Impoliteness Strategy for Cyberbullying in Indonesian on Instagram Social Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v9i2.25517Keywords:
cyberbullying, negative impoliteness, positive impoliteness, instagram social mediaAbstract
Power relations in the use of language on social media can give rise to language deviation in the form of hate speech or cyberbulling. This research aims to explain how impolite strategies in the form of cyberbullying speech in Indonesian on social media have the potential to violate the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law. This research uses a content analysis method. The researchers utilized a scrutinizing approach through the Scrutinize, Be Free, Get Involved, Talk (Simak Bebas Libat Cakap/SBLC) technique as a basic stage and a note-taking technique was applied as an advanced technique. This research data is in the form of fragments of netizen comments and captions on Ayu Ting-Ting's haters account on Instagram which contains cyberbullying hate speech conveyed by netizens on Instagram. The research results show that there are two types of impoliteness strategy, namely positive impoliteness and negative impoliteness. Positive impoliteness was found in nineteen comments with a percentage of 38%, while negative impoliteness was found the most with thirty-one comments with a percentage of 62%. Negative impoliteness strategy is higher because there are many characteristics of negative impoliteness strategy, including attacking or threating negative face of the interlocutor, impoliteness by scaring the interlocutor, impoliteness by ridiculing or mocking, impoliteness by warning the interlocutor. The conclusion of this research is that more negative impoliteness strategy is used when using Indonesian on social media. This tendency is the cause of the increasingly widespread cyberbullying that occurs in the use of social media today.
Downloads
References
Aboujaoude, E., Savage, M. W., Starcevic, V., & Salame, W. O. (2015). Cyberbullying: Review of an Old Problem Gone Viral. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.011.
Adilla, N. (2009). Pengaruh Kontrol Sosial terhadap Perilaku Bullying Pelajar di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 5(1), 56-66.
Alamsyah, R. (2011). Pengertian Cyberbullying dan Bagaimana Bentuknya. http://infopsikologi.com/apa-pengertian-cyberbullying-dan-bagaimana-bentuknya/.Accessed on 5 December 2014.
Ardhianti, M., & Indayani, I. (2022). Tuturan yang Berdampak Hukum Ditinjau dari Elemen dan Fungsi Konteks Kultural di Media Sosial Tik-Tok Indonesia. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(1), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i1.19235.
Arsel, Z. F. (2018). Proses Penyidikan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Menyebarkan Ujaran Kebencian melalui Facebook. Skripsi. Unika Soegijapranata Semarang.
Bauman, S., Donna, C., & Jenny, W. (2013). Principles of Cyberbullying. New York: Taylor and Francis.
Bhat, C., & Suniti, S. (2008). Cyber Bullying: Overview and Strategies for School Counselors, Guidance Officers, and all School Personnel. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counseling 18, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.18.1.53.
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Brailovskaia, J., Teismann, T., & Margraf, J. (2018). Cyberbullying, Positive Mental Health and Suicide Ideation/Behavior. Psychiatry Research, 267, 240-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres. 2018.05.074.
Brequet, T. (2010). Cyberbullying. USA: Rosyen Publishing.
Bungin, B. (2011). Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Group.
Busri, H., & Badrih, M. (2022). Representation of Linguistic Characteristics in Mass Media. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22219/ kembara.v8i1.19324.
Chun, J., Lee, J., Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2020). An International Systematic Review of Cyberbullying Measurements. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106485. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.chb.2020.106485.
Cohen, R. (2014). Regulating Hate Speech: Nothing Customary About it. Chicago Journal of International Law, 15(1), 229-239.
Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(2), 35–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35.
Culpeper, J. (2008). Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. International Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diani, I., & Yunita, W. (2022). A Pragmatics Study on Verbal Abuse Against Women and Children by Bengkulu Communities on Social-Media, at Schools, and in Families. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(2), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.22219/ kembara.v8i2.21900.
Donegan, R. (2012). Bullying and Cyberbullying: History, Statistics, Law, Prevention and Analysis. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 3(1), 33-42.
Farnia, M., et. al. (2014). A pragmatic analysis of speech act of suggestion amonng iranian native speakers of farsi. Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL), 2(2), 48-61.
Fasold, R. W., & Jeff, C. (2006). An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Febriyanti, M. (2018). Analisis faktor penyebab pelaku melakukan ujaran kebencian (hate speech) dalam media sosial. Jurnal Penale, 6(3), 1-12.
Glagiordone, I, Alisha, P., & Matti, P. (2014). Mapping and Analysing Hate Speech Online: Opportunities and Challenges for Ethiopia. University of Oxford.
Goodman, D. J., & Goerge, R. (2004). Teori Sosiologi Modren. Jakarta: Kencana.
Inderasari, E., Hapsari, D. A., Rosita, F. Y., & Ulya, C. (2021). Analisis Penggunaan Gaya Bahasa Iklan Layanan Masyarakat Bijak Bersosial Media di Radio Kota Surakarta. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 7(2), 508-528. https://doi.org/10.22219/ kembara. v7i2.17893.
Kim, K. (2022). The Relationship Between Adolescents’ Internet Addiction and Alienation Kyoyuk Simni Yo˘n’gu. Korean Journal of Educational Psycology. 16(1), 5-22.
Leech, G. N. (1993). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lestari, D. P. (2016). Ungkapan Kebencian yang Muncul pada Fenomena Islamophobia di United Kingdom. Tesis. Universitas Gajah Mada.
Levinson, S. C. (1987). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Linawati, L. (2017). Tindak Tutur Ujaran Kebencian dalam Komentar Pembaca pada Surat Kabar Online Tribunnews.com. Bachelor Thesis. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Mansor, N. S., Mamat, R., Omar, R. C., & Ghazali, A. H. A. (2014). Ketidaksantunan Bahasa Sebagai Strategi Pujukan dalam Iklan Berbahasa Sepanyol. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(3), 207-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1403-13.
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ningrum, E., Nandi, D., & Sungkawa (2018). The Impact of Local Wisdom-Based Learning Model on Students’ Understanding on The Land Ethic. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 145, 1-5.
Olamide, I, S. (2014). A Speech Act Analysis of Editorial Comment of TELL Magazine. Journal International on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(9), 1-8.
Permatasari, D. (2019). Ilokusi Ujaran Kebencian Facebook Tahun 2017-2019. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Pramujiono, A. (2012). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Wacana Dialog di Televisi. Master Thesis. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Pyle, L. (2008). Teens and Internet Communication: What's Normal and What's a Problem? Alternative Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 25-32.
Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. J. (2004). Structural Functionalism, Neofunctionalism, and Conflict Theory. Cambrigde Press.
Saifullah, A. R. (2016). Analisis Teks Tanggapan Pengguna Internet terhadap Teks Media Siber yang Berdampak Hukum (Kajian Linguistik Forensik Berbasis Semiotik-Pragmatik). Prosiding SETALI, 1-5.
Sari, I. D. (2019). Ujaran Kebencian pada Wacana Talk Show Indonesia Lawyers Club. Bachleor Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Sari, F. D. P. (2012). Tindak Tutur Dan Fungsi Tuturan Ekspresif dalam Acara Galau Finite di Metro TV: Suatu Kajian Pragmatik. Jurnal Skriptorium, 1(2), 1-14.
Shabrina, S. N., & Setiawan, T. (2022). Analisis Teks Hoaks Seputar Informasi Bank: Kajian Bahasa Perspektif Analisis Wacana Kritis dan Linguistik Forensik. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(2), 492-507. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i2.21478.
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The Nature of Cyberbullying, and Strategies for Prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024.
Subyantoro, S. (2019). Linguistik Forensik: Sumbangsih Kajian Bahasa dalam Penegakan Hukum. Jurnal Adil Indonesia, 1(1), 36-50.
Subyantoro, S. (2022). Linguistik Forensik: Sebuah Pengantar. Semarang: Farishma Indonesia.
Sudaryanto. (1988a). Metode Linguistik: Bagian Pertama: ke Arah Memahami Metode Linguistik (Linguistic Methods: Part I: Understanding Linguistic Method). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Sudaryanto. (1988b). Metode Linguistik: Bagian Kedua: Metode dan Aneka Tehnik Pengumpulan Data (Linguistic Methods: Part II: Method and Techniques of Data Collection). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Syafyahya, L. (2018). Ujaran Kebencian dalam Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian Bentuk dan Makna. Makalah Kongres KBI 2018. Universitas Andalas.
Teasley, M. (2013). Cyberbullying, youth behavior and society. Journal Child Adolesc Behav, 2, 119-120. https://doi.org/10.4172/jcalb.1000119.
Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(5), 483-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth. 2014.12.002.
Widodo, L. A. (2017). Ujaran Kebencian Terhadap Pejabat Publik dalam Media Sosial: Kajian Pragmatik Pendekatan Gender. Master Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Willard, N. E. (2011). Cyberbullying and cyberhearts. USA: Malloy.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with The KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY 3.0).
Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal).
Authors grant KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
_.png)
