Analogy interpretation for renewal criminal justice in Indonesia
Keywords:
Legal interpretation, analogy, criminal justiceAbstract
The order of criminal law in Indonesia until now uses thinking legal-positivism, where the law is considered limited to obeying what is in the text and its meaning which is still formal-textualist. The law must have an element of justice in deciding each case. Thought postivistic legal is considered contrary to the social conditions of society. The times have demanded the law to be adaptive, requiring renewal of criminal law and its implementation in the judiciary. The development of an increasingly sophisticated era raises many new problems in society. This study intends to criticize the prohibition of analogies that are considered to be contrary to the principle of legality. Through normative research methods, researchers try to decipher qualitatively by looking at the theoretical basis of the formulation of the problem made regarding the opinions of experts related to the use of legal analogies. Meanwhile, through a descriptive approach, researchers try to describe the social situation of the people at the time of the prohibition of analogies or the cause of the emergence of the principle of legality with this modern era. The results of this study indicate that a judge is allowed to use analytical interpretation in deciding new cases.Downloads
References
Batarbutar, E. N. (2012). Anatomi Dalam Penerapan Asas Legalitas Dalam Proses Penemuan Hukum. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 152.
Endrawati, L. (2018). Rekonstruksi Analogi Dalam Hukum Pidana Sebagai Metode Penafsiran Hukum Untuk Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Dengan Pendekatan Aliran Progresif. Hermeneutika: Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 83.
Gunarto, M. (2012). Asas Keseimbangan Dalam Konsep Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Mimbar Hukum, 24(1), 89.
Hamidi, J. (2011). Hermeneutika Hukum. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Hardinanto, A. (2016). Manfaat Analogi Dalam Hukum Pidana Untuk Mengatasi Kejahatan yang Mengalami Modernisasi. Yuridika, 31(2), 229.
Ilya, A. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Memahami Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan. Rangkang Education, 1(1), 1.
Imran, M. (2017). Qiyas dan Analogi Hukum (Suatu telaah dan perbandingan dalam penemuan hukum). Al-Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 2(1), 104.
KUHAP Kitab Undang-Undang Acara Hukum Pidana.
Lailiyah, S. (2014). Penalaran Analogi: Tinjauan Tipe dan Komponennya. Seminar Nasional TEQIP EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCES 2014. Semarang.
Moeljanto. (2000). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Nugroho, T. (2018). Pemikiran Pompe Mengenai Analogi dalam Hukum Pidana. Retrieved November 21, 2019, from
http://vivajusticia.law.ugm.ac.id/2018/11/29/pemikiran-pompe-mengenai-analogi-dalam-hukum-pidana/
Prahassacitta, V. (2016). The Concept of Extraordinary Crime in Indonesia Legal System: is The Concept An Effective Criminal Policy? Jurnal Humniora, 7(4), 513–521.
Prakoso, A. (2016). Penemuan Hukum: Sitem, Metode, Aliran dan Prosedur Dalam Menemukan Hukum. Jember.
Purwaka, T. H. (2011). Penafsiran, Penalaran, dan Argumentasi Hukum yang Rasional. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 40(2), 118.
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: PT Kompas Media Nusantara.
Reza, M. (2011). Kerjasama KPPU Dengan Penyidik Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Hukum Persaingan Usaha, (KPPU in Corporation with Natonal Police in Hadling Criminal Case of Competition Law). KPPU Competition Law Jurnal, 104.
Savitri, N. (2007). Tugas Hakim dan Penafsiran. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justicia, 25(4), 340.
Syaputra, M. Y. A. (2017). Penafsiran Hukum oleh Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Mercatorio, 1(2), 120.
Tongat, T. (2016). Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Pidana Naional: Telaah Kritis Larangan Analogi dalam Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(3), 229.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009. Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Yasanegara, I. (2016). Urgensi Asas Legalitas Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional di Indonesia. Krettha Dyatmka, 13(1), 6.
Yasin, I. F. (2016). Analisis Terhadap Larangan Analogi Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 2(2), 410.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ulfa Anaria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
