Nurses Assessment Accuracy And Self Confidence In Performing SALT Triage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22219/jk.v11i2.10287Keywords:
SALT Triage, assessment accuracy, self confidenceAbstract
Introduction: The nurses' assessment accuracy and confidence in the handling of mass victims of traffic accidents in the prehospital phase was an important success key of subsequent handling of victims when taken to the hospital, and vice versa if there was an error in providing help could be fatal for victims. The purpose of this study was to determine the comparison of face-to-face and watch video simulations of the assessment accuracy and nurses’ confidence in conducting prehospital disaster triage of victims of land traffic accidents using the SALT Triage model.
Research Methods: Quasi experimental research with nonequivalent control group design. The sample size was 32 nurses who were divided into 2 groups, namely the face-to-face simulation group and the watch video SALT Triage simulation group. The samples were taken by non-random sampling with purposive sampling technique. Data analysis used was Paired t test and Independent t-test
Results: There was no difference in the average nurses’ assessment accuracy and confidence in the face-to-face group with the group watching the simulation video. Statistical test results obtained p value> α = 0.05
Conclusion: The sorting mass victims of the SALT Triage model can teach nurses by providing face-to-face or watching a simulation video about SALT Triage. Both ways were equally good at conveying informationDownloads
References
Barratt, J. (2010) ‘A focus group study of the use of video-recorded simulated objective structured clinical examinations in nurse practitioner education’, Nurse Education in Practice. Elsevier Ltd, 10(3), pp. 170–175. Bias, C. G. S. et al. (2016) ‘Simulation in emergency nursing education : An integrative review’, Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(12), pp. 12–17. Björn, A. et al. (2017) ‘Video education for critical care nurses to assess pain with a behavioural pain assessment tool: A descriptive comparative study’, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. Elsevier Ltd, 42, pp. 68–74. Debacker, M. et al. (2016) ‘SIMEDIS: a Discrete-Event Simulation Model for Testing Responses to Mass Casualty Incidents’, Journal of Medical Systems. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(12). Farra, S. et al. (2013) ‘Improved Training for Disasters Using 3-D Virtual Reality Simulation’, Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35(5), pp. 655–671. Fikriana, R. (2018) ‘Pengaruh Simulasi Public Safety Center Terhadap Peningkatan Self Efficacy Koordinasi Sistem Penanggulangan Gawat Darurat Terpadu’, Ejournal, 9, pp. 35–42. Grant, J. S. et al. (2014) ‘Comparing the effectiveness of video-assisted oral debriefing and oral debriefing alone on behaviors by undergraduate nursing students during high-fidelity simulation’, Nurse Education in Practice. Elsevier Ltd, 14(5), pp. 479–484. Kerie, S., Tilahun, A. and Mandesh, A. (2018) ‘Triage skill and associated factors among emergency nurses in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2017: A cross-sectional study’, BMC Research Notes. BioMed Central, 11(1), pp. 1–7. Kushayati, N. (2014) Analisis Metode Triage Prehospital pada Insiden Korban Masal (Mass Casualty Incident). doi: 10.1021/bi0520479. Lee, C. H. (2010) ‘Disaster and Mass Casualty Triage’, Virtual Mentor, 12(6), p. 466. Miniard, J. L. and Ballman, K. (2018) ‘Nurse Practitioner Triage of the Neurosurgical Patient : A Patient Centered Care Delivery Model’, Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 50, pp. 244–246. Najjar, R. H., Lyman, B. and Miehl, N. (2015) ‘Nursing students’ experiences with high-fidelity simulation’, International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), pp. 1–9. Nicely, S. and Farra, S. (2015) ‘Fostering learning through Interprofessional Virtual Reality Simulation Development’, Journal Nursing Education Perspectives, 36, pp. 335–336. Park, H. J. et al. (2018) ‘Video education versus face-to-face education on inhaler technique for patients with well-controlled or partly-controlled asthma: A phase IV, open-label, non-inferiority, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial’, PLoS ONE, 13(8), pp. 1–16. WHO (2018) Global Status Report On Road Safety 2018. Zapko, K. A. et al. (2011) ‘Interdisciplinary Disaster Drill Simulation : Laying the Groundwork for Further’, 36(6), pp. 299–302.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This journal is licensed under the a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
