Cak Lontong's Humorous Discourse on Youtube Media in Pragmatic Perspective

Authors

  • Muhammad Rohmadi Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Aziz Fauzi Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf, Indonesia
  • Zindan Baynal Hubi Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf, Indonesia
  • Aditya Pratama Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v9i2.26855

Keywords:

Cak Lontong, humor, maxim of cooperation, speech act, pragmatics

Abstract

This study discusses the use of various speech acts in humorous discourse used by Cak Lontong on YouTube media from a pragmatic perspective. Humor can be used to convey multiple intentions that are described in a more relaxed and entertaining manner. Speakers and partners must understand the uniqueness of humorous speech so that the meaning of the speech can be adequately understood. This study used the qualitative descriptive method. The data source used is a document in the form of Cak Lontong's humorous speech in the Cak Lontong YouTube video. The data used in this study is the humorous speech of Cak Lontong, which entertains the opponent or audience. The focus of this research is to: (1) explain the function of speech acts; (2) explain the maxim of cooperation and violations of the maxim of cooperation; and (3) describe the use of direct and indirect speech acts. Based on the analysis and discussion results, it can be concluded that Cak Lontong uses assertive, rescriptive, expressive, and declarative speech acts to create humor. In addition, the speech delivered also contains direct and indirect speech and violates the principle of cooperation to create humor for the interlocutor or audience. The power of communication is in the speech process. The construction of meaning that the speaker can translate well will make the speech more interesting. The pragmatic approach is an alternative concept for speakers and co-speakers in constructive communicative activities. This study used a pragmatic approach to describe and explain the various speech acts used by Cak Lontong with humor. Various discussions by researchers about the maxim of politeness, the function of speech acts, direct speech acts, and indirect speech acts were an effort to describe the various speech acts of Cak Lontong in various contexts of speech. Different discussions are expected to provide theoretical implications regarding the pragmatic approach in Cak Lontong's humorous discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anam, K., Wuryaningrum, R., & Syukron, A. (2020). Wacana Humor dalam Bajigur TV. Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran, 9(2), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.35194/alinea.v9i2.1001

Bachari, A. D., & Juansah, D. E. (2017). Pragmatik: Analisis Penggunaan Bahasa. Prodi Linguistik SPS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Banas, J. A., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.496867.

Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2015). Exploratory theoretical tests of the instructor humor–student learning link. Educ6, 64(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03634523.2014.978793.

Bram, B., & Truly, A. P. (2020). Indonesian Gender-Specific Neologisms. Linguistik Indonesia, 38(2), 105–121.

Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2010). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Cropley, A. (2019). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. Zinātne. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3095.6888.

Djajasudarma, F. (1993). Metode Lingustik: Rancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. PT. Eresco.

Fauzi, A., Riansi, E. S., & Kurniasih, D. (2020). Expressive Action on Meme in Instagram Towards the Election of President and Vice President 2019. AKSIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(2), 252-269. https://doi.org/10.21009/AKSIS.040202

Fauzi, A., Andayani, A., & Rohmadi, M. (2021). Measuring the Use of Politeness in Language on the Demonstration Poster International Women’s Day 2020 (Pragmatic Studies). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(6), 77-88 http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i6.2649

Fauzi, A., Andayani, A., & Rohmadi, M. (2022). The Use of Speech Act Functions for Women in the 2020 International Women’s Day Demonstration in Jakarta: Feminist Study. Society, 10(2), 639-652. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v10i2.325

Fauzi, A., & Nurhidayatullah, D. (2021). Tindak Tutur dalam Ungkapan Grafiti pada Bak Truk di Pelabuhan Merak, Cilegon, Banten. Kibas Cendrawasih, 18(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.26499/kc.v18i2.295

Grice, H. P. (1957). “Meaning”. The Philosophical Review. Duke University Press.

Hastuti, N. P., & Rohmadi, M. (2023). Illocutionary Speech Acts of Ustaz Salim A. Fillah Lecture Video in The Culture Edition. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 5(1), 39–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v5i1.39-58

Hermiaji, B. (2019). Teori Pragmatik. Magnum Pustaka Utama.

House, J., Kádár, D. Z., Liu, F., & Bi, Z. (2021). Altered speech act indication: A problem for foreign language learners? System, 101, 102554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102554

House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2021). Cross-cultural pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ilmi, M., & Baehaqie, I. (2021). Tindak Tutur Ilokusi pada Program Acara Talk Show Mata Najwa Episode Gus Mus dan Negeri Teka-Teki. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 10(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v10i1.40396

Inzani, F. I. (2022, May). Expressive Speech Acts Function of Wise Quotes on@ Boycandra’s Instagram for the Millennial Generation’s Self-Esteem Development. In International Conference of Learning on Advance Education (ICOLAE 2021) (pp. 556-562). Atlantis Press.

Kádár, D. Z., House, J., Liu, F., & Jiao, L. (2023). Self-denigration in Chinese: An interactional speech act approach. Language & Communication, 88, 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.008

Kurniati, E. (2017). The correlation of students’ listening habit in english conversation with vocabulary mastery of the second semester students’ English education at teacher training and education faculty at Batanghari University Academic Year 2015/2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 17(1), 228–237. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v17i1.170

Kusmanto, H., Sabardila, A., & Al-Ma'ruf, A. I. (2021). Diksi dalam wacana humor Indonesia di media sosial (Diction in Indonesia Humor Discourse on Sosial Media). Kandai, 17(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v17i1.2186

Lee, S., Kenworthy, J. B., & Paulus, P. B. (2022). Effects of positive affect and humor on divergent thinking. Journal of Creativity, 32(3), 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100037

Marsili, N., & Green, M. (2021). Assertion: A (partly) social speech act. Journal of Pragmatics, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.016

Milles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis Third Edition. SAGE Publications.

Musika, T. M., Agustina, & Syahrul, R. (2019). Verbal Violence Performed by Supporters Group of Gubernatorial Candidates in The Political Discourse of Jakarta Election. Jurnal Humanus, 18(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v18i1.9081

Pangesti, C. R. N., Markhamah, M., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2022). Muatan pendidikan karakter dalam wacana humor Covid-19. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 8(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i1.19932

Novitasari, D., Budinuryanta, Y., & Suhartono. (2019). Tuturan Persuasif dalam Video Blog Kecantikan: Kajian Pragmastilistika. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 5(1), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.22219/KEMBARA.Vol5.No2.168-181

Paoli, S., & Davidson, H. (2023). Pragmatic markers and verba dicendi: An investigation of Mauritian Creole. Journal of Pragmatics, 214, 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.06.011

Parker. (1986). Language and Pragmatic. Penguin Education.

Pratiwi, V. U., & Rohmadi, M. (2021). Pragmatic Approach to Indonesian Speaking Skills for Student Vocational High Schools. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(4), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.21744/IJLLC.V7N4.1795

Rahardi, K., & All, E. (2016). Pragmatik: Fenomena Ketiadksantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rohmadi, M. (2023). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan dalam Judul Berita Politik Pilkada pada Media Cetak dalam Perspektif Pragmatik. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 12(1), 22–30. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jsi/article/view/67417

Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts1. Language in society, 5(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837

Wellenzohn, S., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2018). Who benefits from humor-based positive psychology interventions? The moderating effects of personality traits and sense of humor. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00821

Soedjarwo, G. N. (2020). Persuasion Act in the Proposal Movie. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 2(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1836/jopr.v2i1.50-67

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan teknik analisis bahasa. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Wacana Kartun dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-08

How to Cite

Rohmadi, M., Fauzi, A., Hubi, Z. B., & Pratama, A. (2023). Cak Lontong’s Humorous Discourse on Youtube Media in Pragmatic Perspective. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 9(2), 376–386. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v9i2.26855

Issue

Section

Articles