LITERASI BACA TULIS DAN INOVASI KURIKULUM BAHASA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v5i1.7842Keywords:
inovasi, kurikulum, literasi, menulis, membacaAbstract
Kurikulum pendidikan di Indonesia mengalami perubahan pada tahun 2013. Perubahan tersebut merupakan usaha untuk meningkatkan mutu pendidikan di Indonesia. Pada pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia, kurikulum yang digunakan adalah berbasis teks. Beberapa tahun kemudian, untuk mewujudkan visi dan misi agar masyarakat dapat beradaptasi dengan kemajuan pengetahuan dan teknologi, pemerintah mengeluarkan kebijakan tentang Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (GLS) dan diperbarui dengan Gerakan Literasi Nasional (GLN). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kegiatan literasi yang dilakukan di sekolah dan melihat respon siswa setelah dilaksanakan kegiatan literasi. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan untuk mempertimbangkan literasi sebagai inovasi kurikulum di sekolah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan teknik wawancara terstruktur dan teknik pengumpulan angket. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah pedoman wawancara dan lembar kuesioner. Wawancara dilakukan dengan tujuh orang guru Bahasa Indonesia di Sumatera Barat dan Angket diisi oleh 30 orang siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam pelaksanaannya, literasi tidak dilaksanakan dengan aturan yang ditetapkan. Tujuan dari literasi tersebut juga tidak tercapai dengan mestinya. Dalam pelaksanaannya, kurikulum dan literasi seolah-olah merupakan dua hal yang berbeda dan pelaksanaan yang tidak sejalan. Padahal, kegiatan pembelajaran yang dilakukan merupakan kegiatan literasi. Khusus pada pembelajaran bahasa, literasi yang dilakukan adalah literasi baca dan tulis.Downloads
References
Aydin, H., Ozfidan, B., & Carothers, D. (2017). Meeting the Challenges of Curriculum and Instruction in School Settings in the United States. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(3), 76-92.
Barnet, R., & Coate, K. (2015). Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press and McGraw Hill Education.
Bumen, N. T., Cakar, E., & Yildiz, D. G. (2014). Curriculum Fidelity and Factors Affecting Fidelity in the Turkish Context. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 219-228.
Burns, R. W., Yendol-Hoppey, D., & Jacobs, J. (2015). High-Quality Teaching Requires Collaboration: How Partnerships Can Create a True Continuum of Professional Learning for Educators. Paper presented at the The Educational Forum.
Clasquin-Johnson, M. G. (2016). Now and Then: Revisiting Early Childhood Teachers' Reactions to Curriculum Change. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 6(1), 1-9.
Cooper, T. (2017). Curriculum Renewal: Barriers to Successful Curriculum Change and Suggestions for Improvement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11), 115-128.
Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A Review of Research on Fidelity of Implementation: Implications for Drug Abuse Prevention in School Settings. Health education research, 18(2), 237-256.
Hassen, R. (2015). Implementation of online reading assesment of encourage reading interests. Canadian Center of Science and Education, English Language Teaching, 18(1), 197-206.
Hoydalsvik, T. E. L. (2017). Co-Operation is Not Enough: Teacher Educators as Curriculum Developers in Times of Change. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 76-87.
Hubball, H., & Burt, H. (2014). An Integrated Approach to Developing and Implementing Learning‐Centred Curricula. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 51-65.
Jackson, J. (2005). An Inter-University, Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Business Education: Perceptions of Business Faculty in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 293-306.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). The Challenge of Developing and Maintaining Curriculum Innovation at Higher Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 73-78.
Longhurst, M. J. (2016). Curriculum Renewal in a Small Island State: Stabilization and Early Recovery Phases of Reconstruction. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 15(4), 66-85.
McGowan, U. (2018). Integrated Academic Literacy Development: Learner-Teacher Autonomy for MELTing the Barriers. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(4), 6.
Musfiroh, T., & Listyorini, B. (2016). Konstruk Kompetensi Literasi untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. LITERA, 15(1).
Nhlapo, M. D., & Maharajh, L. R. (2017). Engaging Foreign Curriculum Experts in Curriculum Design: A Case Study of Primary School Curriculum Change in Lesotho. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1741-1747.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
Perry, K. H., & Homan, A. (2014). “What I Feel in My Heart” Literacy Practices of and for the Self Among Adults With Limited or No Schooling. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(4), 422-454.
Petrone, R. (2013). Linking Contemporary Research on Youth, Literacy, and Popular Culture with Literacy Teacher Education. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(3), 240-266.
Pinto, L., Boler, M., & Norris, T. (2007). Literacy is Just Reading and Writing, isn't it? the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test and its Press Coverage. Policy Futures in Education, 5(1), 84-99.
PIRLS. (2011). International report. performance at the PIRLS 2011. Lynch School of Education, Boston College: International Benchmarks TIMMS & PIRLS Report International Study Center (IEA).
Psifidou, I. (2009). Innovation in School Curriculum: the Shift to Learning Outcomes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2436-2440.
Purcell-Gates, V., Anderson, J., Gagne, M., Jang, K., Lenters, K. A., & McTavish, M. (2012). Measuring Situated Literacy Activity: Challenges and Promises. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(4), 396-425.
Rahanu, H., Georgiadou, E., Khan, N., Colson, R., Hill, V., & Edwards, J. A. (2016). The Development of Student Learning and Information Lliteracy: A Case Study. Education for Information, 32(3), 211-224.
Ramberg, M. R. (2014). What Makes Reform Work?--School-Based Conditions as Predictors of Teachers' Changing Practice after a National Curriculum Reform. International Education Studies, 7(6), 46-65.
Rekkor, S., Ümarik, M., & Loogma, K. (2013). Adoption of National Curricula by Vocational Teachers in Estonia. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 65(4), 489-506.
Rivers, W. (1976). Speaking in Many Tongues: Essay in Foreign Language Teaching. Rowley: MA Newbury House.
Rogers, T., Tyson, C., & Marshall, E. (2000). Living Dialogues in One Neighborhood: Moving Toward Understanding Across Discourses and Practices of Literacy and Schooling. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(1), 1-24.
Rumahlatu, D., Huliselan, E. K., & Takaria, J. (2016). An Analysis of the Readiness and Implementation of 2013 Curriculum in the West Part of Seram District, Maluku Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12), 5662-5675.
Solikhah, I. (2015). Reading and Writing as Academic Literacy in EAP Program of Indonesian Leaners. Dinamika Ilmu: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 325-341.
Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical Approaches to Literacy in Theory and Practice. Current issues in comparative education, 5(2), 77-91.
Suryaman, M. (2015). Analisis Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik dalam Literasi Membaca melalui Studi Internasional (PIRLS) 2011. LITERA, 14(1), 170-186.
Tavdgiridze, L. (2016). Literacy Competence Formation of the Modern School. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(26), 107-110.
UNESCO. (2015). Literacy. from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/education-buildingblocks/literacy/
Uztozun, M. S., & Troudi, S. (2015). Lecturers' Views of Curriculum Change at English Language Teaching Departments in Turkey. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language,, 9(1), 15-29.
Wingate, U. (2012). Using Academic Literacies and Genre-Based Models for Academic Writing Instruction: A ‘Literacy’ Journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 26-37.
Young, M. (2014). What is a Curriculum and What Can it Do? Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 7-13.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with The KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) agree to the following terms:
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY 3.0).
Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).
Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal).
Authors grant KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (e-Journal) the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.
_.png)
