Indonesian Netizens' Emotive Language in Responding to YouTube Posts: Cyberpragmatics Study

Agung Pramujiono; Nur Rohmah; Amelia Widya Hanindita; Mimas Ardhianti

doi:10.22219/kembara.v9i2.23827

Authors

Agung Pramujiono Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia
Nur Rohmah Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia
Amelia Widya Hanindita Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia
Mimas Ardhianti Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v9i2.23827

Keywords:

cyberpragmatics, emotive language, Indonesian netizens, youtube

Abstract

Indonesian internet users (Netizens) are considered uncivilized in using the internet. The Digital Civility Index (DCI) states that the politeness of Indonesian netizens was ranked 29th out of 32 countries and the worst in Southeast Asia. The uncivility of netizens is closely related to the use of emotive language, so it is necessary to study the use of emotive language by netizens. The emotive language of Indonesian netizens in responding to YouTube posts is very interesting to study from a cyberpragmatic perspective. Cyberpragmatic studies are the use of language and communication in a digital environment or in cyberspace. The problems studied in this study are formulated: (1) How is the lingual form of the emotive language of Indonesian netizens realized in responding to YouTube posts in a cyberpramatic perspective? And (2) How is the emotive language function of Indonesian netizens realized in responding to YouTube posts in a cyberpramatic perspective? The purpose of this study is to describe and explain the realization of the form of Indonesian netizen emotive language and the function of netizen emotive language in responding on YouTube posts. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The research data is in the form of netizens' verbal responses to internet-mediated YouTube posts as a field for cyberpragmatic studies. Data was collected using the Simak Bebas Libat Cakap (SBLC) technique. Data analysis was carried out using descriptive techniques using the interactive model Miles and Huberman (1992) with the stages of data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and verification/drawing conclusions. Based on the results of data analysis, it was concluded that the lingual form of emotive language is stated in utterances in declarative, interrogative, and directive modes, while the function of emotive language is stated in delarative speech acts with the function of stating, informing, confirming, giving advice, and praying; in expressive speech acts with functions of praising, expressing pleasure, expressing pride, thanking, apologizing, satirizing, mocking, and insulting; in imperative speech acts with functions of ordering, prohibiting, inviting, and asking. The conclusion of this study is that the lingual form of emotive language is realized in speech in declarative, interrogative, and directive modes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardhianti, M., & Indayani, I. (2022). Tuturan yang berdampak hukum ditinjau dari elemen dan fungsi konteks kultural di media sosial Tik-Tok Indonesia. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(1), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i1.19235

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Caffi, C., & Janney, R. W. (1994). Towards a pragmatic of emotive communication. Special Issue of Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 325–373.

Creswel, J. W. (2017). Research design: pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Cullpeper, J., Bousfield, D., & Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of pragmatics, 35(10-11), 1545-1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2

Dewi, B. K. (2021). Netizen indonesia paling tidak sopan se-Asia Tenggara, pengamat sebut ada 3 faktor penyebab. Kompas. com, 349-371. Retrieved from nasional. kompas. com website: https://www.kompas.com/sains/read/2021/02/26/194500523/netizen-indonesia-paling-tidak- sopan-se-asia-tenggara-pengamat-sebut-ada-3?page=al

Gunawan, I., Sumarsono, R. B., Benty, D. D. N., Baharudin, A., Wardani, A. D., Kusumaningrum, D. E., & Prayoga, A. G. (2021, September). The effectiveness of using SIPEJAR to improve the quality of learning with the information technology-based interactive skill station method. In 2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET) (pp. 81-89). IEEE.

Jamal, J. (2021). Tindak Pengancaman dan Penyelamatan Muka dalam Komunikasi Virtual di Grup Whatsapp “WI Teknis BDK Surabaya”. Jurnal Widyaiswara Indonesia, 2(1), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.56259/jwi.v2i1.76

Kidron, Y., & Kuzar, R. (2002). My face is paling against my will: Emotion and control in English and Hebrew. Pragmatics & Cognition, 10 (The Body in Description of Emotion), 129-157. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.10.1-2.07kid

Kurniasih, N., & Rahmansyah, S. (2019). Politeness Strategy to Prevent and Resolve Cyber-Conflicts Among Indonesian Internet Users: A Cyberpragmatics Approach. Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora, 18(1), 68-79.

Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2010). The argumentative uses of emotive language. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación, 1(1), 1–33.

Martins, R., Gomes, M., Almeida, J. J., Novais, P., & Henriques, P. (2018, October). Hate speech classification in social media using emotional analysis. In 2018 7th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS) (pp. 61-66). IEEE.

Maudina, F. A., Kamaruddin, K., & Setyonegoro, A. (2022). Kesantunan Imperatif dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Kelas VII D SMPN 16 Kota Jambi. Berajah Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pembelajaran dan Pengembangan Diri, 2(4), 721-732. https://doi.org/10.47353/bj.v2i4.158

Mazrieva, E. (2021). Indeks keberadaban digital: Indonesia terburuk se-Asia Tenggara. VOA Indonesia.

Mentari, R. S. (2021). An analysis of classroom interaction in English foreign language (EFL) classroom at the 11th grade of SMAN 1 Bengkulu Tengah (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Fatmawati Sukarno).

Mey, J. L. (1993). Pragmatics: An Introducton. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publisher.

Milles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif: buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru. Jakarta: UIP Press.

Moeliono, A. M., Lapoliwa, H., Alwi, H., & Sasangka, S. S. T. W. (2017). Tata bahasa baku bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Moleong. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mursid, F., & Maharani, E. (2021). Kominfo: Pengguna Internet Indonesia Terbesar Ke-4 di Dunia. Republika. Co. Id.

Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pramujiono, A. (2011). Representasi Kesantunan Positif-Negatif Brown dan Levinson dalam Wacana Dialog di Televisi. Artikel ini telah dipresentasikan dalam Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia (KIMLI), 2.

Pramujiono, A. (2012). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Wacana Dialog di Televisi. Disertasi Doktor Tidak Diterbitkan. Surabaya: PPs UNESA [Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya].

Pramujiono, A., & Indrayanti, T. (2018). Ujaran Emotif Tr Walikota Surabaya: Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Artikel ini telah dipresentasikan dalam Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya 18.

Pramujiono, A., Suhari, S. H., Rachmadtullah, R., Indrayanti, T., & Setiawan, B. (2020). Kesantunan Berbahasa, Pendidikan Karater, Dan Pembelajaran Yang Humanis. Indocamp.

Prasetyani, Y. M., & Widiarini, A. D. (2021). Internet Sudah Jadi Napas Baru Kehidupan di Tengah Pandemi. Retrieved from nasional. kompas. com website: https://nasional. kompas. com/read/2021/04/04/09020061/internet-sudah-jadi-napasbaru-kehidupan-di-tengah-pandemi.

Pratama, Y. A. (2022). Ujaran Kebencian Pengguna Facebook Bulan Januari-Febuari 2022 (Kajian Pragmatik Siber). Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran, 17(27), 1-13.

Rahardi, K. (2000). Imperatif dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana Unievrsity Press.

Rahardi, K. (2020). Variasi Maksud Kata Emotif “Wela” dalam Bahasa Jawa: Perspektif Sosiopragmatik. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 9(2), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v9i2.2937

Rahardi, R. K. (2020b). Konteks Eksternal Virtual dalam Pragmatik Siber. LOA: Jurnal Ketatabahasaan dan Kesusastraan, 15(2), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.26499/loa.v15i2.2347

Rahardi, R. K. (2021a). Emotikon sebagai Konteks Maksud dalam Cyberpragmatics (Emoticons as an Intended Context in Cyberpragmatics). SAWERIGADING, 27(2), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.26499/sawer.v27i2.884

Rahardi, R. K. (2021b). Learning strategy of virtual external context landscape in educational pragmatics strategi pembelajaran lanskap konteks eksternal virtual dalam pragmatik edukasional. Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 226-237.

Rahardi, R. K. (2022). Memerikan Fungsi Konteks Situasi dalam Perspektif Pragmatik Siber. Linguistik Indonesia, 40(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v40i2.286

Riordan, M. A., & Kreuz, R. J. (2010). Emotion encoding and interpretation in computer-mediated communication: Reasons for use. Computers in human behavior, 26(6), 1667-1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.015

Romadhon, S., Saputra, A. W., & Nurhuda, D. A. (2022). Tinjauan Pragmatik Siber Pada Acara Virtual Doa Lintas Agama Pray from Home untuk Mengatasi Pandemi Covid-19. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(2), 319-338. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v11i2.5195

Roseman, I. J., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Appraisal theory. Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, 3-19.

Sawirman, S. (2014). Awareness Centered Learning as One of the Language Learning Models to Build the Good Character of Learners-based Innovative Creator in the Future. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 2, 394-401.

Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (2001). Appraisal Theory: Overview, Assumptions, Varieties. Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. Oxford Universitu Press.

Schnall, S. (2005). The pragmatics of emotion language. Psychological Inquiry, 16(1), 28-31.

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2005). Discourse and intercultural communication. The handbook of discourse analysis, 537-547. 10.1002/9780470753460

Sudaryanto. (2015). Bahasa, Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisa Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Wilce, J. W. (2009). Language and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, L., Arribas-Ayllon, M., Artemiou, A., & Spasić, I. (2019). Comparing the utility of different classification schemes for emotive language analysis. Journal of Classification, 36, 619-648.

Yus, F. (2001). Ciberpragmática: entre la compensación y el desconcierto. In Presentado en Congresos Internacionales de la Lengua Española: Congreso de Valladolid. Recuperado el (Vol. 12).

Yus, F. (2004). Ciberpragmática. Espana: Editorial Ariel.

Yus, F. (2005). Attitudes and emotions through written text: The case of textual deformation in Internet chat rooms. Pragmalingüística. 13, 147–174.

Yus, F. (2007). “Estrategias interpretativas en los ciber-medios.” Paper presented at VIII Ciclo de Conferencias “Adquisición y uso de segundas lenguas” (Nuevas tecnologías en la enseñanza/aprendizaje de segundas lenguas), Seville (Spain), Pablo de Olavide University.

Yus, F. (2008). Alterations of relevance in cyber-media. Universitas Psychologica, 7(3), 629-642.

Yus, F. (2010). Ciberpragmática 2.0. Nuevos Usos del Lenguaje en Internet. Espana: Editorial Ariel.

Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Yusuf, F. (2020). Performance “Ellen with Will Smith Full Interview” Talk Show: Emotive Language Functions. Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Bahasa, 13(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.33557/binabahasa.v13i01.872