liu, P., Huang, L., Chen, J., Qiu, X., & Huang, X. (2019). DropAttention: A regularization method for fully-connected self-attention networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11065. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.11065